Plant and Soil

, Volume 205, Issue 1, pp 13–24 | Cite as

Water use by woody plants on contrasting soils in a savanna parkland: assessment with δ2H and δ18O

  • A.J. Midwood
  • T.W. Boutton
  • S.R. Archer
  • S.E. Watts


In savanna parklands of southern Texas, patches of grassland and ‘discrete clusters’ of small trees and shrubs occur on sandy loam surface soils underlain by an argillic horizon (claypan) at 40 cm. Large trees and shrubs in ‘groves’ occur on deep (2 m) sandy loam soils without an argillic horizon. δ2H and δ18O of rainfall, groundwater, and soil and plant water were measured to: (1) determine if coexistence in woody patches occurs via vertical stratification of soil water uptake; (2) document differences in plant water acquisition on contrasting soil types; and (3) evaluate recharge and evaporative losses of soil moisture from grassland vs. wooded landscape elements. Groundwater was isotopically similar to weighted rainfall, suggesting local recharge at this site. Linear regressions of soil water δ2H on δ18O yielded slopes less than the meteoric water line, indicating significant evaporative losses of soil moisture in all landscape elements. Interspecific differences in root density distribution were significant; some woody species had roots well below 1.6 m, while others had few roots below 0.8 m. δ2H and δ18O values of stem water from all plants in groves were lower than those of soil water in the upper 1.5 m of the profile, suggesting all species obtained their water from depths >1.5 m. Deep roots of trees and shrubs at this savanna parkland site thus appeared to have a functional significance that was not revealed by biomass or density determinations. Root densities of species in discrete clusters (claypan present) were typically greater than those of the same species in groves (claypan absent), especially in the upper 80 cm of the soil profile. Consistent with rooting profiles, δ2H and δ18O values of plant water indicated that trees and shrubs in discrete clusters with fine- textured subsoils obtained most of their water at depths <1.5 m. As with groves, there was no indication of water resource partitioning between species. In summary, we saw no isotopic evidence that co- occurring woody plants at this savanna parkland site were partitioning soil moisture vertically during late summer/early fall, despite marked differences in their root density distributions. This supports other lines of evidence which indicate that species interactions in tree/shrub clumps are competitive, and that species composition is therefore unstable in those landscape elements.

argillic horizon deuterium hydrology oxygen-18 plant water uptake root distribution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allison G B, Barnes C J and Hughes M W 1983 The distribution of deuterium and oxygen-18 in dry soils: II. Experimental. J. Hydrol. 64, 377-397.Google Scholar
  2. Archer S R 1995 Tree dynamics in a Prosopis-thorn scrub savanna parkland: Reconstructing the past and predicting the future. Ecoscience 2, 83-99.Google Scholar
  3. Archer S R, Scifres C, Bassham C R and Maggio R 1988 Autogenic succession in a subtropical savanna: conversion of grassland to thorn woodland. Ecol. Monogr. 58, 111-127.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes C J and Allison G B 1988 Tracing water movement in the unsaturated zone using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen. J. Hydrol. 100, 143-176.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes P W and Archer S R 1996 Competition and facilitation between overstory and understory woody plants in a subtropical savanna. In LaCopita Research Area Consolidated Progress Report. Eds. J W Stuth and S M Dudash. pp 11-15. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, CPR-5047, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  6. Boutton T W, Archer S R, Midwood A J, Zitzer S F and Bol R 1998 δ13C values of soil organic carbon and their use in documenting vegetation change in a subtropical savanna ecosystem. Geoderma 82, 5-41.Google Scholar
  7. Brown J R and Archer S 1990 Water relations of a perennial grass and seedling vs. adult plants in a subtropical savanna, Texas. Oikos 57, 366-374.Google Scholar
  8. Brunel J-P, Walker G R, Walker C D, Dighton J C and Kennett-Smith A 1991 Using stable isotopes to trace plant water uptake. In Stable isotopes in plant nutrition, soil fertility and environmental studies. pp 543-551. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
  9. Brunel J-P, Walker G R and Kennett-Smith A K 1995 Field validation of isotopic procedures for determining sources of water used by plants in a semi-arid environment. J. Hydrol. 167, 351-368.Google Scholar
  10. Caldwell M M and Richards J H 1986 Competing root systems: Morphology and models of absorption. In On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Ed. T Givnish. pp 251-273. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. CaIdwell M M and Richards J H 1989 Hydraulic lift: Water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79, 1-5.Google Scholar
  12. Correll D S and Johnston M C 1979 Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Craig H 1961 Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133, 1702-1703.Google Scholar
  14. Dansgaard W 1964 Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16, 436-468.Google Scholar
  15. Dawson T E 1993a Water sources of plants as determined from xylem-water isotopic composition: Perspectives on plant competition, distribution, and water relations. In Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Eds. J R Ehleringer, A E Hall and G D Farquhar. pp 465-496. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Dawson T E 1993b Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: Implications for water balance, performance, and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia 95, 565-574.Google Scholar
  17. Dawson T E and Elheringer J R 1991 Streamside trees that do not use stream water. Nature 350, 335-337.Google Scholar
  18. Dawson T E and Pate J 5 1996 Seasonal water uptake and movement in root systems of Australian phraeatophytic plants of dimorphic root morphology: A stable isotope investigation. Oecologia 107, 13-20.Google Scholar
  19. Eagleson P S and Segarra R I 1985 Water-limited equilibrium of savanna vegetation systems. Water Resour. Res. 21, 1483-1493.Google Scholar
  20. Ehieringer J R and Dawson T E 1992 Water uptake by plants: Perspectives from stable isotope composition. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 1073-1082.Google Scholar
  21. Forstel H 1982 18O/16O-ratio of water in plants and in their environment. In Stable Isotopes. Eds. H-L Schmidt, H Forstel and K Heizinger. pp 503-509. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. Forstel H 1996 Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in soil water: Use of 18O and D in soil water to study the soil-plant-water system. In Mass Spectrometry of Soils. Eds. T W Boutton and S-I Yamasaki. pp 285-309. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  23. Gat J 1971 Comments on the stable isotope method in regional groundwater investigations. Water Resour. Res. 7, 980-993.Google Scholar
  24. Gonfiantini R 1981 The δ-notation and mass-spectrometric measurement techniques. In Stable isotope hydrology: Deuterium and oxygen-18 in the water cycle. Eds. J R Gat and R Gonfiantini. pp 35-84. IAEA Technical Report Series 210, Vienna.Google Scholar
  25. Hartley P E 1981 Deuterium/hydrogen ratios in Australian rainfall. J. Hydrol. 50, 217-229.Google Scholar
  26. Ingraham N L and Shadel C 1992 A comparison of the toluene distillation and vacuum/heat methods for extracting soil water for stable isotope analysis. J. Hydrol. 140, 371-387.Google Scholar
  27. Knoop W T and Walker B H 1985 Interactions of woody and herbaceous vegetation in a Southern African savanna. J. Ecol. 73, 235-253.Google Scholar
  28. LeRoux X, Bariac T and Mariotti A 1995 Spatial partitioning of the soil water resource between grass and shrub components in a West African humid savanna. Oecologia 104, 147-155.Google Scholar
  29. Manning S J and Barbour M G 1988 Root systems, spatial patterns, and competition for soil moisture between two desert subshrubs. Am. J. Bot. 75, 983-995.Google Scholar
  30. Mathieu R and Bariac T 1996 An isotopic study (2H and 18O) of water movements in clayey soils under a semiarid climate. Water Resour. Res. 32, 779-789.Google Scholar
  31. Midwood A J, Haggarty P, Milne E and McGaw B A 1992 Factors affecting the analysis of 18O-enriched aqueous samples when using CO2 equilibration in Vacutainers. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 43, 1341-1347.Google Scholar
  32. Mooney H A, Gulmon S L, Rundel P W and Ehleringer J R 1980 Further observations on the water relations of Prosopis tamarugo of the northern Atacama Desert. Oecologia 44, 177-180.Google Scholar
  33. Pelaez D V, Distel R A, Boo R M, Elia 0 R and Mayor M D 1994 Water relations between shrubs and grasses in semi-arid Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 27, 71-78.Google Scholar
  34. Revesz K and Woods P H 1990 A method to extract soil water for stable isotope analysis. J. Hydrol. 115, 397-406.Google Scholar
  35. Sala O E, Golluscio R A, Lauenroth W K and Soriano A 1989 Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia 81, 501-505.Google Scholar
  36. Scholes R and Archer S 1997 Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 517-544.Google Scholar
  37. Schulze E D, Mooney H A, Sala O E, Jobbagy E, Buchmann N, Bauer G, Canadell J, Jackson RB, Loreti J, Oesterheld M and Ehleringer J R 1996 Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia. Oecologia 108, 503-511.Google Scholar
  38. Scifres C J and Koerth B H 1987 Climate, vegetation, and soils of the La Copita Research Area. Texas Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin MP-1626, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
  39. Walker B H and Noy-Meir I 1982 Aspects of stability and resilience of savanna ecosystems. In Ecology of Tropical Savannas. Eds. B J Huntley and B H Walker. pp 556-590. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Walker C D and Brunel J-P 1990 Examining evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen. J. Hydrol. 118, 55-75.Google Scholar
  41. Walker C D and Richardson S B 1991 The use of stable isotopes of water in characterizing the source of water in vegetation. Chem. Geol. (Isot. Geochem. Sect.) 94, 145-158.Google Scholar
  42. Walter H 1971 Ecology of tropical and subtropical vegetation. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  43. Watts S E 1993 Rooting patterns of co-occurring woody plants in a subtropical savanna. M.S. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Weltz M A and Blackburn W H 1995 Water budget for south Texas rangelands. J. Range Manage. 48, 45-52.Google Scholar
  45. Weltzin J F and McPherson G R 1997 Spatial and temporal soil moisture resource partitioning by trees and grasses in a temperate savanna, Arizona, USA. Oecologia 112, 156-164.Google Scholar
  46. Wershaw R L, Friedman I, Heller S J and Frank P A 1966 Hydrogen isotope fractionation of water passing through trees. In Advances in organic geochemistry. Eds. G D Hobson and G S Spears. pp 55-67. Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
  47. White J W C, Cook E R, Lawrence J R and Broecker W S 1985 The D/H ratios of sap in trees: Implications for water sources and tree ring D/H ratios. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 237-246.Google Scholar
  48. Wong W W, Lee L S and Kiein P D 1987 Deuterium and oxygen-18 measurements on microliter samples of urine, plasma, saliva and human milk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45, 905-913.Google Scholar
  49. Yeaton R I, Travis J and Gilinsky E 1977 Competition and spacing in plant communities: The Arizona upland association. J. Ecol. 65, 587-595.Google Scholar
  50. Zimmerman U, Ehhalt D and Munnich K O 1967 Soil water movement and evapotranspiration: Changes in the isotopic composition of the water. In Isotopes in Hydrology. pp 567-585. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.J. Midwood
    • 1
  • T.W. Boutton
    • 1
  • S.R. Archer
    • 1
  • S.E. Watts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rangeland Ecology and ManagementTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations