Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 501–547

Severe Withdrawal (and Recovery)

  • Hans Rott
  • Maurice Pagnucco

DOI: 10.1023/A:1004344003217

Cite this article as:
Rott, H. & Pagnucco, M. Journal of Philosophical Logic (1999) 28: 501. doi:10.1023/A:1004344003217


The problem of how to remove information from an agent's stock of beliefs is of paramount concern in the belief change literature. An inquiring agent may remove beliefs for a variety of reasons: a belief may be called into doubt or the agent may simply wish to entertain other possibilities. In the prominent AGM framework for belief change, upon which the work here is based, one of the three central operations, contraction, addresses this concern (the other two deal with the incorporation of new information). Makinson has generalised this work by introducing the notion of a withdrawal operation. Underlying the account proffered by AGM is the idea of rational belief change. A belief change operation should be guided by certain principles or integrity constraints in order to characterise change by a rational agent. One of the most noted principles within the context of AGM is the Principle of Informational Economy. However, adoption of this principle in its purest form has been rejected by AGM leading to a more relaxed interpretation. In this paper, we argue that this weakening of the Principle of Informational Economy suggests that it is only one of a number of principles which should be taken into account. Furthermore, this weakening points toward a Principle of Indifference. This motivates the introduction of a belief removal operation that we call severe withdrawal. We provide rationality postulates for severe withdrawal and explore its relationship with AGM contraction. Moreover, we furnish possible worlds and epistemic entrenchment semantics for severe withdrawals.

AGM belief change belief contraction epistemic entrenchment severe withdrawal systems of spheres 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Rott
    • 1
  • Maurice Pagnucco
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Computational Reasoning Group, Department of Computing, Division of Information and Communication SciencesMacquarie UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations