Plant and Soil

, Volume 210, Issue 2, pp 145–157 | Cite as

Water-extractable humic substances enhance iron deficiency responses by Fe-deficient cucumber plants

  • R. Pinton
  • S. Cesco
  • S. Santi
  • F. Agnolon
  • Z. Varanini
Article

Abstract

The ability of Fe-deficient cucumber plants to use iron complexed to a water-extractable humic substances fraction (WEHS), was investigated. Seven-day-old Fe-deficient plants were transferred to a nutrient solution supplemented daily for 5 days with 0.2 μM Fe as Fe-WEHS (5 μg org. C mL-1), Fe-EDTA, Fe-citrate or FeCl3. These treatments all allowed re-greening of the leaf tissue, and partial recovery of dry matter accumulation, chlorophyll and iron contents. However, the recovery was faster in plants supplied with Fe-WEHS and was already evident 48 h after Fe supply. The addition of 0.2 μM Fe to the nutrient solution caused also a partial recovery of the dry matter and iron accumulation in roots of Fe-deficient cucumber plants, particularly in those supplied with Fe-WEHS. The addition of WEHS alone (5 μg org. C mL-1, 0.04 μM Fe) to the nutrient solution slightly but significantly increased iron and chlorophyll contents in leaves of Fe-deficient plants; in these plants, dry matter accumulation in leaves and roots was comparable or even higher than that measured in plants treated with Fe-citrate or FeCl3. After addition of the different iron sources for 5 days to Fe-deficient roots, morphological modifications (proliferation of lateral roots, increase in the diameter of the sub-apical zones and amplified root-hair formation) and physiological responses (enhanced Fe(III)-chelate reductase and acidification of the nutrient solution) induced by Fe deficiency, were still evident, particularly in plants treated with the humic molecules. The presence of WEHS caused also a further acidification of the nutrient medium by Fe-deficient plants. The Fe-WEHS complex (1 μM Fe) could be reduced by intact cucumber roots, at rates of reduction higher than those measured for Fe-EDTA at equimolar iron concentration. Plasma membrane vesicles, purified by two-phase partition from root microsomes of Fe-deficient plants, were also able to reduce Fe-WEHS. Results show that Fe-deficient cucumber plants can use iron complexed to water soluble humic substances, at least in part via reduction of complexed Fe(III) by the plasma membrane Fe(III)-chelate reductase of root cells. In addition, the stimulating effect of humic substances on H+ release might be of relevance for the overall response of the plants to iron shortage.

Cucumis sativus Fe(III)-chelate reductase humic substances iron deficiency iron nutrition root acidification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken G R, Thurman E M and Malcolm R L 1979 Comparison of XAD macroporous resins for the concentration of fulvic acid from aqueous solution. Anal. Chem. 51, 1799–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradford M M 1976 A rapid and sensitive method of quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckhout T J, Bell P F, Luster D G and Chaney R L 1989 Ironstress induced redox activity in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) is localized on the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol. 90, 151–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaney R L, Brown J C and Tiffin L O 1972 Obligatory reduction of ferric chelates in iron uptake by soybeans. Plant Physiol. 50, 208–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y and Aviad T (1990) Effects of humic substances on plant growth. In Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: selected readings. Eds. P MacCarthy, C E Clapp, R L Malcolm and P R Bloom. pp 161–186. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  6. Crosser M L and Allen H E 1977 Determination of complexation capacity of soluble ligands by ion exchange equilibrium. Soil Sci. 123, 176–181.Google Scholar
  7. Crowley D E and Gries D 1994 Modeling of iron availability in the plant rhizosphere. In Biochemistry of metal micronutrients in the rhizosphere. Eds. J A Manthey, D E Crowley and D G Luster. pp 199–223. Lewis, New York.Google Scholar
  8. David P P, Nelson P V and Sanders D C 1994 A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. J. Plant Nutr. 17, 173–184.Google Scholar
  9. Forbusch B 1983 Assay of Na+K+-ATPase in plasma membrane preparations: increasing the permeability of membrane vesicles using sodium dodecyl sulfate buffered with bovine serum albumin. Anal. Biochem. 128, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerke J 1993 Solubilization of Fe(III) from humic-Fe complexes, humic/Fe-oxide mixtures and from poorly ordered Fe-oxide by organic acids-consequences for P adsorption. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 156, 253–257.Google Scholar
  11. Hodges T K and Leonard R T 1974 Purification of a plasma membrane-bound adenosine triphosphatase from plant roots. Methods Enzymol. 32, 392–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones D L, Darrah P R and Kochian L V 1996 Critical evaluation of organic acid mediated iron dissolution in the rhizosphere and its potential role in root iron uptake. Plant Soil 180, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kodama H, Schnitzer M and Murad E 1988 An investigation of iron(III)-fulvic acids complexes by Mössbauer spectroscopy and chemical methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 994–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kochian L V 1991 Mechanisms of micronutrient uptake and translocation in plants. In Micronutrients in Agriculture. Eds. J J Mortvedt, F R Cox, L M Shuman and R M Welch. pp 229–296. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  15. Kuiters A T and Mulder W 1993 Water-soluble organic matter in forest soil. Plant Soil 152, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindsay W L 1991 Inorganic equilibria affecting micronutrients in soils. In Micronutrients in Agriculture. Eds. J J Mortvedt, F R Cox, L M Shuman and R M Welch. pp 89–112. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  17. Lichtenthaler H K 1987 Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 148, 350–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundborg T, Widell S and Larsson C 1981 Distribution of ATPase in wheat root membranes separated by phase partition. Plant Physiol. 52, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marschner H and Römheld V 1994 Strategies of plants for acquisition of iron. Plant Soil 165, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moog P R and Brüggemann W 1994 Iron reductase systems on the plant plasma membrane - A review. Plant Soil 165, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piccolo A, Pietramellara G and Cellano G 1993 Iron extractability from iron-humate complexes by a siderophore and a mixture of organic acids. Can. J. Soil Sci. 73, 293–298.Google Scholar
  22. Pinton R, Cesco S, De Nobili M, Santi S and Varanini Z 1998 Waterand pyrophosphate-extractable humic substances fractions as a source of iron for Fe-deficient cucumber plants. Biol. Fert. Soil 26, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinton R, Cesco S, Santi S and Varanini Z 1997 Soil humic substances stimulate proton release by intact oat seedling roots. J. Plant Nutr. 20, 857–869.Google Scholar
  24. Römheld V and Marschner H 1986a Mobilization of iron in the rhizosphere of different plant species. In Advances in Plant Nutrition Vol. 2. Eds. B Tinker and A Läuchli. pp 155–204. Praeger Scientific, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Römheld V and Marschner H 1986b Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses. Plant Physiol. 80, 175–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwertmann U 1966 Inhibitory effect of soil organic matter on the crystallization of amorphous ferric hydroxide. Nature 212, 645–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shenker M, Oliver I, Helmann M, Hadar Y and Chen Y 1992 Utilization by tomatoes of iron mediated by a siderophore of graminaceous plants. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 2173–2182.Google Scholar
  28. Skogerboe R K and Wilson S A 1981 Reduction of ionic species by fulvic acid. Anal. Chem. 53, 228–232.Google Scholar
  29. Stevenson F J 1991 Organic matter-micronutrient reactions in soil. In Micronutrients in Agriculture. Eds. J J Mortvedt, F R Cox, L M Shuman and R M Welch. pp 145–186. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  30. Stevenson F J 1994 Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions. J Wiley & Sons, USA. 496 p.Google Scholar
  31. Varanini Z and Pinton R 1995 Humic substances and plant nutrition. In Progress in Botany, Vol. 56. Ed. U Lüttge. pp 97–117. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  32. Varanini Z, Pinton R, De Biasi M G, Astolfi S and Maggioni A 1993 Low molecular weight humic substances stimulate HC-ATPase activity of plasma membrane vesicles isolated from oat (Avena sativa L.) roots. Plant Soil 153, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vaughan D and Malcolm R E 1985 Influence of humic substances on growth and physiological processes. In Soil organic matter and biological activity. Eds. D Vaughan and R E Malcolm. pp 37–75. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W Junk, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  34. Wang Y, Brown H N, Crowley D E and Szanislo P J 1993 Evidence for direct utilization of a siderophore, ferrioxamine B, in axenically grown cucumber. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yehuda Z, Shenker M, Römheld V, Marschner H, Hadar Y and Chen Y 1996 The role of ligand exchange in the uptake of iron from microbial siderophores by gramineous plants. Plant Physiol. 112, 1273–1280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zimmerman A P 1981 Electron intensity, the role of humic acids in extracellular electron transport and chemical determination of pE in natural water. Hydrobiol. 78, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Pinton
    • 1
  • S. Cesco
    • 1
  • S. Santi
    • 1
  • F. Agnolon
    • 1
  • Z. Varanini
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Produzione Vegetale e Tecnologie AgrarieUniversity of UdineUdineItaly E-mail

Personalised recommendations