Plant and Soil

, Volume 206, Issue 1, pp 1–10

Citrus root responses to localized drying soil: A new approach to studying mycorrhizal effects on the roots of mature trees

  • Javier F. Espeleta
  • David M. Eissenstat
  • James H. Graham
Article

Abstract

Because fine roots tend to be concentrated at the soil surface, exposure to dry surface soil can have a large influence on patterns of root growth, death and respiration. We studied the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM) formation on specific root length (SRL), respiration and mortality of fine roots of bearing red grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) trees on Volkamer lemon (C. volkameriana Tan. & Pasq.) rootstock exposed to drying soil. For each tree, the fine roots were removed from two woody lateral roots, the roots were surface sterilized and then each woody root was placed in a separate pair of vertically divided and independently irrigated soil compartments. The two split-pot systems were filled with sterilized soil and one was inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus etunicatum/G. intraradices). New fine lateral roots that emerged from the woody laterals were permitted to grow inside the pots over a 10-month period. Irrigation was then removed from the top compartment for a 15-week period. At the end of the study, roots inoculated with AM fungi exhibited about 20% incidence of AM formation, whereas the uninoculated roots were completely void of AM fungi. Arbuscular mycorrhizal roots exhibited lower SRL, lower root/soil respiration and about 10% lower fine root mortality than nonmycorrhizal roots after 15 weeks of exposure to dry surface soil. This study demonstrates the feasibility of examining mycorrhizal effects on the fine roots of adult trees in the field using simple inexpensive methods.

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi citrus Citrus volkameriana dry soil fine roots Glomus etunicatum Glomus intraradices root death root respiration Rutaceae specific root length vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Volkamer lemon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augé R M and Stodola A J W 1990 An apparent increase in symplastic water contributes to greater turgor in mycorrhizal roots of droughted Rosa plants. New Phytol. 115, 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benhamou N, Fortin J A, Hamel C, St-Arnaud M and A. Shatilla A 1994 Resistance responses of mycorrhizal Ri T-DNA-transformed carrot roots to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Chrysanthemi. Phytopathology 84, 958–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berta G, Fusconi A and Trotta A 1993 VA mycorrhizal infection and the morphology and function of root systems. Env. Exper. Bot. 33, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berta G, Trotta A, Fusconi A, Hooker J E, Munro M, Atkinson D, Giovannetti M, Morini S, Fortuna P, Tisserant B, Gianinazzi-Pearson V and Gianinazzi S 1995 Arbuscular mycorrhizal induced changes to plant growth and root system morphology in Prunus cerasifera. Tree Physiol. 5, 281–293.Google Scholar
  5. Bryla D R and Duniway J M 1997a Growth, phosphorus uptake, and water relations of safflower and wheat infected with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New. Phytol. 136, 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryla D R and Duniway J M 1997b Water uptake by safflower and wheat roots infected with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New. Phytol. 136, 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryla D R and Duniway J M 1997c Effects of mycorrhizal infection on drought tolerance and recovery in safflower and wheat. Plant Soil 197, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chabot B F and Hicks D J 1982 The ecology of leaf life spans. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 13, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin F S III, Bloom A J, Field C B and Waring R H 1987 Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. BioScience 37, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deans J D 1979 Fluctuations of the soil environment and fine root growth in a young Sitka spruce plantation. Plant Soil 52, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eissenstat D M 1992 Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 763–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eissenstat D M 1997 Trade-offs in root form and function. In Ecology in Agriculture. Ed. L. E. Jackson. pp 173–179. Academic Press, San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eissenstat D M and Duncan L W 1992 Root growth and carbohydrate responses in bearing citrus trees following partial canopy removal. Tree Physiol. 10, 245–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eissenstat D M, Graham J H, Syvertsen J P and Drouillard D L 1993 Carbon economy of sour orange in relation to mycorrhizal colonization and phosphorus status. Ann. Bot. 71, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eissenstat D M and Yanai R D 1997 The ecology of root lifespan. Adv. Ecol. Res. 27, 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Espeleta J F and Eissenstat D M 1998 Responses of citrus fine roots to localized soil drying: a comparison of seedlings with adult fruiting trees. Tree Physiol. 18, 113–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gange A C, Brown V K and Sinclair G S 1994 Reduction of black vine weevil larval growth by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 70, 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham J H 1988 Interactions of mycorrhizal fungi with soil borne plant pathogens and other organisms: an introduction. Phytopathology. 78, 365–366.Google Scholar
  19. Graham J H, Syvertsen J P and Smith M L 1987 Water relations of mycorrhizal and phosphorus-fertilized non-mycorrhizal citrus under drought stress. New Phytol. 105, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graham J H, Eissenstat D M and Drouillard D L 1991 On the relationship between a plant's mycorrhizal dependency and rate of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Funct. Ecol. 5, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooker J E, Munro M and Atkinson D 1992 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induced alteration in poplar root system morphology. Plant Soil 145, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooker J E, Black K E, Perry, R L and Atkinson D 1995 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induced alteration to root longevity of poplar. Plant Soil 172, 327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang B and P S Nobel P S 1992 Hydraulic conductivity and anatomy for lateral roots of Agave deserti during root growth and drought induced abscission. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 1441–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klironomos J N and Kendrick W B 1993 Research on mycorrhizas: trends in the past 40 years as expressed in the ‘MYCOLIT’ database. New Phytol. 125, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kosola K and Eissenstat D M 1994 The fate of surface roots of citrus seedlings in dry soil. J. Exp. Bot. 45, 1639–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosola K, Eissenstat D M and Graham J H 1995 Root demography of mature citrus trees: the influence of Phytophthora nicotianae. Plant Soil 171, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelsen C E and Safir G R 1982 Increased drought tolerance of mycorrhizal onion plants caused by improved phosphorus nutrition. Planta 154, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman E I 1966 A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newsham K K, Fitter A H and Watkinson A R 1995 Arbuscular mycorrhiza protect an annual grass from root pathogenic fungi in the field. J. Ecol. 83, 991–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nobel P S, AlM D M and Cavalier J 1992 Growth respiration, maintenance respiration and structural carbon-costs for roots of three desert succulents. Funct. Ecol. 6, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norman J M, Garcia S and Verma S B 1992 Soil surface CO2 fluxes and the carbon budget of a grassland. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 18845–18853.Google Scholar
  32. Palta J A and Nobel P S 1989 Influences of water status, temperature, and root age on daily patterns of root respiration for two cactus species. Ann. Bot. 63, 651–662.Google Scholar
  33. Pan W L and Bolton R P 1991 Root quantification by edge discrimination using a desktop scanner. Agron. J. 83, 1047–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peng S P, Eissenstat D M, Graham J H, Williams K and Hodge N 1993 Growth depression in mycorrhizal citrus at high phosphorus supply: analysis of carbon costs. Plant Physiol. 101, 1063–1071.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Persson H 1979 Fine-root production, mortality and decomposition in forest ecosystems. Vegetatio 41, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rygiewicz P T and Andersen C P 1994 Mycorrhizae alter quality and quantity of carbon allocated below ground. Nature 369, 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stroble N E and Sinclair W A 1992 The role of mycorrhizal fungi in tree defense against fungal pathogens of roots. In Defense mechanisms of woody plants against fungi. Eds. R. A. Blanchette and A. R. Biggs. pp 321–353. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Sukarno N, Smith S E and Scott E S. 1993 Effect of fungicides on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. I. The effects on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth. New Phytol. 125, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sukarno N, Smith F A, Smith S E and Scott E S. 1996. The effect of fungicides on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. II. The effects on area of interface and efficiency of P uptake and transfer to plant. New Phytol. 132, 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersect method for estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veen B W 1981 Relation between root respiration and root activity. Plant Soil 63, 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams K, Field C B and Mooney H A 1989 Relationship among leaf construction cost, leaf longevity and light environment in rain-forest plants of the genus Piper. Am. Naturalist 133, 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier F. Espeleta
    • 1
  • David M. Eissenstat
    • 2
  • James H. Graham
    • 1
  1. 1.Citrus Research and Education CenterUniversity of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural SciencesLake AlfredUSA
  2. 2.Department of HorticultureThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of BotanyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations