Plant and Soil

, Volume 205, Issue 2, pp 193–201 | Cite as

Fine root length production, mortality and standing root crop dynamics in an intensively managed sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) coppice

  • Jeffrey S. Price
  • Ronald L. Hendrick


We used minirhizotrons and micro-video technology to study fine root production, mortality and standing root crop dynamics in an intensively managed sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) coppice. The experiment was a split-plot design with two levels of fertilization. Low-level treatment plots received 560 kg ha-1 yr-1 fertilizer (19:9:19 NPK) via a drip irrigation system and high-level treatment plots received twice this amount. Approximately 150 cm yr-1 irrigation was applied to all treatments. There were no significant treatment differences in daily average fine root production or mortality. The phenology of fine root production and mortality, however, was characterized by strongly seasonal asynchrony. Production increased throughout the summer, peaked in September and declined sharply over the winter. Root mortality was not observed in either treatment until August, and then increased significantly throughout the winter months. There were also no significant treatment differences in standing fine root length. Standing live root length was greatest in the fall and dead root length was greatest over the winter. Roots in the upper 25 cm of the soil profile appeared to be significantly more dynamic (i.e. greater production and mortality) than deeper roots in both treatments. High levels of fertilization apparently do not alter fine root dynamics at our sites, in contrast to fertilization responses observed in other, more nutrient-poor environments.

coppice demography fertilization fine roots minirhizotron sweetgum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aber, J D, Melillo J M, Nadelhoffer K J, McClaugherty C A and Pastor J 1985 Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability. Oecologia 66, 317-321.Google Scholar
  2. Axelsson E and Axelsson B 1986 Changes in carbon allocation patterns in spruce and pine trees following irrigation and fertilization. Tree Physiol. 2, 189-204.Google Scholar
  3. Blackmon B G 1977 Effects of fertilizer nitrogen on tree growth, foliar nitrogen, and herbage in eastern Cottonwood plantations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 992-995.Google Scholar
  4. Burke M K, Raynal D J and Mitchell M J 1992 Soil nitrogen availability influences seasonal carbon allocation patterns in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.). Can. J. For. Res. 22, 447-456.Google Scholar
  5. Clark P A 1996 Building the American dream: forest management is the key to maintaining wilderness areas, providing wood products. UT Agriculture, Winter. Knoxville, TN.Google Scholar
  6. Eissenstat D M 1991 On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstock. New Phytol. 118, 63-68.Google Scholar
  7. Faust T D, McAlister R H, Zarnoch S J and Stephens C B 1991 Potential utilization of sweetgum and yellow-poplar for structural lumber. In Proceedings from the 19th Annual Hardwood Symposium of the Hardwood Research Council. pp 75-98. Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
  8. Gladders G W 1997 Above-ground biomass partitioning, nutrient content, and leaf litterfall dynamics of three-year-old, intensively managed sweetgum coppice. M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia. Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  9. Gower S T, Vogt K A and Grier C C 1992 Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: Influences of water and nutrient availability. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 43-65.Google Scholar
  10. Haynes B E and Gower S T 1995 Below-ground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized Red Pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiol. 15, 317-325.Google Scholar
  11. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1992 The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73, 1094-1104.Google Scholar
  12. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1993 The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2507-2520.Google Scholar
  13. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1996 Temporal and depth related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. J. Ecol. 84, 167-176.Google Scholar
  14. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1997 The relationship between fine root demography and the soil environment in northern hardwood forests. Ecoscience 4, 99-105.Google Scholar
  15. Hendricks J J, Nadelhoffer K J and Aber J D 1993 Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 174-178.Google Scholar
  16. Keyes M R and Grier C C 1981 Above-and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 599-605.Google Scholar
  17. Kormanik P 1990 Silvics of North America — volume 2: hardwoods. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook 654, 400-405. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Ku T T, Francis J K and Blinn C R 1981 Fertilizer response and biomass accumulation of a 5-year-old sweetgum plantation. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report 34, 195-198. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. Kuers K, Steinbeck K and Morris L A 1993 Root-shoot relationships of coppiced Sycamore and sweetgum. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SO 93, 279-285. Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhns M R, Garrett H E, Teskey R O and Hinckley T M 1985 Root growth of black walnut trees related to soil temperature, soil water potential, and leaf water potential. For. Sci. 31, 617-629.Google Scholar
  21. Ludovici K H and Morris L A 1996 Responses of loblolly pine, sweetgum, and crab grass roots to localized increases in nitrogen in two watering regimes. Tree Physiol. 16, 933-939.Google Scholar
  22. Mou P, Mitchell R J and Jones R H 1997 Root distribution of two species under heterogeneous nutrient environment. J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 645-656.Google Scholar
  23. Mou P, Jones R H, Mitchell R J and Zutter B 1995 Spatial distribution of roots in Sweetgum and Loblolly Pine monocultures and relations with above-ground biomass and soil nutrients. Funct. Ecol. 9, 689-699.Google Scholar
  24. Nadelhoffer K J, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1985 Fine roots, net primary production and nitrogen availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology 66, 1377-1390.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson L E, Shelton M G and Switzer G L 1995 Above-ground net primary productivity and nutrient content of fertilized plantation sweetgum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59, 925-932.Google Scholar
  26. Persson H 1980 Fine root dynamics in a Scots pine stand with and without near optimum nutrients and water regimes. Acta. Phytogeogr. Suec. 68, 101-110.Google Scholar
  27. Price J S 1998 The effects of fertilization on belowground allocation and fine root demography in an intensively managed sweetgum coppice. M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia. Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  28. Raich J W and Nadelhoffer K J 1989 Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 70, 1346-1354.Google Scholar
  29. Silberbush M and Barber S A 1983 Sensitivity analysis of parameters used in simulating K uptake with a mechanistic mathematical model. Agronomy J. 75, 851-854.Google Scholar
  30. Teskey R O and Hinckley T M 1981 Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth in white oak. Physiol. Plant. 52, 363-369.Google Scholar
  31. Weber E P and Day F P 1996 The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the phenology of roots in a barrier island sand dune community. Plant Soil 182, 139-148.Google Scholar
  32. Wittwer R F, King R H, Clayton J M and Hintin O W 1978 Biomass Yield of short rotation American Sycamore as influenced by site, fertilizers, spacing and rotation age. So. J. Appl. For. 2, 15-19.Google Scholar
  33. Worrell R and Hampson A 1997 The influence of some forest operations on the sustainable management of forest soils — a review. Forestry 70, 61-85.Google Scholar
  34. Wymann C E, Spindler D D and Grohmann K 1992 Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of several lignocellulosic feedstocks to fuel ethanol. Biomass and Bioenergy 3, 301-307.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey S. Price
    • 1
  • Ronald L. Hendrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Warnell School of Forest ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations