Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 200, Issue 1, pp 71–89 | Cite as

Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level

  • Kristiina A. Vogt
  • Daniel J. Vogt
  • Janine Bloomfield
Article

Abstract

The relationship of global climate change to plant growth and the role of forests as sites of carbon sequestration have encouraged the refinement of the estimates of root biomass and production. However, tremendous controversy exists in the literature as to which is the best method to determine fine root biomass and production. This lack of consensus makes it difficult for researchers to determine which methods are most appropriate for their system. The sequential root coring method was the most commonly used method to collect root biomass data in the past and is still commonly used. But within the last decade the use of minirhizotrons has become a favorite method of many researchers. In addition, due to the high labor-intensive requirements of many of the direct approaches to determine root biomass, there has been a shift to develop indirect methods that would allow fine root biomass and production to be predicted using data on easily monitored variables that are highly correlated to root dynamics. Discussions occur as to which method should be used but without gathering data from the same site using different methods, these discussions can be futile. This paper discusses and compares the results of the most commonly used direct and indirect methods of determining root biomass and production: sequential root coring, ingrowth cores, minirhizotrons, carbon fluxes approach, nitrogen budget approach and correlations with abiotic resources. No consistent relationships were apparent when comparing several sites where at least one of the indirect and direct methods were used on the same site. Until the different root methods can be compared to some independently derived root biomass value obtained from total carbon budgets for systems, one root method cannot be stated to be the best and the method of choice will be determined from researcher's personal preference, experiences, equipment, and/or finances.

calculations carbon flux method fine-root biomass methods forests indirect methods ingrowth cores minirhizotrons net primary production nitrogen budget method nutrients sequential soil coring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber J D, Mellilo J M, Nadelhoffer K J, McClaugherty C A and Pastor J 1985 Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: a comparison of two methods. Oecol. (Berl.) 66, 317-321.Google Scholar
  2. Aber J D and Federer C A 1992 A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecol. 92, 463-474.Google Scholar
  3. Adams C M and Hutchinson T C 1992 Fine-root growth and chemical composition in declining central Ontario sugar maple stands. Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1489-1503.Google Scholar
  4. Ågren G I, Axelsson B, Flower-Ellis J G K, Linder S, Persson H, Staaf H and Troeng E 1980 Annual carbon budget for a young Scots pine. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study. Ed. T Persson. pp 307-313. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32.Google Scholar
  5. Ballard R 1979 Use of fertilizers to maintain productivity of intensively managed forest plantations. In Proceedings Impact of Intensive Harvesting on Forest Nutrient Cycling. pp. 321-342. Northeast For. Exp. Sta. USDA For. Serv. Pennsylvania. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  6. Barber S A 1984 Soil Nutrient Bioavailability. A Mechanistic Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 398 p.Google Scholar
  7. Benzing D H 1991 Aerial roots and their environment. In The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 867-886. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Binkley D and Hart S C 1989 The components of nitrogen availability assessments in forest soils. In Advances in Soil Science, Vol. 10. pp 57-112. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bloomfield J, Vogt K A and Vogt D J 1993 Decay rate and substrate quality of fine roots and foliage of two tropical tree species in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Plant Soil 150, 233-245.Google Scholar
  10. Böhm W 1979 Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecological Studies 33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Bormann F H and Graham B F Jr 1958 Translocation of silvicides through root grafts. Forestry 58, 402-403.Google Scholar
  12. Boul S W, Hole F D and McCracken R J 1980 Soil Genesis and Classification. 2nd ed. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. 404 p.Google Scholar
  13. Bray J R and Gorham E 1964 Litter production in forests of the world. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2, 101-157.Google Scholar
  14. Brown D A and Upchurch D R 1987 Minirhizotrons: A summary of methods and instruments in current use. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 15-30. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  15. Burke M K and Raynal D J 1995 Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil 162, 135-146.Google Scholar
  16. Caldwell M M 1979 Root structure: the considerable cost of belowground functions. In Topics in Plant Population Biology. Eds. O T Solbrig, S Jain, G B Johnson and P H Raven. pp 408-427. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Clemensson-Lindell A 1994 Triphenyltetrazolium chloride as an indicator of fine-root vitality and environmental stress in coniferous forest stands: applications and limitations. Plant Soil 159, 297-300.Google Scholar
  18. Clemensson-Lindell A and Persson H 1995 Fine-root vitality in a Norway spruce stand subjected to various nutrient supplies. Plant Soil 168-169, 167–172.Google Scholar
  19. Cuevas E and Medina E 1983 Root production and organic matter decomposition in a Tierra Firme forest of the Upper Rio Negro Basin. In Wurzelokologie und Ihre Nutzanwendung. Eds. W Böhm, L Kutschera and E Lichtenegger. pp 653-666. BVA Gumpenstein, Irdning, Austria 775 p.Google Scholar
  20. Dixon R K, Meldahl R S, Ruark G A and Warren W G (Eds.) 1990 Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. 441 p.Google Scholar
  21. Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton R A, Solomon A M, Trexler M C and Wisniewski J 1994 Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263, 185-190.Google Scholar
  22. Eissenstat D M and Caldwell M M 1988 Seasonal timing of root growth in favorable microsites. Ecology 69, 870-873.Google Scholar
  23. Eissenstat D M and Van Rees K C J 1994 The growth and function of pine roots. In Environmental Constraints on the Structure and Productivity of Pine Forest Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Eds. H L Gholz, S Linder and R E McMurtrie. pp. 76-91. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen) 43.Google Scholar
  24. Ericsson A and Persson H 1980 Seasonal changes in starch reserves and growth of fine roots of 20-year-old scots pine. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study. pp 239-250. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32.Google Scholar
  25. Ewel K C, Cropper W P Jr and Gholz H L 1987 Soil CO2 evolution in Florida slash pine plantations. II. Importance of root respiration. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 330-333.Google Scholar
  26. Fabiao A, Persson H A and Steen E 1985 Growth dynamics of superficial roots in Portuguese plantations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. studied with a mesh bag technique. Plant Soil 83, 233-242.Google Scholar
  27. Ferguson J C and Smucker A J M 1989 Modifications of the minirhizotron video camera system for measuring spatial and temporal root dynamics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1601-1605.Google Scholar
  28. Flower-Ellis J G K and Persson H 1980 Investigations of structural properties and dynamics of Scots pine stands. In Structure and Function of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study. Ed. T Persson. pp 125-138. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32.Google Scholar
  29. Fogel R and Hunt G 1983 Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir ecosystem. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 219-232.Google Scholar
  30. Freckman D W and Virginia R A 1989 Plant-feeding nematodes in deep-rooting desert ecosystems. Ecology 70, 1665-1678.Google Scholar
  31. Friend A L, Eide M R and Hinckley T M 1990 Nitrogen stress alters root proliferation in Douglas-fir seedling. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 1524-1529.Google Scholar
  32. Gholz H L, Hendry L C and Cropper W P Jr 1986 Organic matter dynamics of fine roots in plantations of slash pine (Pinus elliotti) in north Florida. Can. J. For. Res., 16, 529-538.Google Scholar
  33. Gower S T, Vogt K A and Grier C C 1992 Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 43-65.Google Scholar
  34. Gower S T, Gholz H L, Nakane K and Baldwin V C 1994 Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. In Environmental Constraints on the Structure and Productivity of Pine Forest Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Eds. H L Gholz, S Linder and R E McMurtrie. pp 115-135. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen) 43.Google Scholar
  35. Gower S T, Running S W, Gholz H L, Haynes B E, Hunt J E R, Ryan M G, Waring R H and Cropper J W P 1996 Influence of climate and nutrition on carbon allocation and net primary production of four conifer forests. Tree Physiol. (In press).Google Scholar
  36. Graham B F Jr and Bormann F H 1966 Natural root grafts. Bot. Rev. 32, 255-292.Google Scholar
  37. Grier C C, Vogt K A, Keyes M R, and Edmonds R L 1981 Biomass distribution and above-and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can J. For. Res. 11, 155-167.Google Scholar
  38. Haynes B E and Gower S T 1995 Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilizied red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiol. 15, 317-325.Google Scholar
  39. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1992 Spatial variation in root distribution and growth associated with minirhizotrons. Plant Soil 143, 283-288.Google Scholar
  40. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1993 The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2507-2520.Google Scholar
  41. Henderson R, Ford E D, Renshaw E and Deans J D 1988 Morphology of the structural root system of Sitka spruce. 1. Analysis and quantitative description. Forestry 56, 121-135.Google Scholar
  42. Ingestad T and Ågren G 1992 Theories and methods on plant nutrition and growth. Physiol. Plant. 84, 177-184.Google Scholar
  43. Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, Mooney H A, Sala O E and Schulze E D 1996 A global analysis of root distribution for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108, 389-411.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson R B, Mooney H A and Schulze E-D 1997 A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7362-7366.Google Scholar
  45. Joslin J D and Henderson G S 1984 The determination of percentages of living tissue in woody fine root samples using triphenyltetrazolium chloride. Forest Sci. 30, 965-970.Google Scholar
  46. Keyes M R 1982 Ecosystem Development in Abies amabilis Stands of the Washington Cascades: Root Growth and its Role in Net Primary Production. Dissertation. University of Washington. Seattle, Washington, USA. 110 p.Google Scholar
  47. Keyes M R and Grier C C 1981 Below-and above-ground biomass and net production in two contrasting Douglas-fir stands. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 599-605.Google Scholar
  48. Kurz W A and Kimmins J P 1987 Analysis of some sources of error in methods used to determine fine root production in forest ecosystems: a simulation approach. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 909-912.Google Scholar
  49. Lambers H and Poorter H 1992 Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23, 187-261.Google Scholar
  50. Landsberg J J, Linder S and McMurtrie R E 1995 A strategic plan for research on managed forest ecosystems in a globally changing environment. Global change and Terrestrial Ecosystems GCTE Report No. 4. GCTE Activity 3.5: Effects of Global Change on Managed Forests. Implementation Plan. pp 1-17.Google Scholar
  51. Lussenhop J, Fogel R and Pregitzer K 1991 A new dawn for soil biology: video analysis of root-soil-microbial faunal interactions. Agric. Ecosys. and Environ. 34, 235-249.Google Scholar
  52. Lyr H and Hoffmann G 1967 Growth rates and growth periodicity of tree roots. In International Review of Forestry Research, Vol. 2. Eds. J A Romberger and P Mikola. pp 181-236. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Majdi H, Smucker A J M and Persson H 1992 A comparison between minirhizotron and monolith sampling methods for measuring root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 147, 127-134.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall J D and Waring R H 1985 Predicting fine root production and turnover by monitoring root starch and soil temperature. Can. J. For. Res. 15, 791-800.Google Scholar
  55. McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1982 The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63, 1481-1490.Google Scholar
  56. McMichael B L and Taylor H M 1987 Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 1-13. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  57. McQueen D R 1968 The quantitative distribution of absorbing roots of Pinus silvestris and Fagus sylvatica in a forest succession. Oecol. Plant. 3, 83-99.Google Scholar
  58. Meier C E, Grier C C and Cole D W 1985 Below-and above-ground N and P used by young and mature Abies amabilis stands. Ecology 66, 1928-1942.Google Scholar
  59. Milchunas D G and Lauenroth W K 1992 Carbon dynamics and estimates of primary production by harvest, 14C dilution, and 14C turnover. Ecology 73, 593-607.Google Scholar
  60. Mooney H A 1972 The carbon balance of plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 315-346.Google Scholar
  61. Muller R N, Kalisz P J and Luken J O 1989 Fine root production of astringent phenolics. Oecol. 79, 563-565.Google Scholar
  62. Nadelhoffer K J, Aber J D and Mellilo J M 1985 Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: A new hypothesis. Ecology 66, 1377-1390.Google Scholar
  63. Nadkarni N M 1981 Canopy roots: convergent evolution in rainforest nutrient cycles. Science 214, 1023-1024.Google Scholar
  64. Nambiar E K S 1987 Do nutrients retranslocate from fine roots? Can. J. For. Res. 17, 913-918.Google Scholar
  65. Neill C 1992 Comparison of soil coring and ingrowth methods for measuring belowground production. Ecology 73, 1918-1921.Google Scholar
  66. Nepstad D C, Carvalho C R de, Davidson E A, Jipp P H, Lefebvre P A, Negreiros G H, Silva E D da, Stone T A, Trumbore S E and Vieira S 1994 The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 372, 666-669.Google Scholar
  67. Persson H 1978 Root dynamics in a young Scots pine stand in central Sweden. OIKOS 30, 508-519.Google Scholar
  68. Persson H 1983 The distribution and productivity of fine roots in boreal forests. Plant Soil 71, 87-101.Google Scholar
  69. Persson H 1984 The dynamic fine roots of forest trees. In State and Change of Forest Ecosystems — Indicators in Current Research. Ed. G I Ågren. pp 193-204. Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci. Dept Ecology and Environmental Research Report no. 13.Google Scholar
  70. Persson H, Von Fircks Y, Majdi H and Nilsson L O 1995 Root distribution in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand subjected to drought and ammonium-sulphate application. Plant Soil 168-169, 161–165.Google Scholar
  71. Persson H and Baitulin I (Eds.) 1996 Plant Root Systems and Natural Vegetation. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 81. 131 p. Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  72. Pregitzer K S, Zak D R, Curtis P S, Kubiske M E, Teeri J A and Vogel C S 1995 Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots. New Phytol. 129, 579-585.Google Scholar
  73. Publicover D and Vogt K A 1992 Belowground ecology of forests. In McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology. Ed. S P Parker. pp 427-429. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  74. Publicover D A and Vogt K A 1993 A comparison of methods for estimating forest fine root production with respect to sources of error. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 1179-1186.Google Scholar
  75. Raich J W and Nadelhoffer K J 1989 Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: Global trends. Ecology 70, 1346-1354.Google Scholar
  76. Rendig V V and Taylor H M 1989 Principles of Soil-Plant Interrelationships. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York. 275 p.Google Scholar
  77. Roy S and Singh J S 1995 Seasonal and spatial dynamics of plant-available N and P pools and N-mineralization in relation to fine roots in a dry tropical forest habitat. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 33-40.Google Scholar
  78. Ruark G A and Bockheim J G 1987 Below-ground biomass of 10-, 20-, and 32-year-old Populus tremuloides in Wisconsin. Pedobiologia 30, 207-217.Google Scholar
  79. Ruark G A, Mader D L and Tattar T A 1982 The influence of soil compaction and aeration on the root growth and vigour of trees — a literature review. Part 1. Arboricultural J. 6, 251-265.Google Scholar
  80. Rygiewicz P T and Andersen C P 1994 Mycorrhizae alter quality and quantity of carbon allocated below ground. Nature 369, 58-60.Google Scholar
  81. Sala O E, Biondini M E and Lauenroth W K 1988 Bias in estimates of primary production: an analytical solution. Ecol. Modelling 44, 43-55.Google Scholar
  82. Sanford R L Jr 1987 Apogeotropic roots in an Amazon rain forest. Science 235, 1062-1064.Google Scholar
  83. Santantonio D and Grace J C 1987 Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition data: a compartment-flow model. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 900-908.Google Scholar
  84. Santantonio D and Hermann R K 1985 Standing crop, production, and turnover of fine roots on dry, moderate, and wet sites of mature Douglas-fir in western Oregon. Ann. Sci. For. 42, 113-142.Google Scholar
  85. Santantonio D 1990 Modeling growth and production of tree roots. In Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress. Eds. R K Dixon, R S Meldahl, G A Ruark and W G Warren. pp 124-141. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  86. Schwab S M, Menge J A and Leonard R T 1983 Quantitative and qualitative effects of phosphorus on extracts and exudates of sudangrass in relation to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza formation. Plant Physiol. 73, 761-765.Google Scholar
  87. Singh J S, Lauenroth W K, Hunt H W, and Swift D M 1984 Bias and random errors in estimators of net root production: A simulation approach. Ecology 65, 1760-1764.Google Scholar
  88. Smucker A J M, Ferguson J C, DeBruyn W P, Belford R L and Ritchie J T 1987 Image analysis of video-recorded plant root systems. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 67-80. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  89. Sprugel D G, Ryan M G, Brooks J R, Vogt K A, and Martin T A 1995 Respiration from the organ level to the stand. In Resource Physiology of Conifers-Acquisition, Allocation, and Utilization. Eds. W K Smith and T M Hinckley. pp 255-299. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  90. St. John T V, Coleman D C and Reid C P P 1983 Growth and spatial distribution of nutrient-absorbing organs: selective exploitation of soil heterogeneity. Plant Soil 71, 487-493.Google Scholar
  91. Stone E L and Kalisz P J 1991 On the maximum extent of tree roots. For. Ecol. Manage. 46, 59-102.Google Scholar
  92. Taylor H M 1987 Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI. 143 p.Google Scholar
  93. Taylor J 1993 The mutable carbon sink. Nature 366, 515-516.Google Scholar
  94. Upchurch D R and Richie J T 1983 Root observations using a video recording system in minirhizotrons. Agron. J. 75, 1009-1015.Google Scholar
  95. Van der Werf A, Poorter H and Lambers H 1994 Respiration as dependent on a species inherent growth rate and on the nitrogen supply to the plant. In A Whole Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. Eds. J Roy and E Garnier. pp 91-110. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  96. Van Noordwijk M 1983 Functional interpretation of root densities in the field for nutrient and water uptake. In Wurzelokologie und Ihre Nutzanwendung. Eds. W Böhm, L Kutschera and E Lichtenegger. pp 207-226. BVA Gumpenstein, Irdning, Austria.Google Scholar
  97. Van Praag H J, Sougnez-Remy S, Weissen F and Carletti G 1988 Root turnover in a beech and a spruce stand of the Belgian Ardennes. Plant Soil 105, 87-103.Google Scholar
  98. Vogt K A and Staffeldt E E 1977 Fungal degradation of pure and mixed carbon substrates. Develop. in Industr. Micro. 18, 571-580.Google Scholar
  99. Vogt K A, Grier C C, Edmonds R L and Meier C E 1982 Mycorrhizal role in net primary production and nutrient cycling in Abies amabilis [Dougl.] Forbes ecosystems in western Washington. Ecology 63, 370-380.Google Scholar
  100. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E, Littke W, Grier C C, and Leney L 1985 Estimating Douglas-fir fine root biomass and production from living bark and starch. Can. J. For. Res. 15, 177-179.Google Scholar
  101. Vogt K A, Grier C C, Gower S T, Sprugel D G, and Vogt D J 1986a Overestimation of net root production: A real or imaginary problem? Ecology 67, 577-579.Google Scholar
  102. Vogt K A, Grier C C and Vogt D J 1986b Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above-and belowground detritus of world forests. Adv. Ecol. Res., 15, 303-377.Google Scholar
  103. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E, Fatuga B A, Redlin M R and Edmonds R L 1987 Conifer and angiosperm fine-root biomass in relation to stand age and site productivity in Douglas-fir forests. Ecology 75, 857-870.Google Scholar
  104. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Moore E E and Sprugel D G 1989 Methodological considerations in measuring biomass, production, respiration and nutrient resorption for tree roots in natural ecosystems. In Applications of Continuous and Steady-State Methods to Root Biology. Eds. J G Torrey and L J Winship. pp 217-232. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  105. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Gower S T and Grier C C 1990 Carbon and nitrogen interactions for forest ecosystems. In Above-and Below-ground Interactions in Forest Trees in Acidified Soils. Ed. H Persson. pp 203-235. Air pollution Report 32. Commission of the European Communities. Directorate-General for Science, Research and Development. Environment Research Programme, Brussels.Google Scholar
  106. Vogt K A and Bloomfield J 1991 Root turnover and senescence. In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eschel and U Kafkafi. pp 287-306. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  107. Vogt K A and Persson H 1991 Root methods. In Techniques and Approaches in Forest Tree Ecophysiology. Eds. J P Lassoie and T M Hinckley. pp 477-502. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  108. Vogt K A, Vogt D J and Bloomfield J 1991 Input of organic matter to the soil by tree roots. In Plant Roots and Their Environment. Eds. H Persson and B L McMichael. pp 171-190. Elsevier Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  109. Vogt K A, Bloomfield J, Perez J M, Vogt D J and Silver W L 1993 Belowground responses as indicators of environmental change. Environ. Experimental Bot. 33, 189-205.Google Scholar
  110. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Asbjornsen H and Dahlgren R A 1995 Roots, nutrients and their relationship to spatial patterns. Plant Soil 168-169, 113–123.Google Scholar
  111. Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Palmiotto P A, Boon P, O'Hara J and Asbjornsen H 1996 Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187, 159-219.Google Scholar
  112. Waisel Y 1972 Biology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York. 395 p.Google Scholar
  113. Waisel Y, Eshel A and Kafkafi U 1991 Plant Roots. The Hidden Half. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 948 p.Google Scholar
  114. Waring R H and Schlesinger W H 1985 Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. 340 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristiina A. Vogt
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Vogt
    • 1
  • Janine Bloomfield
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Defense FundUSA

Personalised recommendations