Plant and Soil

, Volume 205, Issue 2, pp 135–146 | Cite as

Soil CO2 efflux and its spatial variation in a Florida slash pine plantation

  • C. Fang
  • John B. Moncrieff
  • Henry L. Gholz
  • Kenneth L. Clark

Abstract

The efflux of CO2 from the soil surface can vary markedly in magnitude both in time and space and its correct determination is crucial in many ecological studies. In this paper, we report results of field measurements, using an open-top dynamic chamber, of soil CO2 efflux in a mature Florida slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var.elliottii) plantation. The daily average efflux was 0.217 mg CO2 m-2s-1 in the autumn and 0.087 mg CO2 m-2s-1 in the winter. Soil temperature, which accounts for most of the temporal variability in CO2 efflux, is by far the most influential factor controlling soil respiration rate and its temporal variation. The CO2 efflux in the slash pine plantation is highly spatially variable and effluxes from the soil under palmetto is significantly higher than that from the open floor. The CO2 efflux generally increases with increase in soil fine root biomass, litter and humus amount on the forest floor but is inversely related to the amount of organic matter in the mineral soil. The spatial variation in CO2 efflux can be well characterised by a simple multiple regression model incorporating live and dead biomass and soil total porosity as predictor variables. Understorey plants, mostly Serenoa repens, are an important component of the C cycle and the major contributor to the spatial heterogeneity of soil CO2 efflux. The influence of understorey plants on soil respiration is probably via two approaches: increasing litterfall and root metabolism, both consequently stimulating microbial activity in the mineral soil.

multiple regression model slash pine plantation soil respiration spatial variability of CO2 efflux 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behera N, Joshi S K and Pati D 1990 Root contribution to total soil metabolism in a tropical soil from Orissa, India. For. Ecol. Manag. 36, 125-134.Google Scholar
  2. Bridgham S D and Richardson C J 1992 Mechanisms controlling soil respiration (CO2 and NH4) in southern peatlands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 279-286.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell G S 1985 Soil Physics with Basic: Transport Models for Soil-plant Systems. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Carlyle J C and Than U B 1988 Abiotic controls of soil respiration beneath an eighteen-year-old pinus radiata stand in south-eastern Australia. J. Ecol. 76, 654-662.Google Scholar
  5. Castro M S Peterjohn W T Melillo J M Steudler P A Gholz H L and Lewis D 1994 Effects ofnitrogen fertilization on the fluxes of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from soils in a Florida slash pine plantation. Can. J. For. Res. 24, 9-13.Google Scholar
  6. Chapman S B 1979 Some interrelationships between soil and root respiration in lowland Calluna heathland in southern England. J. Ecol. 67, 1-20.Google Scholar
  7. Crill P M 1991 Seasonal patterns of methane uptake and carbon dioxide release by atemperate woodland soil. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 5, 319-314.Google Scholar
  8. Cropper W P Jr Ewel K C and Raich J W 1985 The measurement of soil CO2evolution in situ. Pedobiologia 28, 35-40.Google Scholar
  9. Dugas W A 1993 Micrometeorological and chamber measurements of CO2 flux from baresoil. Agri. For. Meteo. 67, 115-128.Google Scholar
  10. Ewel K C, Cropper W P Jr and Gholz H L 1987a Soil CO2 evolution in Florida slash pineplantation I. Changes through time. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 325-329. Ewel K C, Cropper W P Jr and Gholz H L 1987b Soil CO2 evolution in Florida slash pineplantation. II. Importance of root respiration. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 330–333.Google Scholar
  11. Fang C and Moncrieff J B 1998a An open-top chamber for measuring soil respiration and the influence of pressure difference on CO2 efflux measurement. Functional Ecol. 12, 319-326.Google Scholar
  12. Fang C and Moncrieff J B 1998b A model for soil CO2 production and transport. 1: Model development. Submitted to Agric. For. Meteorol.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher H M and Stone E L 1990 Air-conducting porosity in slash pine roots from saturated soils. For. Sci. 36, 18-33.Google Scholar
  14. Garret H and Cox G 1973 Carbon dioxide evolution from the floor of an oak-hickoryforest. Soil Sci. Soc. Ame. Proc. 37, 641-647.Google Scholar
  15. Gholz H L and Fisher R F 1982 Organic matter production and distribution in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantations. Ecology 63, 1827-1839.Google Scholar
  16. Gholz H L and Fisher R F 1984 The limits to productivity: fertilization and nutrientcycling in coastal plain slash pine forests. In Forest Soils and Treatment Impacts, Ed. E. L. Stone Proceedings of the Sixth North American Forest Soils Conference, 1983 The University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN.Google Scholar
  17. Gholz H L, Hendry L C and Cropper W P Jr 1986 Organic matter dynamics of fine roots in plantations of slash pine (pinus elliottii) in north Florida. Can. J. For. Res. 16, 529-538.Google Scholar
  18. Gholz H L, Vogel S A, Cropper W P Jr, Mckelvey K, Ewel K C, Teskey R O and Curran P J 1991 Dynamics of canopy structure and light interception in Pinus elliottii stands, north Florida. Ecol. Monogr. 61, 33-51.Google Scholar
  19. Hanson P J, Wullschleger S D, Bohlman S A and Todd D E 1993 Seasonal and topographic patterns of forest floor CO2 efflux from an upland oak forest. Tree Physiol. 13, 1-15.Google Scholar
  20. Howard D M and Howard P J A 1993 Relationships between CO2 evolution, moisturecontent and temperature for a range of soil types. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 1537-1546.Google Scholar
  21. Hunt H W 1977 A simulation model for decomposition in grasslands. Ecology 58, 469-484.Google Scholar
  22. Kim J and Verma S B 1992 Soil surface CO2 flux in a Minnesota peatland. Biogeochemistry 18, 37-51.Google Scholar
  23. Lloyd J and Taylor J A 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Func. Ecol. 8, 315-323.Google Scholar
  24. Massmann J and Ferrier D F 1992 Effects of atmospheric pressure on gas transport in the vadose zone. Water Resources Res. 28, 777-791.Google Scholar
  25. Moncrieff J B and Fang C 1998. A model for soil CO2 production and transport. 2: Application to a Florida Pinus elliotte plantation. Submitted to Agric. For. Meteorol.Google Scholar
  26. Oberbauer S F, Gillespie C T, Cheng W, Gebauer R, Sala Serra A and Tenhunen J D 1992 Environmental effects on CO2 efflux from riparian tundra in the northern foothills of the Brooks Range, Alaska, USA. Oecologia 92, 568-577.Google Scholar
  27. Peterjohn W T, Melillo J M, Steudler P A, Newkirk K M, Bowles F P and Aber J D 1994 Response of trace gas fluxes and N availability to experimentally elevated soil temperature. Ecol. Applic. 4, 617-625.Google Scholar
  28. Raich J W, Bowden R D and Steudler P A 1990 Comparison of two static chamber techniques for determining carbon dioxide efflux from forest soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Ame. J. 54, 1754-1757.Google Scholar
  29. Raich J W and Schlesinger W H 1992 The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to climate. Tellus 44B, 81-99.Google Scholar
  30. Rajvanshi R and Gupta S R 1986 Soil respiration and carbon balance in a tropical Dalbergiasissoo forest ecosystem. Flora 178, 251-260.Google Scholar
  31. Rout S K and Gupta S R 1989 Soil respiration in relation to abiotic factors, forest floor litter, root biomass and litter quality in forest ecosystems of Siwaliks in north India. Acta Oecol./Oecol. Plant. 10, 229-244.Google Scholar
  32. Sokal R R and Rohlf F J 1995 Biometry: The Principles and Practice of statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. W H Freeman and Company, New York, pp 634-654.Google Scholar
  33. Thierron V and Laudelout H 1996 Contribution of root respiration to total CO2 efflux from the soil of a deciduous forest. Can. J. For. Res. 26, 1142-1148.Google Scholar
  34. Vose J M, Elliott K J, Johnson D W, Walker R F, Johnson M G and Tingey D T 1995 Effects of elevated CO2 and N fertilization on soil respiration from ponderosa pine (pinus ponderosa) in open-top chambers. Can. J. For. Res. 25, 1243-1251.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Fang
    • 1
  • John B. Moncrieff
    • 1
  • Henry L. Gholz
    • 2
  • Kenneth L. Clark
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Ecology and Resource ManagementUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.School of Forest Resources and ConservationInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations