Plant and Soil

, Volume 198, Issue 1, pp 19–31 | Cite as

Fine root turnover of irrigated hedgerow intercropping in Northern Kenya

  • Johannes Lehmann
  • Wolfgang Zech


Fine root turnover (<2 mm) was determined from repeated measurements of root distribution up to 120 cm soil depth by core sampling in four month intervals. Sole cropped Sorghum bicolor and Acacia saligna were compared with the agroforestry combination in an alley cropping system in semiarid Northern Kenya. Three methods for the calculation of root production were used: the max-min, balancing-transfer and compartment-flow method. The highest root biomass was found in the topsoil for all cropping systems, though trees had a deeper root system. Trees and crops had a similar amount of below-ground biomass during the vegetation period (0.3 and 0.4 Mg DM ha-1 120 cm-1), but in the agroforestry combination root biomass was more than the sum of the sole cropped systems (1.1 Mg DM ha-1 120 cm-1). The tree system showed a very static root development with little fluctuation between seasons, whereas root biomasses were very dynamic in the crop and tree + crop systems. Root production was highest in the tree + crop combination with 2.1 Mg DM ha-1 a-1, with about 50% less in sole cropped trees and crops. Root N input to soil decreased in the order tree + crop>tree>crop system with 13.5, 11.0 and 3.2 kg N ha-1 a-1, and cannot be estimated from total below-ground biomass or carbon turnover, as N is accumulated in senescing roots. Such low N input to soil stresses the need for investigating other processes of nutrient input from roots to soil. Areas of highest N input were identified in the topsoil under the tree row in the tree system. Resource utilisation and C and N input to soil were highest with a combination of annual and perennial crops.

Acacia saligna agroforestry nitrogen root decomposition root distribution root turnover Sorghum bicolor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Fairley R I and Alexander I J 1985 Methods of calculating fine root production in forests. In Ecological Interactions in Soil. Eds. A H Fitter, D Atkinson, D J Read and M B Usher. pp 37–42. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. FAO 1990 Soil map of the world, revised legend. FAO, Rome, Italy. 119 p.Google Scholar
  3. Fogel R 1983 Root turnover and productivity of coniferous forests. Plant Soil 71, 75–85.Google Scholar
  4. Fredericksen T S and Zedaker S M 1995 Fine root biomass, distribution, and production in young pine-hardwood stands. New Forests 10, 99–110.Google Scholar
  5. Grayston S J, Vaughan D and Jones D 1996 Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl. Soil Ecol. 5, 29–56.Google Scholar
  6. Haggar J P, Tanner E V J, Beer J W and Kass D C L 1993 Nitrogen dynamics of tropical agroforestry and annual cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 1363–1378.Google Scholar
  7. Hamel C and Smith D L 1991 Interspecific N-transfer and plant development in a mycorrhizal field-grown mixture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 661–665.Google Scholar
  8. Heal O W, Anderson J M and Swift M J 1997 Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. Eds. G Cadisch and K E Giller. pp 3–32. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman M T and Mitchell D T 1986 The root morphology of some legume spp. in the south-western Cape and the relationship of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas with dry mass and phosphorus content of Acacia saligna seedlings. S. Afr. J. Bot. 52, 316–320.Google Scholar
  10. Ikram A, Jensen E S and Jakobson I 1994 No significant transfer of N and P from Pueraria phaseloides to Hevea brasiliensis via hyphal links of arbuscular mycorrhiza. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1541–1547.Google Scholar
  11. Kummerow J, Castillanos J, Maas M and Larigauderie A 1990 Production of fine roots and seasonality of their growth in a Mexican deciduous dry forest. Vegetatio. 90, 73–80.Google Scholar
  12. Lehmann J, Droppelmann K and Zech W 1997a Runoff irrigation of crops with contrasting root and shoot development in Northern Kenya: water depletion and above-and below-ground biomass production. J. Arid Environm. (In press).Google Scholar
  13. Lehmann J, Peter I, Steglich C, Gebauer G, Huwe B and Zech W 1997b Below-ground interactions in dryland agroforestry. For. Ecol. Manage. (Submitted).Google Scholar
  14. Lehmann J, Poidy N, Schroth G and Zech W 1997c Short-term effects of soil amendment with legume tree biomass on carbon and nitrogen in particle size separates in central Togo. Soil Biol. Biochem. (In press).Google Scholar
  15. Lehmann J, Weigl D, Droppelmann K, Goldbach H, Gebauer G and Zech W 1997d Nutrient interactions of alley-cropped Sorghum bicolor and Acacia saligna with runoff irrigation in Northern Kenya. Ecol. Appl. (Submitted).Google Scholar
  16. Lehmann J, Schroth G and Zech W 1995 Decomposition and nutrient release from leaves, twigs and roots of three alley-cropped tree legumes in central Togo. Agrofor. Syst. 29, 21–36.Google Scholar
  17. Lehmann J and Zech W 1997 Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Ertragssteigerung in tropischen alley-cropping Systemen. In Leguminosen zur Verbesserung und nachhaltigen Sicherung der Agrarproduktion. Giessener Beiträge zur Entwicklungsforschung Vol. 24. (In press).Google Scholar
  18. Little T M and Hills F J 1978 Agricultural Experimentation. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 350 p.Google Scholar
  19. Mayaki W C, Stone L R and Teare I D 1976 Irrigated and nonirrigated soybean, corn, and grain sorghum root systems. Agron. J. 68, 532–534.Google Scholar
  20. Nambiar E K S 1987 Do nutrients retranslocate from fine roots. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 913–918.Google Scholar
  21. Nye P H and Greenland D J 1960 The Soil under Shifting Cultivation. Harpenden, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, UK. 144 p.Google Scholar
  22. Persson H 1978 Root dynamics in a young Scots pine stand in central Sweden. Oikos 30, 508–519.Google Scholar
  23. Publicover D A and Vogt K A 1993 A comparison of methods for estimating fine root production with respect to sources of error. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 1179–1186.Google Scholar
  24. Sanchez P A 1995 Science in Agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 30, 5–55.Google Scholar
  25. Sandhu J M, Sinha M S and Ambasht R S 1990 Nitrogen release from decomposing litter of Leucaena leucocephala in the dry tropics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 859–863.Google Scholar
  26. Santantonio D and Grace J C 1987 Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition data: a compartment-flow model. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 900–908.Google Scholar
  27. Schroth G and Lehmann J 1995 Contrasting effects of roots and mulch from three agroforestry tree species on yields of alley cropped maize. Agric. Ecosyst. Environm. 54, 89–101.Google Scholar
  28. Schroth G and Zech W 1995 Above-and below-ground biomass dynamics in a sole cropping and an alley cropping system with Gliricidia sepium in the semi-deciduous rainforest zone of West Africa. Agrofor. Syst. 31, 181–198.Google Scholar
  29. Smucker A J M, Ellis B G and Kang B T 1995 Alley cropping on an alfisol in the rainforest savanna transition zone: root, nutrient, and water dynamics. In Alley Farming Research and Development. Eds. B T Kang, O A Osiname and A Lorbi. pp 103–121. Alley Farming Network for Tropical Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  30. Sundarapandian S M and Swamy P S 1996 Fine root biomass distribution and productivity patterns under open and closed canopies of tropical forest ecosystems at Kodayar in Western Ghats, South India. For. Ecol. Manage. 86, 181–192.Google Scholar
  31. Torquebiau E F and Kwesiga F 1996 Root development in a Sesbania sesban fallow-maize system in Eastern Zambia. Agrofor. Syst. 34, 193–211.Google Scholar
  32. Vogt K A, Vogt D J and Bloomfield J 1991 Input of organic matter to the soil by tree roots. In Plant Roots and their Environment. Eds. B L McMichael and H Persson. pp 171–190. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  33. Young A 1991 Agroforestry for soil conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 276 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Lehmann
    • 1
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Zech
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil Science and Soil GeographyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations