Plant and Soil

, Volume 200, Issue 1, pp 107–112 | Cite as

Portable rhizotron and color scanner system for monitoring root development

  • W.L. Pan
  • R.P. Bolton
  • E.J. Lundquist
  • L.K. Hiller
Article

Abstract

Rhizotrons allow the examination of spatial and temporal in situ root development. Permanent rhizotron installations provide 2-D images of whole root profiles, but their immobility limits the number of soil-plant systems that can be studied. Our objectives were to develop a portable rhizotron and color scanning system for studying the development of whole root systems. Potato root development was monitored in an irrigated experiment at Othello, WA. Covered, rectangular hollow boxes with a transparent glass face were installed perpendicular to planted potato rows, and a seed piece was planted in the soil adjacent to the glass. Rooting in the hill furrow topography was measured at 2 to 4 week intervals. Images of roots growing along the glass face are captured with five scans with a portable, color scanner and a portable computer. Image thresholding discriminated roots from soil using primary color values, color intensity differences, color proportions, or overall intensity. Seasonal patterns of computed root lengths by image analysis were comparable to manual tracing. Primary roots extended to 15 cm from the seed piece prior to shoot emergence, 21 days after planting. Lateral roots began to develop shortly thereafter. Potato roots extended to depths of 60 cm by 4 to 6 weeks after planting, and maximum root density in the hill and furrow was observed by tuber initiation to early tuber bulking. Temporal and spatial trends were similar to previous results using destructive sampling. The method has promise for studying the root growth and development of field-grown plants.

computer imaging portable rhizotron potato root 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates G H 1937 A device for the observation of root growth in the soil. Nature (London) 139, 966-967.Google Scholar
  2. Bohm W 1974 Methods of Studying Root Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bolton R P, Pan W L and Lundquist E J 1993 Analysis of computerized rhizotron images created with portable scanners. In Agronomy Abstracts. p 67. ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Box J E Jr, Smucker A J M and Ritchie J T 1989 Minirhizotron installation techniques for investigating root responses to drought and oxygen stresses. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 115-118.Google Scholar
  5. Bragg P L, Govi G and Cannell R Q 1983 A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant Soil 73, 435-440.Google Scholar
  6. Brown D A and Upchurch D R 1987 Minirhizotrons: A summary of methods and instruments in current use. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H Taylor. pp 15-30. ASA Spec. Publ. 50. ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  7. Cheng W, Coleman D C and Box J E Jr 1991 Measuring root turnover using the minirhizotron technique. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 34, 261-267.Google Scholar
  8. Doty J, Kennedy A C and Pan W L 1995 A rapid bioassay for inhibitory rhizobacteria using digital image analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1699-1701.Google Scholar
  9. Glinski D S, Karnok K J and Carrow R N 1993 Comparison of reporting methods for root growth data from transparent-interface measurements. Crop Sci. 33, 310-314.Google Scholar
  10. Heeraman D A and Juma N G 1993 A comparison of minirhizotron, core and monolith methods for quantifying barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.) root distribution. Plant Soil 148, 25-41.Google Scholar
  11. Huck M G and Taylor H M 1982 The rhizotron as a tool for root research. Adv. Agron. 35, 1-35.Google Scholar
  12. Majdi H, Smucker A J M and Persson H 1992 A comparison between minirhizotron and monolith sampling methods for measuring root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 147, 127-134.Google Scholar
  13. McMichael B L and Taylor H M 1987 Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H Taylor. pp 1-13. ASA Spec. Publ. 50. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  14. Meisner C A and Karnok K J 1992 Peanut root response to drought stress. Agron. J. 84, 155-165.Google Scholar
  15. Pan W L and Hiller L K 1992 Growth and development of potato root types: Implications for placement and timing strategies in fertility management. In Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Washington State Potato Conference. pp 105-111. Moses Lake, WA.Google Scholar
  16. Pan W L and Bolton R P 1991 Root quantification by edge descrimination using a desktop scanner. Agron. J. 83, 104-1052.Google Scholar
  17. Parker C J, Carr M V K, Jarvis N J, Puplampu B O and Lee V H 1991 An evaluation of the minirhizotron technique for estimating root distribution in potatoes. J. Agric. Sci. 116, 341-350.Google Scholar
  18. Samson B K and Sinclair TR 1994 Soil core and minirhizotron comparison for the determination of root length density. Plant Soil 161, 225-232.Google Scholar
  19. Smith A L, Groenwold J and Vos J 1994 The Wageningen Rhizolab — facility to study soil-root-shoot atmosphere interactions in crops. II. Methods of root observations. Plant Soil 161, 289-298.Google Scholar
  20. Smucker A M J 1992 Root Absorption Efficiencies. In The Plant Root Environment, 1992 Abstracts of the Southern Region Information Exchange Group (SREIG-25). Eds. W Busscher and P Porter. p 16. USDA-ARS, Coastal Plains Research Center, Florence, SC.Google Scholar
  21. Smucker A J M, Ferguson J C, DeBruyn W P, Belford R K and Ritchie J T, 1987 Image Analysis of Video-Recorded Plant Root Systems. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H Taylor. pp 67-80. ASA Spec. Publ. 50. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor H M, Huck M G, Klepper B and Lund Z F 1970 Measurement of soil-grown roots in a rhizotron. Agron. J. 62, 807-809.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor H M and Klepper B 1974 Water relations of cotton. I. Root growth and water use as related to top growth and soil water content. Agron. J. 66, 584-588.Google Scholar
  24. Upchurch D R and J T Ritchie 1983 Battery-operated color video camera for root observations in mini-rhizotrons. Agron. J. 76, 1015-1017.Google Scholar
  25. Vos J and Groenwold J 1983 Estimation of root densities by observation tubes and endoscope. Plant Soil 74, 295-300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • W.L. Pan
    • 1
  • R.P. Bolton
    • 1
  • E.J. Lundquist
    • 1
  • L.K. Hiller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture and Landscape ArchitectureWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations