Philosophical Studies

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 141–160 | Cite as

Is Mereology Ontologically Innocent?

  • Byeong-Uk Yi
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Baxter, D.L.M. (1988a): ‘Identity in the Loose and Popular Sense’, Mind 97, 575–582.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter, D.L.M. (1988b): ‘Many One Identity’, Philosophical Papers 17, 193–216.Google Scholar
  3. Leonard, H.S. and N. Goodman (1940): ‘The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.Google Scholar
  4. Lewis, D. (1991): Parts of Classes, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Rosenberg, J.F. (1997): ‘Comments on Byeong-uk Yi: “Is MereologyOntologically Innocent?”’, presented in The American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division Meeting (March, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. Tarski, A. (1956): ‘Foundations of the Geometry of Solids’, in his Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, pp. 24–29, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. (1983), 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  7. van Inwagen, P. (1990): Material Beings, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. van Inwagen, P. (1994): ‘Composition as identity’, in J.E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 8, Logic and Language, pp. 207–220, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
  9. Yi, Byeonguk (1995): Understanding the Many, UCLA Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan: UMI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byeong-Uk Yi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations