Journal of Engineering Mathematics

, Volume 31, Issue 2–3, pp 285–303 | Cite as

On the mechanics of the arrow: Archer's Paradox

  • B.W. Kooi
  • J.A. Sparenberg
Article

Abstract

In ancient bows the grip of the bow was in the way of the arrow. The arrow needed to get round the bow while being accelerated; this phenomenon is called the ‘Archer's Paradox’. In the forties it was observed experimentally with high-speed cameras that the arrow vibrates in a horizontal plane perpendicular to the vertical median plane of the bow. These movements are started and controlled by the movements of the two points of contact with the bow, viz. the middle of the string in contact with the rear end of the arrow and the grip where the arrow slides along the bow. The latter contact imposes a moving-boundary condition. The numerically obtained results are satisfactorily in agreement with experimental data. The model can be used to estimate the drawing force of ancient bows of which only the contemporary arrows are available and also for the design of new archery equipment.

Archery arrow motion Archer's Paradox finite-difference technique moving-boundary problem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. N. Hickman, F. Nagler, and P. E. Klopsteg. Archery: the technical side. Redland (CA): National Field Archery Association (1947) 281pp.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Hardy. Longbow. Sparkford (Somerset, UK): Patrick Stephens Limited (1992) 244pp.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. F. Paterson. A “Mary Rose” archery symposium. Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries 26 (1983) 49–51.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Pekalski. Modelling and simulation research of the competitor-bow-arrow system (in Polish). PhD thesis, Academy of Physical Education, Warsaw (1987) 122pp.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Pekalski. Experimental and theoretical research in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences 8 (1990) 259–279.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. W. Kooi. On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow. PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (1983) 211pp.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. W. Kooi and J. A. Sparenberg. On the static deformation of a bow. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 14 (1980) 27–45.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. W. Kooi. On the mechanics of the bow and arrow. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 15 (1981) 119–145.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. W. Kooi. On the mechanics of the modern working-recurve bow. Computational Mechanics 8 (1991) 291–304.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Gallozzi, L. M. Leonardi, A. Pace, and G. Caselli. A new method to measure lateral bow accelerations during shooting in archery. In: G. Bergmann, R. Kölbel, and A. Rohlmann (eds.), Biomechanics: Basic and Applied Research (1987) pp. 639–644.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. M. Leonardi, C. Gallozzi, A. Pace, and A. Dal Monte. Reduction of lateral bow displacement using different torque flight compensators and stabilizers in archery. In: G. Bergmann, R. Kölbel, and A. Rohlmann, editors, Biomechanics: Basic and Applied Research (1987) pp. 633–638.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • B.W. Kooi
    • 1
  • J.A. Sparenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.KudelstaartThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations