Plant and Soil

, Volume 188, Issue 2, pp 257–266

The persistence of bioluminescent Rhizobium meliloti strains L1 (RecA-) and L33 (RecA+) in non-sterile microcosms depends on the soil type, on the co-cultivation of the host legume alfalfa and on the presence of an indigenous R. meliloti population

  • Margit Hagen
  • Alfred Pühler
  • Werner Selbitschka


In comparative analyses the influence of soil type, the rhizosphere of plants and the presence of an indigenous R. meliloti population on the population dynamics of bioluminescent R. meliloti strains L1 (RecA-) and L33 (RecA+) was assessed in microcosm studies. Both strains established better in a loamy and a clayey soil compared to a sandy soil. RecA- strain L1 showed a slightly but statistically significant reduced survival ability compared to RecA+ strain L33 (p ≤ 0.05). The presence of the host plant alfalfa stimulated the growth of both strains in non-sterile soil and no differences in the survival between both strains were observed. Co-cultivation of clover or wheat plants, respectively, neither positively nor negatively influenced the strains' survival. The most pronounced effect on the survival of both strains was exerted by the presence of an indigenous R. meliloti population. RecA- strain L1 showed a significantly impaired survival compared to RecA+ strain L33 (p ≤ 0.002). Moreover, no growth stimulation of strains L1 and L33 by the presence of the host plant alfalfa could be observed. These results indicate that the recA mutation affects the long-term rather than the short-term persistence of R. meliloti after environmental release.

biological containment firefly luciferase microcosm studies recA Rhizobium meliloti rhizosphere 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson T H and Domsch K H 1989 Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol.Biochem. 21, 471-479.Google Scholar
  2. Bosworth A H, Williams M K, Albrecht K A, Kwiatkowski R, Beynon J, Hankinson T R, Ronson C W, Cannon F, Wacek T J and Triplett E W 1994 Alfalfa yield response to inoculation with recombinant strains of Rhizobium melilotiwith an extra copy of dctABDand/ormodified nifAexpression. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3815-3832.Google Scholar
  3. Bottomley P J 1992 Ecology of Bradyrhizobiumand Rhizobium. InBiological Nitrogen Fixation. Eds. G Stacey, R H Burris and H J Evans. pp 293-348. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bromfield E S P, Wheatcroft R and Barran L R 1994 Medium for direct isolation of Rhizobium melilotifrom soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 423-428.Google Scholar
  5. Chao W-L and Alexander M 1982 Influence of soil characteristics on the survival of Rhizobiumin soils undergoing drying. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 949-952.Google Scholar
  6. Danso S K A, Keya S O and Alexander M 1975 Protozoa and the decline of Rhizobiumpopulations added to soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 21, 884-895.Google Scholar
  7. Dowling D N and Broughton W J 1986 Competition for nodulation of legumes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 40, 131-157.Google Scholar
  8. England L S, Lee H and Trevors J T 1993 Bacterial survival in soil: effect of clays and protozoa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 525-531.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer H-M 1994 Genetic regulation of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia. Microbiol. Rev. 58, 352-386.Google Scholar
  10. Habte M and Barrion M 1984 Interaction of Rhizobiumsp. with toxin-producing fungus in culture medium and in a tropical soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 1080-1083.Google Scholar
  11. Henschke R B and Schmidt F R J 1989 Survival, distribution, and gene transfer of bacteria in a compact soil microcosm system. Biol. Fertil. Soils 8, 19-24.Google Scholar
  12. Heynen C E, van Elsas J D, Kuikman P J and van Veen J A 1988 Dynamics of Rhizobium leguminosurumbiovar trifoliiintroduced into soil; the effect of bentonite clay and predation by protozoa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 20, 483-488.Google Scholar
  13. Keller M, Selbitschka W, Dammann-Kalinowski T, Niemann S, Hagen M, Dresing U, Quester I, Pühler A, Tichy H-V, Simon R, Schwieger F and Tebbe C 1994 Field release of two bioluminescent Rhizobium melilotistrains: survival, spread and interaction with the indigenous soil microflora. InThe Biosafety Results of Field Tests of genetically modified Plants and Microorganisms. Ed. D D Jones. pp 419-433. University of California, Oakland.Google Scholar
  14. Kloepper J W, Lifshitz R and Zablotowicz R M 1989 Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol. 7, 39-44.Google Scholar
  15. Kücke M, Schmid H and Spiess A 1995 A comparison of four methods for measuring roots of field crops in three contrasting soils. Plant Soil 172, 63-71.Google Scholar
  16. Lowendorf H S, Baya A M and Alexander M 1981 Survival of Rhizobiumin acid soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42, 951- 957.Google Scholar
  17. Miller J H 1972 Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 466 p.Google Scholar
  18. Moawad H A, Ellis W R and Schmidt E L 1984 Rhizosphere response as a factor in competition among three serogroups of indigenous Rhizobium japonicumfor nodulation of field-grown soybeans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 607-612.Google Scholar
  19. Molin S, Boe L, Jensen L B, Kristensen C S, Givskov M, Ramos J L and Bej A K 1993 Suicidal genetic elements and their use in biological containment of bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47, 139-166.Google Scholar
  20. Paau A S 1991 Improvement of Rhizobiuminoculants by mutation, genetic engineering and formulation. Biotechnol. Adv. 9, 173- 184.Google Scholar
  21. Paul J H and Williams H G 1995 Natural transformation in aquatic environments. InMolecular Microbial Ecology Manual. Eds. A D L Akkermans, J D van Elsas and F J de Bruijn. 5.1.1, pp 1-22. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Postma J, Hok-A-Hin C H and van Veen J A 1990a Role of microniches in protecting introduced Rhizobium leguminosarumbiovar trifoliiagainst competition and predation in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 495-502.Google Scholar
  23. Postma J, Hok-A-Hin C H and Oude Voshaar J H 1990b Influence of the inoculum density on the growth and survival of Rhizobium leguminosarumbiovar trifoliiintroduced into sterile and nonsterile loamy sand and silt loam. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 73, 49-58.Google Scholar
  24. Rhijn P and Vanderleyden J 1995 The Rhizobiumplant symbiosis. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 124-142.Google Scholar
  25. Rice W A, Penney D C and Nyborg M 1977 Effects of soil acidity on rhizobia numbers, nodulation and nitrogen fixation by alfalfa and red clover. Can. J. Soil Sci. 57, 197-203.Google Scholar
  26. Robinson A C 1967 The influence of host on soil and rhizosphere populations of clover and lucerne root nodule bacteria in the field. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 33, 207-209.Google Scholar
  27. Rolfe B G, Gresshoff P M and Shine J 1980 Rapid screening for symbiotic mutants of Rhizobiumand white clover. Plant Sci. Lett. 19, 277-284.Google Scholar
  28. Selbitschka W, Arnold W, Priefer U B, Rottschäfer T, Schmidt M, Simon R and Pühler A 1991 Characterization of rec Agenes and recAmutants of Rhizobium melilotiand Rhizobium leguminosarumbiovar viciae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 86-95.Google Scholar
  29. Selbitschka W, Pühler A and Simon R 1992 The construction of recA-deficient Rhizobium melilotiand R. leguminosarumstrains marked with gusAor luccassettes for use in risk-assessment studies. Mol. Ecol. 1, 9-19.Google Scholar
  30. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 16, 223-232.Google Scholar
  31. Somasegaran P and Hoben H J 1994 Handbook for Rhizobia. Springer Laboratory, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Stacey Gand Upchurch R G 1984 Rhizobiuminoculation of legumes. Trends Biotechnol. 2, 65-70.Google Scholar
  33. Streeter J G 1994 Failure of inoculant rhizobia to overcome the dominance of indigenous strains for nodule formation. Can. J. Microbiol. 40, 513-522.Google Scholar
  34. Thies J E, Singleton P W and Bohlool B B 1991 Influence of the size of indigenous rhizobial populations on establishment and symbiotic performarnce of introduced rhizobia on field-grown legumes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 57, 19-28.Google Scholar
  35. Tuzimura K, Watanabe I and Jia-fu S 1966 Different growth and survival of Rhizobiumspecies in the rhizosphere of various plants in different sorts of soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12, 15-22.Google Scholar
  36. Vincent J M 1970 A Manual for the practical Study of Root-nodule Bacteria. IBP Handbook Vol. 15. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 164 p.Google Scholar
  37. Vincent J M 1980 Factors controlling the legume-Rhizobiumsymbiosis. InNitrogen Fixation Vol. II. Eds. WE Newton and WH Orme-Johnson. pp 103-129. University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson M and Lindow S E 1993 Release of recombinant microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47, 913-944.Google Scholar
  39. Wright D A, Killham K, Glover L A and Prosser J I 1995 Role of pore size location in determining bacterial activity during predation by protozoa in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 3537-3543.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margit Hagen
    • 1
  • Alfred Pühler
    • 1
  • Werner Selbitschka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations