Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 389–434 | Cite as

Logic and the Classical Theory of Mind

  • Peter Novak
Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

I extract several common assumptions in the Classical Theory of Mind (CTM) – mainly of Locke and Descartes – and work out a partial formalisation of the logic implicit in CTM. I then define the modal (logical) properties and relations of propositions, including the modality of conditional propositions and the validity of argument, according to the principles of CTM: that is, in terms of clear and distinct ideas, and without any reference to either possible worlds, or deducibility in an axiomatic system, or linguistic convention.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ackermann, W. (1956): Begründung einer strengen Implikation, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 21, 113–128.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D., Jr., et al. (1975): Entailment: the Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Descartes, R. (1984): Meditations on First Philosophy. In Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (eds and trans.). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Geach, P. T. (1958): Entailment, The Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Vol. XXXII, 157–172.Google Scholar
  5. Leibniz, G. W. (1981): New Essays on Human Understanding, Remnant, P. and Bennett, J. (eds and trans.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Locke, J. (1975): An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Nidditch P. H., Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Novak, P. (1997): Mental Symbols: A Defence of the Classical Theory of Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Quine, W. V. O. (1951): Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1953. First published: Philosophical Review, 1951 LX, 20–43.Google Scholar
  9. Quine, W. V. O. (1953): Reference and Modality. In From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Smiley, T. J. (1959): Entailment and Deducibility, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LIX, 233–254.Google Scholar
  11. Strawson, P. F. (1948): Necessary Propositions and Entailment-Statements, Mind LVII, 184–200.Google Scholar
  12. Von Wright, G. H. (1957): The Concept of Entailment. In Logical Studies. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 166–191.Google Scholar
  13. Watling, J. (1958): Entailment, The Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Vol. XXXII, 143–156.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Novak
    • 1
  1. 1.Australia (e-mail

Personalised recommendations