Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 190, Issue 1, pp 29–40 | Cite as

Effects of CO2 and nitrogen fertilization on vegetation and soil nutrient content in juvenile ponderosa pine

  • D.W. Johnson
  • J.T. Ball
  • R.F. Walker
Article

Abstract

This paper summarizes the data on nutrient uptake and soil responses in opentop chambers planted with ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Laws.) treated with both N and CO2. Based upon the literature, we hypothesized that 1) elevated CO2 would cause increased growth and yield of biomass per unit uptake of N even if N is limiting, and 2) elevated CO2 would cause increased biomass yield per unit uptake of other nutrients only by growth dilution and only if they are non-limiting. Hypothesis 1 was supported only in part: there were greater yields of biomass per unit N uptake in the first two years of growth but not in the third year. Hypothesis 2 was supported in many cases: elevated CO2 caused growth dilution (decreased concentrations but not decreased uptake) of P, S, and Mg. Effects of elevated CO2 on K, Ca, and B concentrations were smaller and mostly non-significant. There was no evidence that N responded in a unique manner to elevated CO2, despite its unique role in rubisco. Simple growth dilution seemed to explain nutrient responses in almost all cases.

There were significant declines in soil exchangeable K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and extractable P over time which were attributed to disturbance effects associated with plowing. The only statistically significant treatment effects on soils were negative effects of elevated CO2 on mineralizeable N and extractable P, and positive effects of both N fertilization and CO2 on exchangeable Al3+. Soil exchangeable K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ pools remained much higher than vegetation pools, but extractable P pools were lower than vegetation pools in the third year of growth. There were also large losses of both native soil N and fertilizer N over time. These soil N losses could account for the observed losses in exchangeable K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ if N was nitrified and leached as NO 3 .

Ca CO2 fertilization Mg Pinus ponderosa soils 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown K R 1991 Carbon dioxide enrichment accelerates the decline in nutrient status and relative growth rate of Populus tremuloidesMichx. seedlings. Tree Physiol. 8, 161-173.Google Scholar
  2. Campagna M A and Margolis H A 1989 Influence of short-term atmospheric CO2 enrichment on growth, allocation patterns, and biochemistry of black spruce seedlings at different stages of development. Can. J. For. Res. 19, 773-782.Google Scholar
  3. Conroy J P, Milham P J, Bevege D I and Barlow E W R 1990 Influence of phosphorus deficiency on growth response of four families of Pinus radiataseedlings to CO2-enriched atmospheres. For. Ecol. Manage. 30, 175-188.Google Scholar
  4. Diaz S, Grime J P, Harris J and McPherson E 1993 Evidence of feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated carbon dioxide. Nature 364, 616-617.Google Scholar
  5. Galloway J N, Schlesinger W H, Levy H, Michaels A and Schnoor J L 1995 Nitrogen fixation: Anthropogenic enhancement environmental response. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 235- 252.Google Scholar
  6. Griffin K L, Winner W E and Strain B R 1995 Growth and dry matter partitioning in loblolly and ponderosa pine seedlings in response to carbon and nitrogen availability. New Phytol. 129, 547-556.Google Scholar
  7. H(ü)ttl R F, Fink S, Lutz H-J, Poth M and Wizniewski J 1987 Forest decline, nutrient supply, and diagnostic fertilization in southwestern Germany and southern California. IUFRO Seminar, Management of water and nutrient relations to increase forest growth. IUFRO, Canberra.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson D W 1992 Nitrogen retention in forest soils. J. Environ. Qual. 21, 1-12Google Scholar
  9. Johnson D W, Ball J T and Walker R F 1994a Effects of CO2 and nitrogen on nutrient uptake in ponderosa pine seedlings. Plant Soil 168, 144-153.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson D W, Geisinger D R, Walker R F, Vose J, Elliot K and Ball J T 1994b Soil pCO2, soil respiration, and root activity in CO2-fumigated ponderosa pine. Plant Soil 165, 111-121.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson D W and Henderson G S 1979 Sulfate adsorption and sulfur fractions in a highly-weathered soil under a mixed deciduous forest. Soil Sci. 128, 34-40.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson D W, Henderson P L, Ball J T and Walker R F 1996 Effects of CO2 and N on growth and N dynamics in ponderosa pine: Results from the first two growing seasons. InCarbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Eds. G W Koch and H A Mooney. pp 23-40. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson DW, Walker R F and Ball J T 1995a Lessons from lysimeters: Soil N release from disturbance compromises controlled environment study. Ecol. Appl. 5, 395-400.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson D W, Walker R F and Ball J T 1995b Combined effects of nitrogen and elevated CO2 on forest soils.Water Air Soil Pollut. 85, 1551-1556Google Scholar
  15. Jones J B, Wolf B and Mills H A 1991 Plant Analysis Handbook. Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc. Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  16. Kauppi P E, Mielik(á)inen K and Kuusela K 1992 Biomass and carbon budget of European Forests, 1971 to 1990. Science 256, 70-74.Google Scholar
  17. KÖrner C and Arnone J A 1992 Responses to elevated carbon dioxide in artificial tropical ecosystems. Science 257, 1672-1675.Google Scholar
  18. Luxmoore R J, Oneill E G, Ells J M and Rogers H H 1986 Nutrient uptake and growth responses of virginia pine to elevated carbon dioxide. J. Environ. Qual. 15, 244-251.Google Scholar
  19. Mann L K 1986 Changes in soil carbon storage after cultivation. Soil Sci. 142, 279-288.Google Scholar
  20. Norby R J, O'Neill E G and Luxmoore R J 1986a Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and mineral nutrition of Quercus albaseedlings in nutrient-poor soil. Plant Physiol. 82, 83-89.Google Scholar
  21. Norby R J, Pastor J and Melillo JM 1986b Carbon-nitrogen interactions in CO2-enriched white oak, physiological and long-term perspectives. Tree Physiol. 2, 233-241.Google Scholar
  22. Olsen S R, and Sommers L E 1982 Phosphorus. InMethods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Ed. Agronomy 9. Eds. A L Page, R H Miller and D R Keeney. pp 403-430. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  23. O'Neill E G, Luxmoore R J and Norby R J 1987 Elevated atmospheric CO2 effects on seedling growth, nutrient uptake, and rhizosphere bacterial populations of Liriodendron tulipiferaL. Plant Soil 104, 3-11.Google Scholar
  24. Randlett D L, Zak D R, Pregitzer K S and Curtis P S 1996 Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and leaf litter chemistry: Influences on microbial respiration and net nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 1571-1577.Google Scholar
  25. Samuelson L J and Seiler J R 1993 Interactive role of elevated CO2, nutrient limitations, and water stress in the growth responses of red spruce seedlings. For. Sci. 39, 348-358.Google Scholar
  26. Schulze E-D 1989 Air pollution and forest decline in a spruce (Picea abies) forest. Science 244, 776-783Google Scholar
  27. Stone E L 1990 Boron deficiency and excess in forest trees: A review. For. Ecol. Manage. 37, 49-75.Google Scholar
  28. Strain B R and Thomas R B 1992 Field measurements of CO2 enhancement and climate change in natural vegetation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 64, 45-60.Google Scholar
  29. Timmer V R and Stone E L 1978 Comparative foliar analysis of young balsam fir fertilized with N, P, K, and lime. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 125-130.Google Scholar
  30. Tingey D T, Johnson M G, Phillips D L and Storm M J 1995 Effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen on ponderosa pine fine roots and associated fungal components. J. Biogeogr. 22, 281-287.Google Scholar
  31. Tissue D T, Thomas R B and Strain B R 1993 Long-term effects of elevated CO2 and nutrients on photosynthesis and rubisco in loblolly pine seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 859-865.Google Scholar
  32. Turvey N D and Grant B R 1990 Copper deficiency in coniferous trees. For. Ecol. Manage. 37, 95-122Google Scholar
  33. Weetman G F 1989 Graphical vector analysis technique for testing stand nutritional status. InResearch Strategies for Long-term Site Productivity. Eds. W J Dyck and C A Mees. pp 93-109. Proceedings, IEA/BE A3 Workshop, Seattle, WA August 1988. IEA/BE A3 Report No. 8. Bull. 152. Forest Research Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Zak D R, Pregitzer K S, Curtis P S, Teeri J A, Fogel R and Randlett D L 1993 Elevated atmospheric CO2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles. Plant Soil 151, 105-117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • D.W. Johnson
    • 1
    • 2
  • J.T. Ball
    • 1
  • R.F. Walker
    • 2
  1. 1.Biological Sciences CenterDesert Research InstituteRenoUSA
  2. 2.Environmental and Resource SciencesCollege of Agriculture, University of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations