Man and World

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 271–298

Why a hermeneutical philosophy of the natural sciences?

  • Patrick A. Heelan


Why a hermeneutical philosophy of the natural sciences? It is necessary to address the philosophic crisis of realism vs relativism in the natural sciences. This crisis is seen as a part of the cultural crisis that Husserl and Heidegger identified and attributed to the hegemonic role of theoretical and calculative thought in Western societies. The role of theory is addressed using the hermeneutical circle to probe the origin of theoretic meaning in scientific cultural praxes. This is studied in Galileo's discovery of the phases of Venus; the practice of measurement; the different theories and practices of space perception; the historicality and temporality of scientific research communities which ground paradigm change; and the process of discovery. The paper draws particularly from the work of Heidegger. Though envisaging all science and scholarship, the highlighted theme is research in the natural sciences.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974. Art and Visual Perception. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Babich, Babette E. 1994a. Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. Babich, Babette E. 1994b. “Continental Philosophies of Science: Mach, Duhem, and Bachelard,” in Routledge History of Philosophy, Volume VIII, Continental Philosophy in the Twentieth-Century Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 175–221.Google Scholar
  4. Mara. 1996. “The Rhetoric of Antirealism and the Copenhagen Spirit,” Philosophy of Science, 63, pp. 183–204.Google Scholar
  5. Bly, Robert. 1996. The Sibling Society. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Braginsky, Vladimir B. and Khalili, Farid Ya. 1995. Quantum Measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (with corrections).Google Scholar
  7. Buckley, R. Philip. 1992. Husserl, Heidegger and the Crisis of Philosophical Responsibility. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Connolly, John M. and Keutner, Thomas (Editors). 1988. Hermeneutics versus Science? Three German Views. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crease, Robert. 1995. The Play of Nature. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crombie, Alastair C. 1994. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: A History of Argument and Explanation in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and the Arts. Vols. I–III. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  11. Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences. Trans. by Rudolf Makkreel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Drake, Stillman (ed. and trans.) 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  13. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Duhem, Pierre. 1914/1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Earman, John (ed.). 1992. Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fehér, Martha. 1988. “The Role of Metaphor and Analogy in the Birth of the Principle of Least Action of Maupertuis (1698–1759),” Internat. Stud. in the Philosophy of Science, 2, pp. 175–188.Google Scholar
  17. Fiumara, Gemma Corradi. 1995. The Metaphoric Process: Connections between Language and Life. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fjelland, Ragnar. 1991. “The Theory-ladenness of Observations, the Role of Scientific Instruments, and the Kantian A Priori,” Internat. Stud. in the Philosophy of Science, 5, pp. 269–280.Google Scholar
  19. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroads Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1981. Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. by Fred Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Specht, E.K., and Stegmuller, W. 1988. Hermeneutics vs Science? Three German Views. Trans. by John M. Connolly and Thomas Keutner. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  25. Grondin, Jean. 1994. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Guignon, Charles, B. 1983. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  27. Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1961. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Heelan, Patrick A. 1965. Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity: The Physical Philosophy of Werner Heisenberg. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  29. Heelan, Patrick A. 1983/1988. Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heelan, Patrick A. 1983. “Natural science as a hermeneutic of instrumentation,” Philosophy of Science, 50, pp. 181–204.Google Scholar
  31. Heelan, Patrick A. 1987. “Husserl's Later Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy of Science, 54, pp. 368–390.Google Scholar
  32. Heelan, Patrick A. 1989. “After Experiment: Research and Reality,” Amer. Philos. Qrtly., 26, #4, pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
  33. Heelan, Patrick A. 1989. “Yes! There is a Hermeneutics of Natural Science: Rejoinder to Markus,” Science in Context, 3, pp. 477–488.Google Scholar
  34. Heelan, Patrick A. 1991. “Hermeneutical Phenomenology and the History of Science,” in Nature and Scientific Method: William A. Wallace Festschrift. Ed. by Daniel Dahlstrom. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
  35. Heelan, Patrick A. 1994. “Galileo, Luther, and the Hermeneutics of Natural Science,” The Question of Hermeneutics: Festschrift for Joseph Kockelmans. Ed. by Timothy Stapleton. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer, pp. 363–375.Google Scholar
  36. Heelan, Patrick A. 1995. “An Anti-epistemological or Ontological Interpretation of the Quantum Theory and Theories Like it,” in Continental and Postmodern Perspectives in the Philosophy of Science. Ed. by B. Babich, D. Bergoffen, and S. Glynn. Aldershot/Brookfield, VT: Avebury Press, pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
  37. Heelan, Patrick A. 1996 (forthcoming). “Herméneutique de la Science Expérimentale: La Mécanique Quantique et les Sciences Sociales,” préparé pour le Séminaire de Cerisy-la-Salle, Paris, Septembre 1994, in Hermeneutique: sciences et textes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  38. Heidegger, Martin. 1927/1962. Being and Time. Trans. from the German by John Macquarrie. Oxford: Blackwell 1962. Originally published as Sein und Zeit, 1927. In the notes abbreviated to BT.Google Scholar
  39. Heidegger, Martin. 1966. Discourse on Thinking: Translation of Gelassenheit. Trans. by John Anderson and E. Hans Freund. New York: Harper and Row. In the notes abbreviated to DOT.Google Scholar
  40. Heidegger, Martin. 1967. What is a Thing? Trans. by W.B. Barton, Jr. and Vera Deutsch. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
  41. Heidegger, Martin. 1968. What is Called Thinking? Trans. by J.G. Gray. New York: Harper and Row. In the notes abbreviated to WCT.Google Scholar
  42. Heidegger, Martin. 1972. On Time and Being. Trans. by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  43. Heidegger, Martin. 1973. The End of Philosophy. Trans. by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  44. Heidegger, Martin. 1977. Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. by William Levitt. New York: Harper and Row. In the notes abbreviated to QCT.Google Scholar
  45. Hesse, Mary, and Arbib, Michael. 1986. The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Horgan, John. 1996. The End of Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  47. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 1993. Reconstruaing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Philosophy. Trans. by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Husserl, Edmund. 1900/1970. Logical Investigations, Vols. I and II. Trans. by J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  50. Husserl, Edmund. 1948/1973. Experience and Judgment. Ed. by Ludwig Landgrebe. Trans. by J.S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Kisiel, Theodore. 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kockelmans, Joseph J. 1993. Idea for a Hermeneutic of the Natural Sciences. Dordrecht/ Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  53. Kockelmans, Joseph J. 1985. Heidegger and Science.Washington, D.C.: CARP and University Press of America.Google Scholar
  54. Kockelmans, Joseph J. and Kisiel, Theodore. 1970. Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences:Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  57. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The Primacy of Perception. Ed. J. Edie. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Markus, Georgy. 1987. “Why is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Science? Some Preliminary Theses,” Science in Context, 1, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar
  60. Monroe, C., Meekhof, D.M., King, B.E. and Wineland, D.J. 1996. “A 'Schrödinger Cat' Superposition State of an Atom,” Science, vol. 272, 24 May 1996, pp. 1131–1136.Google Scholar
  61. Montgomery, Scott. 1996. The Scientific Voice. New York and London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  62. Needham, Paul. 1996. “Macroscopic Objects: An Exercise in Duhemian Ontology,” Philosophy of Science, 63, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
  63. Nickles, Thomas. 1995. “Philosophy of Science and History of Science,” Osiris, Volume 10, Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science, pp. 139–163.Google Scholar
  64. Okrent, Mark. 1988. Heidegger's Pragmatism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Pickering, Andrew. 1995. TheMangle of Truth: Time, Agency, and Science.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. Martin Heidegger's Path of Thinking. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  67. Polanyi, Michael. 1964. Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy. New York: Harper and Row Torchbook Edition.Google Scholar
  68. Richardson, William J. 1963. Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  69. Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  70. Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Ed. and Trans. by John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rehkaemper, Felix. 1995. “Perspektive ist des Malers beste Kunst,” in Logos, pp. 122–146.Google Scholar
  72. Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1987.Google Scholar
  73. Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging Seience. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Scharff, Robert. 1995. Comte After Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Schutz, Alfred. 1973. The Problem of Social Reality. Vol. 1 of Collected Papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  76. Sellars, Wilfred. 1963. Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Vattimo, Gianni. 1992. The Transparent Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick A. Heelan
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations