Hydrobiologia

, Volume 435, Issue 1–3, pp 5–17

Monitoring river health

  • Richard H. Norris
  • Charles P. Hawkins
Article
biological monitoring water quality assessment bioassessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addison, R. F. & K. R. Clarke, 1990. The IOC/GEEP Bermuda Workshop. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 138: 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, M. P., 1976. On non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33: 33–41.Google Scholar
  3. Barbour, M. T. & J. Gerritsen, 1996. Subsampling of benthic samples: a defense of the fixed-count method. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 386–391.Google Scholar
  4. Barbour, M. T., J. L. Plafkin, B. P. Bradley, C. G. Graves & R. W. Wisseman, 1992. Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites. Envir. Toxicol. Chem. 11: 437–449.Google Scholar
  5. Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, G. E. Griffith, R. Frydenborg, E. Mc-Carron & J. W. White, 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebates. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 185–211.Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1999. Revision to Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic, Macroinvertebrates and Fish. 2nd Edn. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Water. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Bayne, B. L., K. R. Clarke & J. S. Gray, 1988. Background and rationale to a practical workshop on biological effects of pollutants. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 1–5.Google Scholar
  8. Boulton, A. J., 1999. An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 469–479.Google Scholar
  9. Cao, Y. & D. D. Williams, 1999. Rare species are important in bioassessment (Reply to the comments of Marchant). Limnol. Oceanog. 44: 1841–1842.Google Scholar
  10. Cao, Y., D. D. Williams & N. E. Williams, 1998. How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? Limnol. Oceanog. 43: 1403–1409.Google Scholar
  11. Cairns, J. & P. V. McCormick, 1992. Developing an ecosystembased capability for ecological risk assessments. Envir. Prof. 14: 186–196.Google Scholar
  12. Chessman, B. C., 1995. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family-level identification and a biotic index. Aust. J. Ecol. 20: 122–129.Google Scholar
  13. Chutter, F. M. & R. G. Noble, 1966. The reliability of a method of sampling stream invertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 62: 95–103.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, R. T., M. T. Furse, J. F. Wright & D. Moss, 1996. Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna. J. appl. Stat. 23: 311–332.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, S. E. K., 1976. Quest for an index of community structure sensitive to water pollution. Envir. Pollut. 11: 269–288.Google Scholar
  16. Courtemanch, D. L., 1994. Bridging the old and new science of biological monitoring. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 13: 117–121.Google Scholar
  17. Courtemanch, D. L., 1996. Commentary on the sub-sampling procedure used for rapid bioassessments. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 381–385.Google Scholar
  18. Coysh, J. L., S. J. Nichols, J. C., R. H. Norris, L. A. Barmuta, B. C. Chessman & P. Blackman, 2000. Web page for the AUStralian RIVer Assessment System (AUSRIVAS), http://ausrivas.canberra.edu.au/ausrivas Google Scholar
  19. Downing, J. A., 1979. Aggregation, transformation, and the design of benthos sampling programs. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 1454–1463.Google Scholar
  20. Eberhardt, L. L., 1963. Problems in ecological sampling. Northw. Sci. 37: 144–154.Google Scholar
  21. Eberhardt, L. L., 1976. Quantitative ecology and impact assessment. J. Envir. Mgmt 4: 213–217.Google Scholar
  22. Fairweather, P. G., 1999. State of environment indicators of 'river health': exploring the metaphor. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 211–220.Google Scholar
  23. Fairweather, P. & G. Napier, 1998. Environmental Indicators for National State of the Environment Reporting-Inland Waters, Australia: State of the Environment. Environmental Indicator Reports, Department of the Environment, Canberra.Google Scholar
  24. Faith, D. P. & R. H. Norris, 1989. Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates. Biol. Conserv. 50: 452–467.Google Scholar
  25. Fore, L. S., J. R. Karr & L. L. Conquest, 1994. Statistical properties of an index of biological integrity used to evaluate water resources. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 51: 1077–1087.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, D. G., 1977. Biological integrity of water-an historical approach. In Ballantine, R. K. & L. J. Guarraia (eds), The Integrity of Water. Proceedings of a Symposium, March 10-12, 1975. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: 127–140.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, J. R., M. T. Barbour, J. B. Stribling, J. Gerritsen & J. R. Karr, 1996. Biological Criteria-Technical Guidance for Streams and Rivers, Revised Edition. U.S. E.P.A., Office of Water, EPA 822-B-96-001, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Goodman, D., 1975. The theory of diversity-stability relationships in ecology. Quart. Rev. Biol. 50: 237–266.Google Scholar
  29. Green, R. H., 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Hawkins, C. P., R. H. Norris, J. N. Hogue & J. W. Feminella, 2000. Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity of streams. Ecol. Applic. 10, in press.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, B. H., A. T. Herlihy, P. R. Kaufmann, R. J. Stevenson, F. H. McCormick & C. B. Johnson, 2000. Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 50–57.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, R. M., 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton: 31–47.Google Scholar
  33. Hughes, R. M. & D. P. Larsen, 1988. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection. Res. J.Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 60: 486–493.Google Scholar
  34. Hughes, R. M., D. P. Larsen & J. M. Omernik, 1986. Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potential. Envir. Mgmt. 10: 629–635.Google Scholar
  35. Hurlbert, S. H., 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.Google Scholar
  36. Hurlbert, S. H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.Google Scholar
  37. Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.Google Scholar
  38. Karr, J. R., 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1: 66–84.Google Scholar
  39. Karr, J. R., 1999. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 221–234.Google Scholar
  40. Karr, J. R. & E. W. Chu, 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters. Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Washington, D.C.: 206 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Karr, J. R. & E. W. Chu, 2000. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia 422/423 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 149): 1–14.Google Scholar
  42. Karr, J. R. & D. R. Dudley, 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Envir. Mgmt. 5: 55–68.Google Scholar
  43. Kerans, B. L. & J. R. Karr, 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecol. Appl. 4: 768–785.Google Scholar
  44. Kerans, B. L., J. R. Karr & S. A. Ahlstedt, 1992. Aquatic invertebrate assemblages: spatial and temporal differences among sampling protocols. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 11: 377–390.Google Scholar
  45. Kondolf, G. M., 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Envir. Mgmt. 19: 1–15.Google Scholar
  46. Marchant, R., 1999. How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? A comment on the conclusions of Cao et al. Limnol. Oceanog. 44: 1840–1841.Google Scholar
  47. Marchant, R., A. Hirst, R. Norris & L. Metzeling, 1999. Classification of macroinvertebrate communities across drainage basins in 17 Victoria, Australia: consequences of sampling on a broad spatial scale for predictive modelling. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 253–268.Google Scholar
  48. Minchin, P. R., 1987. Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio 71: 145–156.Google Scholar
  49. Moss, D., M. T. Furse, J. F. Wright & P. D. Armitage, 1987. The prediction of the macro-invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 17: 41–52.Google Scholar
  50. Munn, R. E., 1988. The design of integrated monitoring systems to provide early indicators of environmental/ecological changes. Envir. Monit. Assess. 11: 203–217.Google Scholar
  51. Needham, P. R. & R. L. Usinger, 1956. Variability in the macrofauna of a single riffle in Prosser Creek, California, as indicated by the Surber sampler. Hilgardia 24: 383–409.Google Scholar
  52. Norris, R. H., 1995. Biological monitoring: the dilemma of data analysis. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 14: 440–450.Google Scholar
  53. Norris, R. H. & A. Georges, 1993. Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrate surveys. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York: 234–286.Google Scholar
  54. Norris, R. H. & M. C. Thoms, 1999. What is river health? Freshwat. Biol. 41: 1–13.Google Scholar
  55. Norris, R. H., P. McElravy & V. H. Resh, 1992. The sampling problem. In Calow, P. & G. E. Petts (eds), Rivers Handbook: Volume 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England: 282–306.Google Scholar
  56. Norris, R. H., B. T. Hart, M. Finlayson & K. R. Norris (guest eds), 1995. Use of Biota to Assess Water Quality. An International Conference. Aust. J. Ecol. 20: 227 pp.Google Scholar
  57. Noss, R. F., 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4: 355–364.Google Scholar
  58. Omernik, J. M., 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 77: 118–125.Google Scholar
  59. Omernik, J. M., 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida: 49–62.Google Scholar
  60. Parsons, M. P. & R. H. Norris, 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwat. Biol. 36: 419–434.Google Scholar
  61. Pelley, J., 2000. Restoring our rivers. Envir. Sci. Technol. February 1: 87A–90A.Google Scholar
  62. Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross & R. M. Hughes, 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. EPA/444/4-89/001, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: 160 pp.Google Scholar
  63. Rapport, D. J., 1991. Myths in the foundations of economics and ecology. Biol. J. linn. Soc. 44: 185–202.Google Scholar
  64. Rapport, D., 1995. Ecosystem health: exploring the territory. Ecosyst. Health 1: 5–13.Google Scholar
  65. Reynoldson, T. B., R. H. Norris, V. H. Resh, K. E. Day & D. M. Rosenberg, 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 833–852.Google Scholar
  66. Sheehan, P. J., 1984. Effects on community and ecosystem structure and dynamics. In Sheehan, P. J., D. R. Miller, G. C. Butler & P. Boudreau (eds), Effects of Pollution at the Ecosystem Level. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 51–99.Google Scholar
  67. Simpson, J. C. & R. H. Norris, 2000. Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwat. Biol. Ass. Ambleside, U.K.: 125–142.Google Scholar
  68. Southerland, M. T. & J. B. Stribling, 1995. Status of biological criteria development and implementation. In Davis, W. W. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida: 81–96.Google Scholar
  69. Stebbing, A. R. D. & V. Dethlefsen, 1992. Introduction to the Bremerhaven Workshop on the biological effects of contaminants. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 91: 1–8.Google Scholar
  70. Suter, G. W. II, 1993. A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes. Envir. Toxicol. Chem. 12: 1533–1539.Google Scholar
  71. Underwood, A. J., 1991. Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Aust. J. mar. freshwat. Res. 42: 569–587.Google Scholar
  72. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 370–377.Google Scholar
  73. Vinson, M. R. & C. P. Hawkins, 1996. Effects of sampling area and subsampling procedure on comparisons of taxa richness among streams. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 392–399.Google Scholar
  74. Washington, H. G., 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices. A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Wat. Res. 18: 653–694.Google Scholar
  75. Winget, R. N. & F. A. Magnum, 1979. Biotic Condition Index: Integrated Biological, Physical, and Chemical Stream Parameters for Management. U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Region, U.S. Dept of Agriculture. Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  76. Wright, J. F., 1995. Development and use of a system for predicting macroinvertebrates in flowing waters. Aust. J. Ecol. 20: 181–197.Google Scholar
  77. Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard H. Norris
    • 1
  • Charles P. Hawkins
    • 2
  1. 1.Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater EcologyUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Watershed Science Unit, and Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations