Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 179–196 | Cite as

What difference does it make? Children's views of the differences between some quadrilaterals

  • Frank Monaghan
Article

Abstract

This paper describes an attempt to explore aspects of the language used in children's written work in a secondary mathematics classroom as a means of assessing their mathematical understanding. It focuses on children's conceptualisations of polygons and their attempts to differentiate between them. It also examines the use of database and concordancing software in deepening our understanding of a potentially major source of students' (mis) conceptions: the published materials they engage with. It describes their usefulness in providing a systematic and efficient method of analysis of materials to explore patterns within them. The method is also used to identify possible sources of students' misconceptions about the properties of polygons based on their likely exposure to potentially misleading examples in published materials.

language mathematics secondary quadrilaterals van Hiele 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adler, J.: 1999, 'The dilemma of transparency: Seeing and seeing through talk in the mathematics classroom', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(1), 47-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, J.: 1997, 'A participatory-inquiry approach and the mediation of mathematical knowledge in a multilingual classroom', Educational Studies in Mathematics 33, 235-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crowley, M.: 1987, 'The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought', in M.M. Lindquist and A.P. Shulte (eds), Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1987 Yearbook, Virginia, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar
  4. DES: 1989, Mathematics in the National Curriculum, DES, London.Google Scholar
  5. De Villiers: 1994, 'The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals', For the Learning of Mathematics 14(1) (Feb. 1994), 11-18.Google Scholar
  6. DFE: 1995, The National Curriculum, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  7. Ernest, P. (ed.): 1994, Mathematics, Education and Philosophy. An International Perspective, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Fischbein, E.: 1993, 'The theory of figural concept', Educational Studies in Mathematics 24, 139-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geddes, D., Fuys, D., Lovett, J. and Tischler, R.: 1982, 'An investigation of the van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents', Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March 1982, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Gipps, C.: 1994, Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Hanley, A.: 1978, 'Verbal Mathematics', Mathematics in School 7(4), 27-30.Google Scholar
  12. Hasegawa, J.: 1997, 'Concept formation of triangles and quadrilaterals in the second grade', Educational Studies in Mathematics 32, 157-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hershkovitz, R.: 1990, 'Psychological aspects of learning geometry', in P. Nesher and J. Kilpatrick (eds), Mathematics and Cognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Hoey, M.: 1991, Patterns of Lexis in Text, OUP, London.Google Scholar
  15. Kerslake, D.A.: 1979, 'Visual mathematics', Mathematics in School 8(2), 34-35.Google Scholar
  16. Kress, G.: 1994, Learning to Write (2nd edition), Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  17. Laborde, C.: 1994, 'Enseigner la géometrie: permanences et révolutions', Proceedings of ICME 7 Quebec, 1, 47-75.Google Scholar
  18. Mercer, N.: 1995, The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk among Teachers and Learners, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.Google Scholar
  19. Monaghan, F.: 1997, Language and Mathematics: The Analysis of Written Text in the Secondary Classroom, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, C.: 1998, Writing Mathematically: The Discourse of Investigation, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  21. Parzysz, B.: 1991, 'Representation of space and students' conceptions at high school level', Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 575-593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parzysz, B.: 1988, 'Knowing vs. seeing. Problems of the plane representation of space geometry figures', Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(1): 79-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pimm, D.: 1987, Speaking Mathematically, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  24. Sfard, A.: 1991, 'On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin', Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shaughnessy, J.M. and Burger, W.F.: 1985, 'Spadework prior to deduction in geometry', Mathematics Teacher 78(6), 419-427.Google Scholar
  26. Sierpinska, A.: 1994, Understanding Mathematics, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  27. Sinclair, J.: 1991, Corpus, Concordance, and Collocation, C.U.P., Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Stubbs, M.: 1996, Text and Corpus Analysis, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Triadafillidis, T.A.: 1995, 'Visual limitations in geometry', Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 225-233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Hiele, P.M.: 1984, 'A child's thought and geometry', in D. Geddes, D. Fuys and R. Tischler (eds), English Translation of Selected Writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. Van Hiele, part of the research project, 'An investigation of the van Hiele Model of Thinking in Geometry among Adolescents', Research in Science Education (RISE) Program of the National Science Foundation, Grant No. SED 7920640.Google Scholar
  31. van Hiele-Geldof, D.: De Didaktiak van de Meetkunde in de eerste Klas van het V.H.M.O., Utrecht, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  32. von Glaserfeld, E.: 1995, Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar
  33. Vygotsky, L.: 1986, Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L.: 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Monaghan
    • 1
  1. 1.LondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations