Euphytica

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 167–173 | Cite as

Induced mutations – A new paradigm in plant breeding

  • B.S. Ahloowalia
  • M. Maluszynski
Article

Abstract

The use of ionizing radiation, such as X-rays, gamma rays and neutrons and chemical mutagens for inducing variation, is well established. Induced mutations have been used to improve major crops such as wheat, rice, barley,cotton, peanuts, and beans, which are seed propagated. Since the establishment of the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of the Nuclear Techniques in Agriculture, more than 1800 cultivars obtained either as direct mutants or derived from their crosses have been released worldwide in 50 countries. In vegetatively propagated plants, many of mutants were derived from irradiating rooted stem cuttings, detached leaves, and dormant plants. According to the FAO/IAEA database, of the 465 mutants released among the vegetatively propagated plants, most are in the floricultural plants and a few in fruit trees. These include chrysanthemum, Alstroemeria, dahlia, bougainvillea, rose, Achimenes,begonia, carnation, Streptocarpus, and azalea. The irradiation of in vitro cultured date palm, apple, potato, sweet potato and pineapple now provides a means to treat large populations which would not have been possible before. Irradiation of micropropagated plants, axillary and adventitious buds, apical meristems, regenerative callus cultures, anthers and microspores, and somatic embryos provides a miniaturized version of trees and seeds in the Petridish instead of the field. During the last decade, the use of radio-actively labeled probes in recombinant DNA research for cloning and mapping plant genes and transgenesis, particularly for RFLP, micro satellite based DNA fingerprinting, has become a routine procedure. Many homeotic mutants that change floral development have been isolated in Arabidopsis, Petunia, Antirrhinum and Lycopersicon. Mutants of Arabidopsis are being used to analyze genes, which determine response to auxins, cytokinins, gibberellin, abscisic acid and ethylene in plant growth, floral development and senescence, fruit formation and ripening. These mutants are facilitating the isolation, identification and cloning of the genes, which would ultimately help in designing crops with improved yield, increased stress tolerance, longer shelf-life and reduced agronomic inputs. The identification and analysis of mutants by using molecular techniques of DNA fingerprinting and mapping with PCR based markers, such as RAPDs, AFLP and STMS, and mutant tagging shall bring a new dimension in gene technology. Already, mutations can be linked to changes in DNA sequences for some plant traits and to establish molecular maps in structural and functional genomics of crop plants. These in turn would lead to a rapid enhancement of crop yields and quality.

induced mutations in vitro culture molecular markers developmental mutants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, 1995. Bureau of Economic and Agricultural Statistics, Bangkok, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Aukerman, M.J. & R.M. Amasino, 1998. Floral induction and florigen. Cell 93: 491–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beetham, P.R., P.B. Kipp, X.L. Sawycky, C.J. Arntzen & G.D. May, 1999. A tool for functional plant genomics: chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides cause in vivo gene-specific mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 9774–8778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya, M.K., A.M. Smith, T.H.N. Ellis, C. Hedley & C. Martin, 1990. The wrinkled-seed character of peas described Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene encoding starch branching enzyme. Cell 60: 115–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blixt, 1972. Mutation genetics in Pisum. Agri Hortique Genetica 30: 1–293.Google Scholar
  6. Broertjes, C., 1977. Mutagen treatment and handling of treated material. In: Manual on Mutation Breeding. Second Edition, International Atomic Energy Agency, Tech Rep Ser No 119. Vienna, pp. 160–168.Google Scholar
  7. Brunner, H. & H. Keppl, 1991. Radiation induced apple mutants of improved commercial value. In: Proc Plant Mutation Breed for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. Internl Symp, IAEA and Food Agric Org of the UN, IAEA SM-311, Vienna, pp. 547–552.Google Scholar
  8. Chakrabarti, S.N., 1995. Mutation breeding in India with particular reference to PNR rice varieties. J Nuclear Agric Biol 24: 73–82. Chaudhury, A.M., L. Ming, C. Miller, S. Craig, E.S. Dennis & W.J. Peacock, 1997. Fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4223–4228. Creech, R., 1965. Genetic control of carbohydrate synthesis in maize. Genetics 52: 1175–1186. Dribnenki, J.C.P., A.G. Green & G.N. Atlin, 1996. LinolaTM 989 low linolenic flax. Can J Plant Sci 76: 329–331. Fox, M.S., 1998. Some recollections and reflections on mutation rates. Genetics 148: 1415–1418.Google Scholar
  9. Giroux, M.J. & C.F. Morris, 1998. Wheat grain hardness results from highly conserved mutations in the friabilin components puroindoline a and b. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 6262–6266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, A.G., 1986. A mutant genotype of flax (Linum usitatissimum) containing very low levels of linolenic acid in its seed oil. Can J Plant Sci 66: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hannah, C., M. Giroux & C. Boyer, 1993. Biotechnological modi-fication of carbohydrates for sweet corn and maize improvement. Scientia Horticulturae 55: 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hensz, R.A., 1991. Mutation breeding of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.). In: Proc Plant Mutation Breed for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. Internl Symp IAEA and Food Agric Org of the UN, IAEA SM-311, Vienna, pp. 533–536.Google Scholar
  13. IAEA, 1997. Report 2nd FAO/IAEA Research Coordination Meeting on in vitro techniques for selection of radiation induced mutants adapted to adverse environmental conditions. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
  14. Lapade, A.G., A.M.S. Veluz & I.S. Santos, 1995. Genetic improvement of the Queen variety of pineapple through induced mutation and in vitro culture techniques. In: Proc Induced Mutations and Molec Techn for Crop Improvement. Internl Symp IAEA and Food Agric Org of the UN, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 684–687.Google Scholar
  15. Love, S.L., T.P. Baker, A. Thompson-Johns & B.K. Werner, 1996. Induced mutations for reduced tuber glycoalkaloid content in potatoes. Plant Breed 115: 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leyser, O., 1997. Auxins: Lessons from a mutant weed. Physiol Plant 100: 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacLeod, M.R., 1994. Analysis of an allelic series of mutants at the r locus of pea. PhD Thesis, Univ East Anglia, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Mak, C., Y.W. Ho, Y.P. Tan & R. Ibrahim, 1996. Novaria - A new banana mutant induced by gamma irradiation. Informusa 5: 35–36.Google Scholar
  19. Maluszynski, M., B. Sigurbjörnsson, E. Amano, L. Sitch & O. Kamra, 1992. Mutant varieties-data bank, FAO, IAEA database. Part II. Mutation Breed Newsl 39: 14–17.Google Scholar
  20. Maluszynski, M., B.S. Ahloowalia & B. Sigurbjörnsson, 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meinke, D.W., 1992. A homeotic mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana with leafy cotyledons. Science 258: 1647–1649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miklashevichs, E. & R. Waldon, 1997. Plant mutants with altered response to cytokinins. Physiol Plant 100: 528–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendel, G., 1865. Versuche über Pflanzen-hybriden. Verhandlungen des Naturforsehenden Vereins in Brünn 4: 3–47.Google Scholar
  24. Merlot, S. & J. Giraudat, 1997. Genetic analysis of abscisic acid signal transduction. Plant Physiol 114: 751–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maruyama, K., H. Araki & H. Kato, 1991. Thermosensitive genic male sterility induced by irradiation. In: Rice Genetics II. IRRI, Manila, Philippines, pp. 227–235.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, O. & D. Pan, 1995. Starch synthesis in maize endosperms. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Molec Biol 46: 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pnueli, L., D. Harven, S.D. Rounsley, M.F. Yanofsky & E. Lifschitz, 1994. Isolation of the tomato Agamous gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6: 163–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ross, J.J., I.C. Murfet & J.B. Reid, 1997. Gibberellin mutants. Physiol Plant 100: 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanada, T., K. Kotobuki, T. Nishida, H. Fujita & F. Ikeda, 1993. A new Japanese cultivar ‘Golden Nijisseike’, resistant mutant to black spot disease of Japanese pear. Japan J Breed 43: 455–461.Google Scholar
  30. Schmülling, T., S. Schäfer & G. Romanov, 1997. Cytokinins as regulators of gene expression. Physiol Plant 100: 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen, Y.W., Q.H. Kai & M.W. Gao, 1993. A new thermosensitive radiation induced male-sterile rice line. Rice Genet Newsl 10: 97–98.Google Scholar
  32. Swaminathan, M.S., 1998. Crop production and sustainable food security. In: V.L. Chopra, R.B. Singh & A. Varma (Eds.), Crop Productivity and Sustainability - Shaping the Future. Proc 2nd Internl Crop Science Cong Oxford and IBH Publishing Co Pvt Ltd New Delhi, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  33. Szarejko, I., J. Guzy, J. Jimenez Davalos, A. Roland Chaves & M. Maluszynski, 1995. Production of mutants using barley DH systems. In: Proc Induced Mutations and Molec Techn for Crop Improvement. Internl Symp IAEA and Food Agric Org of the UN, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 517–530.Google Scholar
  34. Yabuta, T. & Y. Sumiki, 1938. On the crystal of gibberellin, a substance to promote plant growth. J Agr Chem Soc Jpn 14: 1526.Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson, J.Q., M.B. Lanahan, D.G. Clarck, A. Bleecker, C. Chang, E.M. Meyerowitz & H.J. Klee, 1997. A dominant mutant receptor from Arabidopsis confers ethylene insensitivity in heterologous plants. Nature Biotech 15: 444–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu, T.D., D.J. Peterson, L. Tagliani, G. St. Clair, C.L. Baszczynski & B. Bowen, 1999. Targeted manipulation of maize genes in vivo using chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 8768–8773.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • B.S. Ahloowalia
    • 1
  • M. Maluszynski
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureInternational Atomic Energy AgencyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations