Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 299–325 | Cite as

Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning

  • Katherine SamuelowiczEmail author
  • John D. Bain
Article

Abstract

In the last decade, several classifications of the ways in whichacademics conceptualise teaching and learning have been proposed,including our scheme (Samuelowicz and Bain 1992). This paper reassessesthe framework described in our earlier paper, evaluates the adequacy ofthe belief dimensions and categories in that framework and considerswhether there is a `transitional' orientation to teaching and learningas argued by Kember (1997a) in his recent synthesis of the domain.Thirty-nine academics representing a range of disciplines wereinterviewed and in accordance with a `beliefs' framework we sought theirtypical ways of thinking about teaching and learning, and theirdispositions to teach in particular ways. The constant comparison method(Strauss and Corbin 1997) was applied to whole interview transcripts toidentify broad orientations to teaching and learning, which were thenanalysed to identify the qualitatively distinct beliefs constitutingthem. An extended framework of academics' beliefs about teaching andlearning is proposed in which seven orientations are described in termsof nine qualitative belief dimensions. There is considerable overlapwith our previous findings, but there also are some importantrefinements and additions. Three forms of evidence (the qualitativeanalysis itself, a hierarchical clustering based on that analysis, andnarratives of two academics) are presented to demonstrate that there arefundamental differences between teaching-centred and learning-centredorientations to teaching and learning. Thus our data are broadlyconsistent with previously reported evidence, but they provide noempirical support for Kember's (1997a) `transitional' category acting asa bridge between the two major sets of orientations.

academics' beliefs academic staff development beliefs conceptions conceptions of teaching educational beliefs orientations to teaching and learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Bain, J.D. (1994). Understanding by Learning or Learning by Understanding: How Shall We Teach? Inaugural Professorial Lecture, Griffith University, September 28, 1994, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  3. Bain, J.D. (2000). ‘Celebrating good teaching in higher education: Putting beliefs into practice’, in Bowie, C. (ed.), Improving the Quality of Tteaching for Learning. Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the Queensland Branch of HERDSA, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  4. Bain, J. and McNaught, C. (1996). ‘Academics' educational conceptions and the design and impact of computer software in higher education’, in McBeath, C. and Atkinson, R. (eds.), The Learning Superhighway. New World? New Worries? Proceedings of the Third International Interactive Multimedia Symposium. Perth: Promaco Conventions, pp. 56–59Google Scholar
  5. Bain, J.D., McNaught, C., Mills, C. and Lueckenhausen, G. (1998). ‘Describing computer facilitated learning environments in higher education’, Learning Environments Research 1, 163–180.Google Scholar
  6. Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). ‘Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice’, Journal of Teacher Education 41, 53–62.Google Scholar
  7. Dall'Alba, G. (1991). ‘Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching’, in Ross, B. (ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education, Vol. 13. Sydney: HERDSA, pp. 293–297.Google Scholar
  8. Dunkin, M.J. (1990). ‘The induction of academic staff to a university: processes and products’, Higher Education 20, 47–66.Google Scholar
  9. Fox, D. (1983). ‘Personal theories of teaching’, Studies in Higher Education 8, 151–163.Google Scholar
  10. Fransella, F. and Bannister, D. (1977). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1993). ‘Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 20–33.Google Scholar
  12. Kember, D. (1997a). ‘A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching’, Learning and Instruction 7, 225–275.Google Scholar
  13. Kember, D. (1997b). ‘Teaching beliefs and their impact on students' approaches to learning’, in Dart, B. and Boukton-Lewis, G. (eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Camberwell, Vic.: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kember, D. and Gow. L. (1994). ‘Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning’, Journal of Higher Education 65, 58–74.Google Scholar
  15. Kember, D. and Kwan, K.P. (in press). ‘Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching’, in Hativa, N. and Goodyear, P. (eds.), Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, E. and Balla, M. (1991). ‘Conceptions of teaching and implications for learning’, in Ross. B. (ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education, Vol. 13. Sydney: HERDSA, pp. 298–304.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, E. and Ramsden, P. (1992).’ An expanding awareness: how lecturers change their understanding of teaching’, in Parer, M.S. (ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education, Vol. 15. Sydney: HERDSA, pp. 148–155.Google Scholar
  18. Pratt, D.D. (1992). ‘Conceptions of teaching’, Adult Education Quarterly 42, 203–220.Google Scholar
  19. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. and Taylor, P. (1994). ‘A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching’, Learning and Instruction 4, 217–232.Google Scholar
  20. Quinlan, K.M. (1997). ‘Case studies of academics' educational beliefs about their discipline: toward a discourse on scholarly dimensions of teaching'. Paper Presented to the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia 8, 11 July, 1997, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  21. Quinlan, K.M. (1999). ‘Commonalities and controversy in context: a study of academic historians' educational beliefs’, Teaching and Teacher Education 15, 447–463.Google Scholar
  22. Richardson, J.T.E. (1999). ‘The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research’, Review of Educational Research 69, 53–82.Google Scholar
  23. Roschelle, J. (1992). ‘Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change’, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2, 235–276.Google Scholar
  24. Samuelowicz, K. (1999). Academics’ Educational Beliefs and Teaching Practices. Unpublished PhD thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  25. Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J.D. (1992). ‘Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers’, Higher Education 24, 93–111.Google Scholar
  26. Sheppard, C. and Gilbert, J. (1991). ‘Course design, teaching method and student epistemology’, Higher Education 22, 229–249Google Scholar
  27. Smith, M.L. and Shepard, L.A. (1988). ‘Kindergarten readiness and retention: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices’, American Educational Research Journal 25, 307–333.Google Scholar
  28. Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J.M. (1997). Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Strike, K.A. and Posner, G.J. (1985). ‘A conceptual change view of learning and understanding’, in West, L.H.T. and Pines, A.L. (eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, A.G. (1984). ‘The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 105–127.Google Scholar
  31. Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1996). ‘Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers' approaches to teaching’, Higher Education 27, 1–11.Google Scholar
  32. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Taylor, P. (1994). ‘Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science’, Higher Education 27, 75–84.Google Scholar
  33. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Waterhouse, F. (1999). ‘Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches learning’, Higher Education 37, 57–70.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, S.M. and Wineburg, S.S. (1988). ‘Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspective in teaching history’, Teachers College Record 89, 525–539.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of QueenslandAustralia (author for correspondence; E-mail:
  2. 2.Griffith UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations