, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 43–52 | Cite as

Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivars and landraces under near optimal and drought conditions

  • S. Denčić
  • R. Kastori
  • B. Kobiljski
  • B. Duggan


In a 2-years experiment, 30 wheat cultivars and 21 landraces from different countries were tested under near optimum and drought stress conditions. Plant height, number of sterile spikelets per spike, spikelets per spike, number of kernels per spike, kernel weight per spike, 1000 kernel weight and grain yield were evaluated. The number of kernels per spike, 1000 kernel weight and especially yield were more sensitive to drought stress in the cultivars than plant height and number of spikelets per spike, while in the landraces these traits did not differ under drought stress compared to near optimum conditions. The average yield of cultivars was significantly better than the average yield of landraces under near optimum as well as drought stress conditions. Path coefficient analysis showed that for cultivars under near optimum conditions there was no significant direct association of any of the analysed characters with yield, while under drought stress conditions, number of kernels per spike had a significant positive direct effect. Under drought stress conditions, the number of sterile spikelets displayed a negative direct effect, while kernel weight per spike had a positive direct effect on yield. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used as a tool to classify cultivars and landraces according to their yield ability under near optimum and drought stress conditions. Among the cultivars, two groups out of five and among one of three in the landraces were characterised by high yields in both near optimum as well as under drought stress conditions. These genotypes may serve as sources of germplasm for breeding for drought tolerance.

cultivars drought stress droughtsusceptibility index landraces wheat yield 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acevedo, E., 1990. Effect of heat stress on wheat and possible selection tools for use in breeding for tolerance. Proc. Inter. Conf. 'Wheat for Nontraditional Warm Areas' Foz do Iguacu, Brazil, Tehnic. D.A. Saunders, (Ed.) pp. 401–422.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Khatib, K. & G.M. Paulsen, 1984. Mode of high temperature to wheat during grain development. Physiol Plant 61: 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blum, A., 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 38–78Google Scholar
  4. Blum, A., 1989. Breeding methods for drought resistance. Plants under stress. Meeting Soc. Exp. Biol., Lancaster, UK, 28–31 Mar., 1988., H.G. Jones et al. (Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK., pp. 197–216Google Scholar
  5. Blum, A., 1993. Selection for sustained production in water-deficit environments. In: nter. Crop Sci. Soc. of America, Madison, WI, USA, Chapter 44, pp. 343–347.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, A., 1996. Yield potential and drought resistance: are they mutually exclusive? In: M.P. Reynolds, S. Rajaram & A. McNab (Eds.), Increasing Yield Potential in Wheat. Breaking the Barriers, pp. 90–101.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, H.J., S. Rajaram & M. Van Ginkel, 1996. CIMMYT's approach to breeding for wide adaptation. Euphytica 92: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruckner, P.L. & R.C. Frohberg, 1987. Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat. Crop Sci 27: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceccarelli, S., E. Acevedo, & S. Grando, 1991. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments-single traits, interaction between traits and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer, R.A. & R. Maurer, 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 29: 897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, R.A., 1993. Cereal breeding in developing countries: Progress and prospects. In: Inter Crop Sci Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, Chapter 27, 201–209.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia del Moral, L.F., J.M. Ramos, M.B. Garcia del Moral & M.P. Jimenez-Tejada, 1991. Ontogenetic approach to grain production in spring barley based on path-coefficient analysis. Crop Sci 31: 1179–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO-IPGRI 1996. Country reports of the FAO international technical conference on plant genetic resources: pp. 6.Google Scholar
  14. Li, C.C. 1956. The concept of path coefficient and its impact on population genetics. Biometrics 12: 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ludlow, M.M. & R.C. Muchow, 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yield in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43: 107–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rajaram, S., H.J. Braun & M. Van Ginkel, 1996. CIMMYT's approach to breed for drought tolerance. Euphytica 92: 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shpiler, L. & A. Blum, 1986. Differential relations of wheat cultivars to hot environments. Euphytica 35: 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shpiler, L. & A. Blum, 1991. Heat tolerance to yield and its components in different wheat cultivars. Euphytica 51: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simane, B., P.C. Struik, M.M. Nachit & J.M. Peacock, 1993. Ontogenetic analysis of yield components and yield stability of durum wheat in water-limited environments. Euphytica 71: 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sofield, I., L.T. Evans & I.F. Wordlaw, 1974. The effects of temperature and light on grain filling in wheat. R Soc NZ, Bull 12: 909–915.Google Scholar
  21. Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie & D.A. Dickey, 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a biometrical approach. (3rd Edition), The McGraw-Hill Co., Inc., New York, USA, pp. 56–58.Google Scholar
  22. Stone, P.J. & M.E. Nicolas, 1994. Wheat cultivars vary widely in responses of grain yield and quality to short periods of post-anthesis heat stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 21: 887–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone, P.J. & M.E. Nicolas, 1995. A survey of the effects of high temperature during grain filing on yield and quality of 75 wheat cultivars. Aust J Agric Res 46: 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhong-hu, H. & S. Rajaram, 1994. Differential responses of bread wheat characters to high temperature. Euphytica 72: 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Denčić
    • 1
  • R. Kastori
    • 2
  • B. Kobiljski
    • 1
  • B. Duggan
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Field and Vegetable CropsNovi SadYugoslavia
  2. 2.Faculty of agricultureUniversity of Novi Sad and Institute of Field and Vegetable CropsNovi SadYugoslavia
  3. 3.CSIRO Division of Plant IndustryInstute of Plant Production and ProcessingCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations