Advertisement

Instructional Science

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 309–329 | Cite as

Portraits of PBL: Course objectives and students' study strategies in computer engineering, psychology and physiotherapy

  • Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren
Article

Abstract

The central theme of the investigation concerns therole of course objectives in relation to students'study strategies in problem-based learning (PBL). Theresults comprise data from three different PBLprogrammes at Linköpings Universitet; a Bachelor'sprogramme in physiotherapy, a Master's programme inpsychology, and a Master's programme in ComputerEngineering, respectively. In all three programmes,the faculty provides course objectives with theintention that these should function as a supportivestructure and guide for the students' independentstudies. The results show that the objectives wereused differently in the different programmes; as anintegrated tool in the learning process, as anadministrative schedule or as aretroactive checklist, respectively. Thestudents' use of the course objectives in the learningprocess varied according to how the objectives wereformulated and conceived. The relationship between theformat of objectives provided by the faculty and howstudents deal with them in the learning process couldalso denote fragments of the different educationalcultures within the three programmes and how themeaning of problem-based learning is interpreted.

problem-based learning comparative study students' perspective course objectives learning process qualitative analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine 68: 52–81.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 21: 93–108.Google Scholar
  3. Barrows, H.S. & Tamblyn, R.M. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Barrows, H.S. (1985). How to Design a Problem-Based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Barrows, H.S. (1988). The Tutorial Process. Springfield, Illinois: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  6. Boud, D. & Feletti, G., eds (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1977). A Guide to Teaching Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dahlgren, L.O. (1989). Undervisningen och det meningsfulla lärandet [Teaching and meaningful learning]. In R. Säljö, ed., Som vi uppfattar det. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  9. Dolmans, D.H.J.M. & Schmidt, H.G. (1994). What drives the students in problem-based learning? Academic Medicine 28: 372–380.Google Scholar
  10. Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, H.A.P. & Schmidt, H.G. (1996). Effects of tutor expertise on student performance in relation to prior knowledge and level of curricular structure. Academic Medicine 71: 1008–1011.Google Scholar
  11. Eisner, E. (1979). The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Handal, G., Lauvå s, P. & Lycke, K. (1990). The concept of rationality in academic science teaching. European Journal of Education 25: 319–322.Google Scholar
  13. Holstein, J.A. & Gubrium, J.F. (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology and interpretive practice. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, eds, Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 262–273. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Huberman, A.M. & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, eds, Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 428–445. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York/Cambridge: The Adult Education Company.Google Scholar
  16. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lawler, J. (1998). Adapting a phenomenological philosophy to research and writing. In J. Higgs, ed., Writing Qualitative Research, pp. 47–55. Sydney: Hampden Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mager, R. (1962). Preparing Instructional Objectives, revised 2nd edn. Belmont, CA: David Lake Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Margetson, D. (1997). Wholeness and educative learning: The question of problems in changing to problem-based learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Problem-Based Learning, Brunel University, Uxbridge, West London, U.K., 10- 13 September.Google Scholar
  20. Margetson, D. (1998). What counts as problem based learning? Education for Health 11:193–201.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald-Ross, M. (1973). Behavioral objectives - a critical review. Instructional Science 2:1–52.Google Scholar
  22. McKeachie, W.J., ed. (1999). Teaching Tips. Strategies, Research and Theory for College and University Teachers, 10th edn. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  23. Nicol, D.J. (1997). Research on Learning and Higher Education teaching. UCoSDA Briefing Paper 45, April.Google Scholar
  24. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. London: Routhledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Ryan, G. (1993). Student perceptions about self-directed learning in a professional course implementing problem-based learning. Studies in Higher Education 18: 53–63.Google Scholar
  26. Schraw, G.(1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26: 113–125.Google Scholar
  27. Säljö, R. (1994). Minding action. Conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices. Nordisk pedagogik 2: 71–80.Google Scholar
  28. Tyler, R. (1949). Basic Principles or Curriculum Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist 25: 3–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Health SciencesLinköpings UniversitetLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations