Euphytica

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 91–98

Expression and inheritance of tolerance to waterlogging stress in wheat

  • G. Boru
  • M. van Ginkel
  • W. E. Kronstad
  • L. Boersma
Article

Abstract

Approximately 10 million hectares of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) globally experience medium toserious waterlogging. The inheritance of waterloggingtolerance was determined in reciprocal crosses ofthree tolerant (Prl/Sara, Ducula and Vee/Myna), andtwo sensitive (Seri-82 and Kite/Glen) spring breadwheat lines. Parents, F1, F2, F3, and backcrossgenerations were studied under field conditions in Cd.Obregon, State of Sonora, Mexico. Flooding was appliedwhen plants were at the three-leaf and first-internodestages. Basins were drained after 40 days of flooding.Leaf chlorosis was used as a measure of waterloggingtolerance. The sensitive by sensitive cross, Seri-82 × Kite/Glen, showed the highest mean values forpercentage leaf chlorosis and area under chlorosisprogress curve (AUCPC), and the lowest mean values forplant height, biomass, grain yield, and kernel weight.The F3 of the cross between the two tolerant parentsDucula and Vee/Myna had the lowest mean values forpercentage leaf chlorosis and AUCPC, and the highestmean values for plant height, biomass, and grainyield. The expression of waterlogging tolerance wasnot influenced by a maternal effect. The F1 hybridswere intermediate for leaf chlorosis, indicating thattolerance was additive. Quantitative analysis alsoindicated that additive gene effects mainly controlledwaterlogging tolerance in these crosses. Segregationratios of F3 lines indicated that up to four genescontrolled waterlogging tolerance in these crosses,with two genes adequate to provide significanttolerance. Early-generation selection for tolerancewould be effective in these populations.

bread wheat flooding genes leaf chlorosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bjarko, M.E. & R.F. Line, 1988. Quantitative determination of the gene action of leaf rust resistance in four cultivars of wheat, Triticum aestivum. Genetics 78: 451–456.Google Scholar
  2. Cai, S., 1990. Differential response to waterlogging in wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.). M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, C.L. & L.V. Madden, 1990. Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Cannell, R.Q., R.K. Belford, K. Gales, C.W. Dennis & R.D. Prew, 1980. Effect of waterlogging at different stages of development on the growth and yield of winter wheat. J Sci Food Agric 31: 117–132.Google Scholar
  5. Cavalli, L.L., 1952. An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In: E.C.R. Rive & C.H. Waddington (Eds.), Quantitative inheritance, pp. 135–144. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, M.S. & G.C. Hillman, 1988. Effect of soil flooding on growth and grain yield of tetraploid and hexaploid species of wheat. Cereal Res Commun 12: 135–141.Google Scholar
  7. Gill, K.S., A. Qadar & K.N. Singh, 1993. Effect of interaction of flooding and alkalinity at various growth stages on grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J Agric Sci 63: 793–802.Google Scholar
  8. Huang, B., J.W. Johnson, D. Scott NeSmith & D.C. Bridges, 1994a. Growth, physiology, and anatomical response of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply. J Exp Bot 54: 193–202.Google Scholar
  9. Huang, B., J.W. Johnson, D. Scott NeSmith & D.C. Bridges, 1994b. Root and shoot growth of wheat genotypes in response to hypoxia and subsequent resumption of aeration. Crop Sci 34: 1538–1544.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, M.B. & M.C. Drew, 1984. Effect of flooding on growth and metabolism of herbaceous plants. In: T.T. Kozlowski (Ed.), Flooding and Plant Growth, pp. 47–128. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Kozlowski, T.T., 1984. Extent, causes, and impact of flooding. In: T.T. Kozlowski (Ed.), Flooding and Plant Growth, pp. 1–5. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Mather, S.K. & J.L. Jinks, 1982. Biometrical Genetics. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, New York.Google Scholar
  13. McKerise, B.D. & L.A. Hunt, 1987. Genotypic differences in tolerance of ice encasement, low temperature flooding, and freezing in winter wheat. Crop Sci 27: 860–863.Google Scholar
  14. McLean, R.A., W.L. Sanders & W.W. Stroup, 1991. A unified approach to mixed linear models. The American Statistician 45: 54–64.Google Scholar
  15. Musgrave, M.E., 1994. Waterlogging effect on yield and photosynthesis in eight winter wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 34: 1314–1318.Google Scholar
  16. Ponnamperuma, F.N., 1984. Effect of flooding in soils. In: T.T. Kozlowski (Ed.), Flooding and Plant Growth, pp. 9–45. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  17. SAS Institute, 1989. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  18. Sayre, K.D., M. van Ginkel, S. Rajaram & I. Ortiz-Monasterio, 1994. Tolerance to water-logging losses in spring bread wheat: Effect of time of onset on expression. Annual Wheat Newsl 40: 165–171. Colorado State University, Colorado.Google Scholar
  19. Setter, T. & B. Belford, 1990. Waterlogging: how it reduces plant growth and how plants can overcome its effects. W A J Agric 31: 51–57.Google Scholar
  20. Sharma, D.P. & A. Swarup, 1988. Effect of short term waterlogging on growth, yield and mineral composition of wheat in sodic soil under field conditions. Plant Soil 107: 137–143.Google Scholar
  21. Singh, R.K. & B.D. Chaudhary, 1977. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publ., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  22. Thomson, C.J., T.D. Colmer, E.L.J. Watkin & H. Greenway, 1992. Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to waterlogging. New Phytol 120: 335–344.Google Scholar
  23. Trought, M.C.T. & M.C. Drew, 1980a. The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum). Plant Soil 54: 77–94.Google Scholar
  24. Trought, M.C.T. & M.C. Drew, 1980b. The development of waterlogging damage in young wheat plants in anaerobic solution cultures. J Exp Bot 31: 1573–1585.Google Scholar
  25. van Ginkel, M., S. Rajaram & M. Thijssen, 1992. Waterlogging in wheat: Germplasm evaluation and methodology development. In: D.G. Tanner & W. Mwangi (Eds.), The Seventh Regional Wheat Workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa, pp. 115–124. Nakuru, Kenya: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  26. Xiang, H.W., Y.S. Zhe & S.C. Liang, 1994. Flood-resistant wheat germplasm resources in Hubei province. Wheat, Barley and Triticale Abst. 11: 5332.Google Scholar
  27. Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang & C.F. Konzak, 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14: 415–421.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Boru
    • 1
  • M. van Ginkel
    • 2
  • W. E. Kronstad
    • 1
  • L. Boersma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallis
  2. 2.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)Mexico, D.F.Mexico

Personalised recommendations