, Volume 410, Issue 0, pp 223–240 | Cite as

Linking land use, erosion and sediment yields in river basins

  • D. E. Walling


Results obtained from erosion plots and catchment experiments provide clear evidence of the sensitivity of erosion rates to land use change and related human activity. Evidence for the impact of land use on the sediment yields of world rivers is less clear, although examples of rivers where sediment yields have both increased and decreased in recent decades can be identified. The apparent lack of sensitivity of river sediment loads to land use change reflects, at least in part, the buffering capacity associated with many river basins. This buffering capacity is closely related to the sediment delivery ratio of a river basin, in that basins with high sediment delivery ratios are likely to exhibit a reduced buffering capacity. Investigations of the impact of land use and related human activity on sediment yields should consider the overall sediment budget of a catchment rather than simply the sediment output. Information on the sediment budget of a drainage basin is difficult to assemble using traditional techniques, but recent developments in the application of fingerprinting techniques to establish sediment sources and in the use of environmental radionuclides, such as caesium-137 and lead-210, to document sediment storage offer considerable potential for providing such information. Sediment storage within a river basin can give rise to environmental problems where sediment-associated pollutants accumulate in sediment sinks. The accumulation of phosphorus on river floodplains as a result of overbank sedimentation can, for example, represent an important phosphorus sink.

erosion sediment yield sediment storage sediment budget floodplain sedimentation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abernethy, C., 1990. The use of river and reservoir sediment data for the study of regional soil erosion rates and trends. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Water Erosion, Sedimentation and Resource Conservation (Dehradun, India, October, 1990).Google Scholar
  2. Alford, D., 1992. Streamflow and sediment transport from mountain watersheds of the Chao Phraya basin, southern Thailand: a reconnaissance study. Mountain Res. Devel. 12: 257-268.Google Scholar
  3. Buringh, P. & R. Dudal, 1987. Agricultural land use in space and time. In Wolman, M. G. & F.G.A. Fournier (eds), Land transformation in agriculture, SCOPE Report no, 32, Wiley, Chichester: 9-43.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, M., F.A. Roth & E.V. Hunt, 1982. Sediment production under various forest site conditions. In Recent developments in the explanation and prediction of erosion and sediment yield, IAHS Publication no. 137: 13-22.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, E.H., J.A. Haverkamp & W. Chapman, 1985. Eroding soils: the off-farm impacts. The Conservation Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dai, D. & Y. Tan, 1996. Soil erosion and sediment yield in the Upper Yangtze basin. In Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb (eds) Erosion and sediment yield: global and regional perspectives, IAHS Publication no. 236: 191-203.Google Scholar
  7. Dedkov, A. P. & V. T. Mozzherin, 1984. Eroziya i stock nanosov na zemle, Izdatelstvo Kazanskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
  8. Degens, E. T., A. Paluska & E. Eriksson, 1976. Rates of soil erosion In Svensson, B. H. & R. Soderlund (eds), Nitrogen phosphorus and sulphur: global cycles, SCOPE Report no. 7, Stockholm: 185-191.Google Scholar
  9. Degens, E. T., S. Kempe & J. E. Richey, 1991. Summary: Biogeochemistry of major world rivers. In Degens, E. T., S. Kempe & J. E. Richey (eds), Biogeochemistry of Major World Rivers. Wiley, Chichester: 323-347.Google Scholar
  10. Dietrich, W. B. & T. Dunne, 1978. Sediment budget for a small catchment in mountainous terrain. Z. Geomorph. Supplbd. 29: 191-206.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, I., 1967. Man, vegetation and the sediment yields of rivers. Nature 215: 925-928.Google Scholar
  12. Fredriksen, R. L., 1970. Erosion and sedimentation following road construction and timber harvest on unstable soils in three small western Oregon watersheds. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper, PNW 104.Google Scholar
  13. Fustec, E., P. Bonte, J. C. Fardeau, L. Khebibeche, A. Chesterifoff & A. M. Carru, 1996. La rétention des MES et des polluants associés dans les zones inondables. In Piren-Seine Rapport 1996/II, Thème 'Corridor Fluvial', Laboratoire de Géologie Appliquée, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris: 3-3-3-16.Google Scholar
  14. Golosov, V. N., N. N. Ivanova, L. F. Litvin & A. Yu. Sidorchuk, 1992. Sediment budgets of river catchments and river channel aggradation on the Russian plain. Geomorphology (Moscow) 4: 62-71 [In Russian].Google Scholar
  15. Gong, S. & G. Xiong, 1980. The origin and transport of sediment of the Yellow River. In Proceedings of the first international symposium on river sedimentation, Beijing, China: 43-52.Google Scholar
  16. Gu, W., 1994. On the reduction of water and sediment yield of the Yellow River in later years. Int. J. Sediment. Res. 9: 1-12.Google Scholar
  17. He, Q. & D. E. Walling, 1996. Rates of overbank sedimentation on the floodplains of British lowland rivers documented using fallout caesium-137. Geogr. Ann. 78A: 223-234.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, Y. & P. Zhang, 1996. Erosion of material in ground surface and sediment yield in the Upper Yangtze River. Int. J. Sediment. Res. 11: 43-53.Google Scholar
  19. Lu, X & D. L. Higgitt, 1998. Recent changes of sediment yield in the Upper Yangtze, China. Env. Mmt. 22: 697-709.Google Scholar
  20. Marron, D. C., 1987. Floodplain storage of metal contaminated sediments downstream of a goldmine at Lead, South Dakota. In Averett, R. C. & D. M. McKnight (eds), Chemical Quality of Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Lewis, Chelsea, MI: 193-209.Google Scholar
  21. Meade, R. H. & R. S. Parker, 1985. Sediment in rivers of the United States. In National waters Summary 1984, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper no. 2275: 49-60.Google Scholar
  22. Meade, R. H. & S. Trimble, 1974. Changes in sediment loads in rivers of the Atlantic Drainage of the United States since 1900. In Effects of man on the interface of the hydrological cycle with the physical environment, IAHS Publication no. 113: 99-104.Google Scholar
  23. Milliman, J. D. & J. P. M. Syvitski, 1992. Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers. J. Geol. 100: 325-344.Google Scholar
  24. Milliman, J. D., Y.-S. Qin, M-E. Ren & Y. Saito, 1987. Man's in-fluence on the erosion and transport of sediment by Asian rivers: The Yellow River (Huanghe) example. J. Geol. 95: 751-762.Google Scholar
  25. Morgan, R.P.C., 1986. Soil erosion and Conservation. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
  26. Mou, J., 1996. Recent studies of the role of soil conservation in reducing erosion and sediment yield in the loess plateau area of the Yellow River basin. In Walling, D. E. & B.W. Webb (eds), Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives, IAHS Publication no. 236: 541-548.Google Scholar
  27. Mou, J. & Q. Meng, 1980. Sediment delivery ratio as used in the computation of the watershed sediment yield. Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  28. O'Loughlin, C. L., L. K. Rowe & A. J. Pearce, 1980. Sediment yield and water quality responses to cleafelling of evergreen mixed forests in Western New Zealand. In The influence of man on the hydrological regime,with special reference to representative and experimental basins, IAHS Publication no. 130: 285-292.Google Scholar
  29. Painter, R. B., K. Blyth, J. C. Mosedale & M. Kelly, 1974. The effect of afforestation on erosion processes and sediment yield. In Effects of man on the interface of the hydrological cycle with the physical environment, IAHS Publication no. 113: 150-157.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, J. D., 1992. Pre-and post-colonial sediment sources and storage in the Lower Neuse basin, North Carolina. Phys. Geogr. 14: 272-284.Google Scholar
  31. Summer, W., E. Klaghofer & K. Hintersteiner, 1996. Trends in soil erosion and sediment yield in the alpine basin of the Austrian Danube. In Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb (eds), Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives, IAHS Publication no. 236: 473-479.Google Scholar
  32. Tardy, Y., R. N'Kounkou & J.-L. Probst, 1989. The global water cycle and continental erosion during Phanerozoic time. Am. J. Sci. 289: 455-483.Google Scholar
  33. Trimble, S. W., 1981 Changes in sediment storage in Coon Creek Basin, Driftless Area,Wisconsin, 1853-1975. Science 214: 181-183.Google Scholar
  34. Vorosmarty, C. J., M. Meybeck, B. Fekete & K. Sharma, 1997. The potential impact of neo-Castorization on sediment transport by the global network of rivers. In Walling, D. E. & J.-L. Probst (eds), Human Impact on Erosion and Sedimentation, IAHS Publication no. 245: 261-273.Google Scholar
  35. Walling, D. E., 1983. The sediment delivery problem. J. Hydrol. 65: 209-237.Google Scholar
  36. Walling, D. E., 1988. Measuring sediment yield from river basins. In Lal, R. (ed.), Soil Erosion Research Methods. SoilWat. Conserv. Soc., Ankeny, Iowa: 39-73.Google Scholar
  37. Walling, D. E., 1995. Suspended sediment yields in a changing environment In Gurneu, A. & G. Petts (eds), Changing River Channels, Wiley, Chichester: 149-176.Google Scholar
  38. Walling, D. E. & Q. He, 1994. Rates of overbank sedimentation on the flood plains of several British rivers during the past 100 years. In Variability in stream erosion and sediment transport, IAHS Publication no. 224: 203-210.Google Scholar
  39. Walling, D. E. & Q. He, 1997a. Investigating spatial patterns of overbank sedimentation on river floodplains. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 99: 9-20.Google Scholar
  40. Walling, D. E.& Q. He, 1997b. Use of fallout caesium-137 in investigations of overbank sedimentation on river floodplains. Catena 29: 263-282.Google Scholar
  41. Walling, D. E. & Q. He, 1999. Changing rates of overbank sedimentation on the floodplains of British rivers during the past 100 years. In Brown, A. G. & T. A. Quine (eds), Fluvial Processes and Environmental Change. Wiley, Chichester (in press).Google Scholar
  42. Walling, D. E. & T. A. Quine, 1993. Using Chernobyl-derived fallout radionuclides to investigate the role of downstream conveyance losses in the suspended sediment budget of the River Severn, UK. Phys. Geogr. 14: 239-253.Google Scholar
  43. Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb, 1981. The reliability of suspended sediment load data. In Erosion and sediment transport measurement, IAHS Publication no. 133: 79-88.Google Scholar
  44. Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb, 1996. Erosion and sediment yield: a global overview. In Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb (eds), Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives, IAHS Publication no. 236: 3-19.Google Scholar
  45. Walling, D. E. & J. C. Woodward, 1995. Tracing suspended sediment sources in river basins: a case study of the River Culm, Devon, UK. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 46: 327-336.Google Scholar
  46. Walling, D. E., P. N. Owens & G. J. L. Leeks, 1998. The role of channel and floodplain storage in the suspended sediment budget of the River Ouse Yorkshire, UK. Geomorphology 22: 225-242.Google Scholar
  47. Walling, D. E., P. N. Owens & G. J. L. Leeks, 1999a. Fingerprinting suspended sediment sources in the catchment of the River Ouse, Yorkshire, UK, Hydrol. Proc. 13: 955-975.Google Scholar
  48. Walling, D. E., P. N. Owens & G. J. L. Leeks, 1999b. Rates of contemporary overbank sedimentation and sediment storage on floodplains of the main channel systems of the Ouse and Tweed catchments, UK. Hydrol. Proc. 13: 993-1009.Google Scholar
  49. Walling, D. E., J. C. Woodward & A. P. Nicholas 1993. A multi-parameter approach to fingerprinting suspended-sediment sources. In Tracers in hydrology, IAHS Publication no. 215: 329-338.Google Scholar
  50. Weiss, F. H., 1996. Sediment monitoring, long-term loads, balances and management strategies in southern Bavaria. In Walling, D. E. & B. W. Webb (eds), Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives, IAHS Publication no. 236: 575-582.Google Scholar
  51. Wolman, M. G. & A. P. Schick, 1967. Effects of construction on fluvial sediment: urban and suburban areas of Maryland. Wat. Res. 6: 1312-1326Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. E. Walling
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of ExeterExeterU.K

Personalised recommendations