, Volume 415, Issue 0, pp 207–211

Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil

  • Charles W. Boylen
  • Lawrence W. Eichler
  • John D. Madsen


Ecological evaluation of the impact of an exotic species upon native plant species is frequently a combination of historical data prior to introduction and after full establishment with little observation in between. The introduction of Myriophyllum spicatum L. (Eurasian watermilfoil) into Lake George, New York, U.S.A. was first noted in 1985. In 1987, a few newly established plants were allowed to grow unimpeded by human management to document the rate of colonization of this species into a new habitat with its ultimate dominance over, and systematic elimination of, native species. This changing community has been closely monitored over the past decade. Initially a 6 m2 grid system composed of 144 0.5 m2 plots with four radiating transect lines was laid out with the isolated M. spicatum plants as the center. The site was revisited between 1987 and 1997 to mark the extent of the developing M. spicatum bed and its effect on the composition of the native plant community. Since 1987, the area of dense growth has expanded in all directions, impeded only where some physical barrier, such as upper or lower water depth limits or sediment type curtailed its growth. Concurrently, with this expansion, a decline in species richness and abundance of native species was observed.

milfoil Myriophyllum spicatum aquatic plant communities exotic species invasive species submersed aquatic macrophytes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aiken, S. G., P. R. Newroth & I. Wile, 1979. The biology of Canadian weeds. 34. Myriophyllum spicatum L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59: 201–215.Google Scholar
  2. Coffey, B. T. & C. D. McNabb, 1974. Eurasian watermilfoil in Michigan. Mich. Bot. 13: 159–165. Couch, R. & E. Nelson, 1985. Myriophyllum spicatum in North America. In Proc. First Int. Symp. on watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and related Haloragaceae species. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Aquat. Plant Mgmt Soc. 8–18.Google Scholar
  3. Daubenmire, R., 1968. Plant Communities: A Textbook of Synecology. Harper & Row, NY: 300 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Madsen, J. D., C. F. Hartleb & C.W. Boylen, 1991a. Photosynthetic characteristics of Myriophyllum spicatum and six submersed aquatic macrophyte species native to Lake George, New York. Freshwat. Biol. 26: 233–240.Google Scholar
  5. Madsen, J. D., J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, L. W. Eichler & C. W. Boylen, 1991b. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. Aquat. Plant Mgmt 29: 94–99.Google Scholar
  6. Newroth, P. R., 1985. A review of Eurasian Watermilfoil impacts and management in British Columbia. In Proc. First Int. Symp. on watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and related Haloragaceae species, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Aquat. Plant Mgmt Soc. 139–153.Google Scholar
  7. Nichols, S. A. & B. H. Shaw, 1986. Ecological life histories of the three aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus, and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia 131: 3–21.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, C. S. & J.W. Barko, 1990. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Mgmt 28: 55–64.Google Scholar
  9. Smith, G. E., T. F. Hall & R. A. Stanley, 1966. Eurasian watermilfoil in the Tennessee Valley. Weed: 15: 95–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Boylen
    • 1
  • Lawrence W. Eichler
    • 1
  • John D. Madsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Darrin Fresh Water InstituteRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyU.S.A
  2. 2.VicksburgU.S.A

Personalised recommendations