# Aspects of the Nature and State of Research in Mathematics Education

Article

- 594 Downloads
- 30 Citations

## Abstract

This paper offers an outline and a characterisation of the didactics of mathematics, alias the science of mathematics education, as a scientific and scholarly discipline, and discusses why its endeavours should be of interest to research mathematicians (and other mathematics professionals). It further presents and discusses a number of major, rather aggregate findings in the discipline, including the *astonishing complexity of mathematical learning, the key role of domain specificity, obstacles produced by the process-object duality, students' alienation from proof and proving*, and *the marvels and pitfalls of information technology in mathematics education*.

## Keywords

Information Technology Mathematics Education Domain Specificity Mathematical Learning Research Mathematician
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Alibert, D. and Thomas, M.: 1991, ‘Research on mathematical proof’, in D. Tall (ed.), Chapter 13, pp. 215–230.Google Scholar
- Artigue, M.: 1987, ‘Ingénierie didactique à propos d'équations differentielles’, in
*Proceedings of PME 11*, Montréal, pp. 236–242.Google Scholar - Balacheff, N. and Kaput, J.: 1996, ‘Computer-based learning environments in mathematics’, in Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.):
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1996, Chapter 13, pp. 469–501.Google Scholar - Biehler, R., Scholz, R.W., Strässer, R. and Winkelmann, B. (eds.): 1994,
*Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Bishop, A.: 1988,
*Mathematical Enculturation. A Cultural Perspective on Mathematics Education*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Bishop, A., Mellin-Olsen, S. and Van Dormolen, J. (eds.): 1991,
*Mathematical Knowledge: Its Growth Through Teaching*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Bishop, A., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.): 1996,
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Bodin, A.: 1993, ‘What does to assess mean? The case of assessing mathematical knowledge’, in M. Niss (ed.), 1993a, pp. 113–141.Google Scholar
- Cobb, P. and Bauersfeld, H.: 1995,
*The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures*, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar - Douady, R.: 1991, ‘Tool, object, setting, window’, in Mellin-Olsen, S. and Van Dormolen, J. (eds.):
*Mathematical Knowledge: Its Growth Through Teaching*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1991, pp. 109–130.Google Scholar - Ellerton, N. and Clarkson, P.: 1996, ‘Language factors in mathematics teaching and learning’, in Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.):
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1996, Chapter 26, pp. 987–1033.Google Scholar - Ernest, P.: 1991,
*The Philosophy of Mathematics Education*, London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar - Fischbein, E.: 1989, ‘Tacit models and mathematics reasoning’,
*For the Learning of Mathematics*9(2), 9–14.Google Scholar - Grouws, D. (ed.): 1992,
*Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning*, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar - Hanna, G. and Jahnke, H.N., 1996, ‘Proof and proving’, in Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.):
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1996, Chapter 23, pp. 877–908.Google Scholar - Heid, K.: 1997, ‘The technological revolution and the reform of school mathematics’,
*American Journal of Education*106(1), 5–61.Google Scholar - Hiebert, J. and Carpenter, T.: 1992, ‘Learning and teaching with understanding’, in D. Grouws (ed.), pp. 65–97.Google Scholar
- Janvier, C. (ed.): 1985,
*Problems of Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics*, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar - Leder, G. (ed.): 1992,
*Assessment and Learning of Mathematics*, Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, VIC.Google Scholar - Leron, U.: 1983, ‘Structuring mathematical proofs’,
*The American Mathematical Monthly*90(3), 174–184.Google Scholar - Leron, U.: 1985, ‘Heuristic presentations: the role of structuring’,
*For the Learning of Mathematics*5(3), 7–13.Google Scholar - Niss, M. (ed.): 1993a,
*Investigations into Assessment in Mathematics Education — An ICMI Study*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Niss, M. (ed.): 1993b,
*Cases of Assessment in Mathematics Education — An ICMI Study*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Niss, M.: 1994, ‘Mathematics and society’, in Scholz, R.W., Strässer, R. and Winkelmann, B. (eds.):
*Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. R. Biehler et al. (eds.), pp. 367–387.Google Scholar - Niss, M.: 1996, ‘Goals of mathematics teaching’, in Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.):
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1996, Chapter 1, 11–47.Google Scholar - Nunes, T., Schliemann, A.D., and Carraher, D.W.: 1993,
*Street Mathematics and School Mathematics*, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar - Pehkonen, E. and Törner, G.: 1996: ‘Mathematical beliefs and different aspects of their meaning’,
*Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik*28(4), 101–108.Google Scholar - Pimm, D.: 1987,
*Speaking Mathematically: Communication in Mathematics Classrooms*, Routledge and Paul Kegan, London.Google Scholar - Robert, A.: 1982, ‘L'Acquisition de la notion de convergence des suites numériques dans l'Enseignement Supérieur’,
*Recherches en Didactiques des Mathématiques*3(3), 307–341.Google Scholar - Ruthven, K.: 1996, ‘Calculators in the mathematics curriculum: the scope of personal computational technology’, in Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.):
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1996, Chapter 12, pp. 435–468.Google Scholar - Schoenfeld, A.: 1983, ‘Beyond the purely cognitive: belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance’,
*Cognitive Science*7(4), 329–363.Google Scholar - Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*22(1), 1–36.Google Scholar - Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L.: 1994, ‘The gains and pitfalls of reification — the case of algebra’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*26(3), 191–228.Google Scholar - Sierpinska, A.: 1994,
*Understanding in Mathematics*, The Falmer Press, London.Google Scholar - Sierpinska, A. and Kilpatrick, J. (eds.): 1998,
*Mathematics Education as a Research Domain — An ICMI Study*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Sierpinska, A. and Lerman, S.: 1996, ‘Epistemologies of mathematics and of mathematics education’, in Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.):
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands A. Bishop et al. (eds.), 1996, Chapter 22, pp. 827–876.Google Scholar - Skovsmose, O.: 1994,
*Towards a Philosophy of Critical Mathematics Education*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Tall, D. (ed.): 1991,
*Advanced Mathematical Thinking*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar - Tall, D.: 1992, ‘The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: functions, limits, infinity, and proof’, in D. Grouws (ed.), pp. 495–511.Google Scholar
- Tall, D. and Vinner, S.: 1981, ‘Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*12(2), 151–169.Google Scholar - Tirosh, D.: 1991, ‘Intuitions on infinity and the cantorian theory’, in D. Tall (ed.), Chapter 12, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
- Vergnaud, G.: 1990, ‘La théorie des champs conceptuels’,
*Recherches en Didactiques des Mathématiques*10(2/3), 133–170.Google Scholar - Vinner, S.: 1991, ‘The role of definitions in teaching and learning’, in D. Tall (ed.), Chapter 5, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
- Vinner, S., and Dreyfus, T.: 1989, ‘Images and definitions for the concept of functions’,
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*20(4), 356–66.Google Scholar - Wittmann, E.: 1995, Mathematics education as a
*“Design Science”*,*Educational Studies in Mathematics*29(4), 355–374.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999