Is Indistinguishability in Quantum Mechanics Conventional?
- 80 Downloads
Darrin Belousek has argued that the indistinguishability of quantum particles is conventional “in the Duhemian–Einsteinian sense,” in part by critially examining prior arguments given by Redhead and Teller. Belousek's discussion provides a useful occasion to clarify some of those arguments, acknowledge respects in which they were misleading, and comment on how they can be strengthened. We also comment briefly on the relevant sense of “conventional.”
KeywordsQuantum Mechanics Quantum Particle Relevant Sense Prior Argument
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. Belousek, “Statistics, symmetry, and the conventionality of indistinguishability in quantum mechanics,” Found.Phys. 30, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
- 2.M. Redhead and P. Teller, “Particles, particle labels, and quanta: The toll of unacknowledged metaphysics,” Found.Phys. 21, 43–62 (1991).Google Scholar
- 3.M. Redhead and P. Teller, “Particle-labels and the theory of indistinguishable particles in quantum mechanics,” Brit.J.Phil.Sci. 43, 201–218 (1992).Google Scholar
- 4.P. Teller, An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
- 5.S. French and M. Redhead, “Quantum physics and the identity of indiscernibles,” Brit.J.Phil.Sci. 39, 233–246 (1988).Google Scholar
- 6.B. van Fraassen, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
- 7.J. Cushing, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony (University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar