, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 83–90 | Cite as

Effect of cytokinins and lines on plant regeneration from long-term callus and suspension cultures of Allium cepa L.

  • Sijun Zheng
  • Betty Henken
  • Eri Sofiari
  • Paul Keizer
  • Evert Jacobsen
  • Chris Kik
  • Frans Krens


Suspension cultures were initiated from callus cultures of Allium cepa, which had been precultured on a solidified medium for 7 months. For another 3 months the 83 callus lines were kept in suspension culture. Each line is derived from a single zygotic embryo, 24 lines from onion and 59 lines from shallot. Of these, 20 suspension lines showed adequate growth and were used to test the effect of cytokinins on plant regeneration. On average, 1.25% of the calli produced shoots on a growth regulator-free medium (MS30: MS basal medium supplemented with 30 g/l sucrose). Thus plant regeneration decreased significantly with time because the overall average plant regeneration frequency was 35.5% after 3 months of culture on solidified medium. Plant regeneration after 3 months proved not to be a reliable predictor of plant regeneration after 10 months in vitro culture. Overall only 0.25–0.88% of the calli produced shoots when the regeneration medium was supplemented with different types and concentrations of cytokinins. Contrary to expectations, the type and concentration of cytokinins could not increase the shoot regeneration capacity. However as expected, the increasing cytokinin concentration (especially TDZ at the range of 1–5 mg/l) led to a decrease in root formation. Plant regeneration proved to be highly dependent upon the line used. The best line was atm24 with an overall shoot regeneration capacity of 4.62% (among the 13 treatments); it had its highest shoot regeneration on MS30 treatment with 12.5%. The results obtained show that for the development of a reliable transformation protocol only young callus material (< 3 months), which has still a high regeneration potential, can be used.

line onion regeneration shallot suspension culture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bajaj, S. & M.V. Rajam, 1996. Polyamine accumulation and near loss of morphogenesis in long-term callus cultures of rice — Restoration of plant regeneration by manipulation of cellular polyamine levels. Plant Physiol 112: 1343–1348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhaskaran, S. & R.H. Smith, 1990. Regeneration in cereal tissue culture: a review. Crop Sci 30: 1328–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Böhmer, P., B. Meyer & H.J. Jacobsen, 1995. Thidiazuron-induced high frequency of shoot induction and plant regeneration in protoplast derived pea callus. Plant Cell Rep 15: 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buiteveld, J., P. van der Valk, J. Jansen, J. Creemers-Molenaar & C.M. Colijn-Hooymans, 1993. Callus induction and plant regeneration from explants of commercial cultivars of leek (Allium ampeloprasum var. porrum L.). Plant Cell Rep 12: 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buiteveld, J., P.F. Fransz & J. Creemers-Molenaar, 1994. Induction and characterization of embryogenic callus types for the initiation of suspension cultures of leek (Allium ampeloprasum L.). Plant Sci 100: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cecchini, E., L. Natali, A. Cavallini & M. Durante, 1992. DNA variations in regenerated plants of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 84: 874–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunstan, D.I. & K.C. Short, 1977. Improved growth of tissue cultures of the onion, Allium cepa. Physiol Plant 41: 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fellman, C.D., P.E. Read & M.A. Hosier, 1987. Effects of thidiazuron and CPPU on meristem formation and shoot proliferation. Hort Sci 22: 1197–1200.Google Scholar
  9. Hansen, E.E., J.F. Hubstenberger & G.C. Phillips, 1995. Regeneration of shoots from cell suspension-derived protoplasts of Allium cepa. Plant Cell Rep 15: 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karim, M.A. & T. Adachi, 1997. Cell suspension, isolation and culture of protoplast of Allium cepa. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 51: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, J.W. & W.Y. Soh, 1996. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from suspension cultures of Allium fistulosum L. Plant Sci 114: 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin, H.S., M.J. De Jeu & E. Jacobsen, 1997. Direct shoot regeneration from excised leaf explants of in vitro grown seedlings of Alstroemeria L. Plant Cell Rep 16: 770–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu, C.C., L. Currah & E.B. Peffley, 1989. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in diploid Allium fistulosum × A. cepa F1 hybrid onions. Plant Cell Rep 7: 696–700.Google Scholar
  14. McCullagh, P. & J.A. Nelder, 1990. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London & New York.Google Scholar
  15. Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mok, M.C., D.W.S. Mok, J.E. Tuner & C.V. Mujer, 1987. Biological and biochemical effects of cytokinin-active phenylurea derivative in tissue culture systems. Hort Sci 22: 1194–1197.Google Scholar
  17. Nagasawa, A. & J.J. Finer, 1988. Development of morphogenic suspension cultures of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 15: 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Phillips, G.C. & K.J. Luteyn, 1983. Effects of picloram and other auxins on onion tissue cultures. J. Am Soc Hort Sci 108: 948–953.Google Scholar
  19. Phillips, G.C. & J.F. Hubstenberger, 1987. Plant regeneration in vitro of selected Allium species and interspecific hybrids. Hort Sci 22: 124–125.Google Scholar
  20. Puolimatka, M. & A. Karp, 1993. Effect of genotype on chromosome variation in tissue culture of inbred and outbred rye. Heredity 71: 138–144.Google Scholar
  21. Saker, M.M., 1998. In vitro regeneration of onion through repetitive somatic embryogenesis. Biologia Plantarum 40 (4): 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarwar, M. & R.M. Skirvin, 1997. Effect of thidiazuron and 6-benzylaminopurine on adventitious shoot regeneration from leaves of three strains of ‘McIntosh’ apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) in vitro. Scientia Hort 68: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schum, A., H. Junge & L. Mattiesch, 1994. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Allium porrum L. Gartenbauwissenschaft 59: 26–30.Google Scholar
  24. Shahin, E.A. & K. Kaneko, 1986. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from callus cultures of nonbulbing onions. Hort Sci 21: 294–295.Google Scholar
  25. Silvertand, B., A. van Rooyen, P. Lavrijsen, A.M. van Harten & E. Jacobsen, 1996. Plant regeneration via organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in callus cultures derived from mature zygotic embryos of leek (Allium ampeloprasum L.). Euphytica 91: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Song, P. & E.B. Peffley, 1994. Plant regeneration from suspension cultures of Allium fistulosum and A. fistulosum × A. cepa interspecific hybrid. Plant Sci 98: 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Valk, P., O.E. Scholten, F. Verstappen, R.C. Jansen & J.J.M. Dons, 1992. High frequency somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from zygotic embryo-derived callus cultures of three Allium species. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 30: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, H. & P. Debergh, 1995. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in garden leek. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 43: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zheng, S., 1992. Chromosome variation in callus culture of Gossypium hirsutum L. In: R.P. Adams (Ed), Conservation of Plant Genes, DNA Banking and in vitro Biotechnology, pp. 211–221. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  30. Zheng, S., B. Henken, E. Sofiari, E. Jacobsen, F.A. Krens & C. Kik, 1998. Factors influencing induction, propagation and regeneration of mature zygotic embryo-derived callus from Allium cepa. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 53: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sijun Zheng
    • 1
  • Betty Henken
    • 1
  • Eri Sofiari
    • 2
  • Paul Keizer
    • 1
  • Evert Jacobsen
    • 3
  • Chris Kik
    • 1
  • Frans Krens
    • 1
  1. 1.DLO-Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO)WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Research Institute for Vegetables (Balitsa)LembangIndonesia
  3. 3.Department of Plant Breeding, WageningenAgricultural University (WAU), Department of Plant BreedingWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations