Hydrobiologia

, 394:209

Performance of some diversity and biotic indices in rivers affected by coal mining in northwestern Spain

  • F. García-Criado
  • A. Tomé
  • F. J. Vega
  • C. Antolín
Article

Abstract

Diversity and biotic indices are often used to asses freshwater quality. However, few studies have been made of their applicability to mining-derived impact. Biotic indices, in particular, are problematic in this respect because they are devised for specific types of pollution (usually organic). Thus, caution is required when using them in streams contaminated by other classes of pollutants. This study evaluates the performance of several diversity and biotic indices in rivers affected by coal mining in northwestern Spain. The relation between them and a set of environmental variables has been determined by means of correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient). According to the correlation analysis, the variables most related to the biological parameters were by far those indicating mining impact (sulfate and conductivity). In general, the rest of the variables (nitrate, orthophosphate, chloride, distance from the source, among others) were not significantly correlated with th e biological indices. BMWP' (a Spanish version of the BMWP) and family richness of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT family richness) were the indices most succesful in detecting mining impact, as shown by their high correlation with conductivity and sulfate. ASPT' (derived from BMWP'), the Shannon index and family richness were of lesser indicative value. These results suggest that some biotic indices may be a useful tool for monitoring water quality in rivers receiving coal mine drainage. BMWP', in particular, could be a good starting point for devising a biotic index specific to this type of pollution.

diversity indices biotic indices coal mining pollution macroinvertebrates 

References

  1. Alba-Tercedor, J. & A. Sánchez-Ortega, 1988. Un método rápido y simple para evaluar la calidad biológica de las aguas corrientes basado en el de Hellawell (1987). Limnética 4: 51–56.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, P. D., 1980. The effects of mine drainage and organic enrichment on benthos in the River Nent system, Northern Pennines. Hydrobiologia 74: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Wat. Res. 17: 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, D., P. L. Younger, R. T. Arnesen, E. R. Iversen & S. B. Banks, 1997. Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Environmental Geology 32 (3): 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargos, T., J.Ma Mesanza, A. Basaguren & E. Orive, 1990. Assessing river water quality by means of multifactorial methods using macroinvertebrates. A comparative study of main water courses of Biscay. Wat. Res. 24: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, D. R. & J. L. Metcalfe-Smith, 1992. A comparison of sampling techniques and summary indices for assessment of water quality in the Yamaska River, Québec, based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 21: 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camargo, J. A. & D. García de Jalón, 1995. Assessing the influence of altitude and temperature on biological monitoring of freshwater quality: A preliminary investigation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 35: 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canton, S. P. & J. W. Chadwick, 1983. Seasonal and longitudinal changes in invertebrate functional groups in the Dolores River, Colorado. Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 2 (1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canton, S. P. & J. V. Ward, 1981. The aquatic insects, with emphasis on Trichoptera, of a Colorado stream affected by coal strip-mine drainage. The Southwestern Naturalist 25: 453–460.Google Scholar
  10. Chadwick, J. W. & S. P. Canton, 1984. Inadequacy of diversity indices in discerning metal mine drainage effects on a stream invertebrate community. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 22: 217–223.Google Scholar
  11. Chadwick, J. W., S. P. Canton & R. L. Dent, 1986. Recovery of benthic invertebrate communities in Silver Bow Creek, Montana, following improved metal mine wastewater treatment. Wat. Air Soil Pollut., 28: 427–438.Google Scholar
  12. Clements, W. H., 1994. Benthic invertebrate responses to heavy metals in the Upper Arkansas River Basin, Colorado. J. n. Am. Benthol. Soc. 13 (1): 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clements, W. H., D. S. Cherry & J. H. Van Hassel, 1992. Assessment of the impact of heavy metals on benthic communities at the Clinch River (Virginia): Evaluation of an index of community sensitivity. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 49: 1686–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clements, W. H. & P. M. Kiffney, 1995. The influence of elevation on benthic community responses to heavy metals in Rocky Mountain streams. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci., 52: 1966–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Pauw, N. & D. Roels, 1988. Relationship between biological and chemical indicators of surface water quality. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 23: 1553–1558.Google Scholar
  16. Evangelou, V. P. & Y. L. Zhang, 1995. A review: Pyrite oxidation mechanisms and acid mine drainage prevention. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 25 (2): 141–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gower, A. M., G. Myers, M. Kent & M. E. Foulkes, 1995. The use of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the assessment of metalcontaminated streams. In D. M. Harper, A. J. D. Ferguson (eds), The Ecological Basis for River Management. JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.: 181–192.Google Scholar
  18. Graça, M. A. S. & C. N. Coimbra, 1998. The elaboration of indices to assess biological water quality. A case study. Wat. Res. 32: 380–392.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, N. F., 1996. The use of an objective index for the assessment of the contamination of surface water and groundwater by acid mine drainage. J. CIWEM 10: 332–340.Google Scholar
  20. Growns, J. E., B. C. Chessman, P. K. McEvoy & I. A. Wright, 1995. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: Case studies in the Nepean River and Blue Mountains, NSW. Aus. J. Ecol. 20: 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, R. K., T. Wiederholm & D. M. Rosenberg, 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring using individual organisms, populations, and species assemblages of benthic macroinvertebrates. In D.M. Rosenberg & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall: 40–158.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, S. & R. A. Roline, 1996. Recovery of stream macroinvertebrate community from mine drainage disturbance. Hydrobiologia 339: 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raddum, G. G. & A. Fjellheim, 1984. Acidification and early warning organisms in freshwater in western Norway. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1973–1980.Google Scholar
  24. Raddum, G. G., A. Fjellheim & T. Hesthagen, 1988. Monitoring of acidification by the use of aquatic organisms. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 23: 2291–2297.Google Scholar
  25. Richards, C., G. E. Host & J. W. Arthur, 1993. Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwat. Biol. 29: 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodríguez, P. & J. F. Wright, 1991. Description and evaluation of a sampling strategy for macroinvertebrate communities in Basque rivers (Spain). Hydrobiologia 213: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roline, R. A., 1988. The effects of heavy metals pollution of the upper Arkansas River on the distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 160: 3–8.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, S. & A. M. Ghazi, 1997. Release of sorbed sulfate from iron oxyhydroxides precipitated from acid mine drainage associated with coal mining. Envir. Sci. Technol. 31: 2136–2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rossaro, B. & A. Pietrangelo, 1993. Macroinvertebrate distribution in streams: a comparison of CA ordination with biotic indices. Hydrobiologia 263: 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruse, L. P., 1996. Multivariate techniques relating macroinvertebrate and environmental data from a river catchment. Wat. Res. 30: 3017–3024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Webb, J. A. & I. D. Sasowsky, 1994. The interaction of acid mine drainage with a carbonate terrane: evidence from the Obey River, north-central Tennessee. Journal of Hydrology 161: 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whiting, E. R., S. Mathieu & D. W. Parker, 1994. Effects of drainage from a molybdenum mine and mill on stream macroinvertebrate communities. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 9 (4): 299–311.Google Scholar
  33. Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Younger, P. L., 1995. Hydrogeochemistry of minewaters flowing from abandoned coal workings in County Durham. Quaterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 28: 101–113Google Scholar
  35. Zamora-Muñoz, C., C. E. Sáinz-Cantero, A. Sánchez-Ortega & J. Alba-Tercedor, 1995. Are biological indices BMWP0 and ASPT0 and their significance regarding water quality seasonally dependent? Factors explaining their variations. Wat. Res. 29: 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. García-Criado
    • 1
  • A. Tomé
    • 1
  • F. J. Vega
    • 1
  • C. Antolín
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto Biología Animal, Facultad de BiologíaUniversidad de LeónLeónSpain

Personalised recommendations