Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 145–168 | Cite as

The Beginning of Statistical Inference: Comparing two Data Sets

  • Jane M. Watson
  • Jonathan B. Moritz


The development of school students' understanding of comparing two data sets is explored through responses of students in individual interview settings. Eighty-eight students in grades 3 to 9 were presented with data sets in graphical form for comparison. Student responses were analysed according to a developmental cycle which was repeated in two contexts: one where the numbers of values in the data sets were the same and the other where they were different. Strategies observed within the developmental cycles were visual, numerical, or a combination of the two. The correctness of outcomes associated with using and combining these strategies varied depending upon the task and the developmental level of the response. Implications for teachers, educational planners and researchers are discussed in relation to the beginning of statistical inference during the school years.


Statistical Inference Proportional Reasoning Unequal Sample Size Visual Strategy Summary Sheet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Australian Education Council: 1991, A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools, Curriculum Corporation, Carlton, Vic.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Education Council: 1994a, MathematicsA curriculum profile for Australian schools, Curriculum Corporation, Carlton, Vic.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Education Council: 1994b, Mathematicswork samples, Curriculum Corporation, Carlton, Vic.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. B.: 1992, 'Modes of learning, forms of knowing, and ways of schooling', in A. Demetriou, M. Shayer and A. Efklides (Eds.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Implications and applications for education, Routledge, London, pp. 31–51.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F.: 1982, Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Case, R.: 1988, 'Neo-Piagetian theory: Retrospect and prospect', in A. Demetriou (Ed.), The neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Toward an integration, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 267–285.Google Scholar
  7. Collis, K. F. and Romberg, T. A.: 1992, Collis-Romberg mathematical problem-solving profiles, Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, Victoria.Google Scholar
  8. Corwin, R. B. and Russell, S. J.: 1990, Used numbers. Measuring: From paces to feet, Dale Seymour Publications, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Department for Education (England and Wales): 1995, Mathematics in the national curriculum, Author, London.Google Scholar
  10. Friel, S. N., Mokros, J. R. and Russell, S. J.: 1992, Used numbers. Statistics: Middles, means, and in-betweens, Dale Seymour Publications, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Gal, I.: 1995, 'Statistical tools and statistical literacy: The case of the average', Teaching Statistics 17, 97–99.Google Scholar
  12. Gal, I., Rothschild, K. and Wagner, D. A.: 1989, April, 'Which group is better? The development of statistical reasoning in elementary school children', Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City.Google Scholar
  13. Gal, I., Rothschild, K. and Wagner, D. A.: 1990, April, 'Statistical concepts and statistical reasoning in school children: Convergence or divergence?', Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Gal, I. and Wagner, D. A.: 1992, 'Project STARC: Statistical reasoning in the classroom', (Annual Report: Year 2, NSF Grant No. MDR90-50006). Philadelphia, PA: Literacy Research Center, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, A.: 1987, Statistical investigations in the secondary school, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Lehrer, R. and Romberg, T.: 1996, 'Exploring children's data modeling', Cognition and Instruction 14(1), 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education: 1992, Statistics in the New Zealand curriculum, Wellington, NZ.Google Scholar
  18. Mokros, J. and Russell, S. J.: 1995, 'Children's concepts of average and representativeness', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, D. S.: 1990, 'Statistics for all: Why, what and how?', in D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Volume 1. School and General Issues, International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, The Netherlands, pp. 423–428.Google Scholar
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1989, Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, S. J. and Corwin, R. B.: 1989, Used numbers. The shape of the data, Dale Seymour Publications, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Shaughnessy, J. M., Garfield, J. and Greer, B.: 1996, 'Data handling', in A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education. Part 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 205–237.Google Scholar
  23. Watson, J. M.: 1994, 'Instruments to assess statistical concepts in the school curriculum', in National Organizing Committee (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Vol. 1. National Institute of Statistics and Applied Economics, Rabat, Morocco, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
  24. Watson, J. M., Collis, K. F. and Campbell, K. J.: 1995, 'Developmental structure in the understanding of common and decimal fractions', Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 17(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  25. Watson, J. M., Collis, K. F. and Moritz, J. B.: 1994, 'Assessing statistical understanding in Grades 3, 6 and 9 using a short answer questionnaire', in G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson and G. Geake (Eds.), Challenges in Mathematics Education: Constraints on Construction, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Lismore, NSW, pp. 675–682.Google Scholar
  26. Watson, J. M., Collis, K. F. and Moritz, J. B.: 1997, 'The development of chance measurement', Mathematics Education Research Journal 9, 62–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane M. Watson
    • 1
  • Jonathan B. Moritz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood/Primary EducationUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia; E-mail

Personalised recommendations