Higher Education

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 177–195

Organizational socialization and induction in universities: Reconceptualizing theory and practice

  • Paul Trowler
  • Peter Knight
Article

Abstract

This paper argues that the theory and practice of induction and socialization of new academic staff in universities have been based on a partial, corporatist, perspective influenced by now defunct structural-functionalist theory. We develop a more sophisticated theoretical understanding of organizational socialization and explore its consequences for the practice of induction of new academic staff. These ideas are based on secondary data derived from a number of studies of new academic appointees (NAAs), 27 in-depth interviews we conducted with academics in ten Canadian and English universities, both chartered and unchartered, and a five year ethnographic study of academic staff in a single unchartered English university.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, D. (1996). In At The Deep End: First Experiences of University Teaching. Lancaster University: Unit for Innovations in HE.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (1993). Cultural Perspectives on Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, F.G. (1977). Morality and Expediency. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Beaty, L. (1996). Becoming an Academic: Case Studies of the First Year Experience. Paper delivered to SRHE conference, December.Google Scholar
  5. Becher, T. (1988). ‘Principles and politics: An interpretative framework for university management’, in Westoby, A. (ed.), Culture and Power in Educational Organizations. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, pp. 317-328.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Birnbaum, R. (1992). How Academic Leadership Works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, R.T. and Lawrence, J.H. (1995). Faculty at Work. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blackler, F. (1994). ‘Changing organizations. Inaugural lecture delivered at Lancaster University, 1.12.1993’, in Lancaster University Inaugural Lectures 1993-94. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  10. Blackler, F. (1995). ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and analysis’, Organization Studies 16(6), 1021-1046.Google Scholar
  11. Boice, R. (1992). The New Faculty Member: Supporting and Fostering Professional Development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Boyer, E., Altbach, P. and Whitelaw, M.J. (1994). The Academic Profession: An international Perspective. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, G. and Atkins, M. (1988). Effective Teaching in Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bullis, C. (1993). ‘Organizational socialization research: Enabling, constraining, and shifting perspectives’, Communication Monographs (March) 60, pp. 10-17.Google Scholar
  15. Cross, W.T. (1991). ‘Pathway to the professoriate: The American Indian faculty pipeline’, Journal of American Indian Education 30(2), 13-24.Google Scholar
  16. CVCP (1992). ‘Resourceful induction: A manual of materials for higher education’, in Hardwick, B. (ed.), CVCP Universities' Staff Development and Training Unit. London: CVCP.Google Scholar
  17. Dahrendorf, R. (1968). Homo Sociologicus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Deetz, S.A. (1992). Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deming, W.E. (1993). The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. Cambridge MA: MIT Centre for Advanced Engineering Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Ducharme, E.R. (1996). The Lives of Teacher Educators. New York: Teachers' College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dunn, D., Rouse, L. and Seff, M.A. (1994). ‘New faculty socialization in the academic workplace’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.), Higher Education: Theory and Research, Volume 10. New York: Agathon, pp. 374-416.Google Scholar
  22. Fay, B. (1975). Social Theory and Political Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Gappa, J.M. and Leslie, D.W. (1993). The Invisible Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Gibson, G.W. (1992). Good Start: A Guidebook for New Faculty in Liberal Arts Colleges. Bolton MA: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1983). ‘Comments on the theory of structuration’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13, 75-80.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  29. Grace, G. (1995). School Leadership — Beyond Education Management: An Essay in Policy Scholarship. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  30. Guba, E. and Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Hardy, C. (1996). The Politics of Collegiality. Montreal and Kingston: McGill University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Helsby, G. and Knight, P.T. (1997). ‘Continuing professional development and the national curriculum’, in Helsby, G. and McCulloch, G. (eds.), Teachers and the National Curriculum. London: Cassell, pp. 181-194.Google Scholar
  33. Knight, P.T. (1998). ‘Professional obsolescence and continuing professional development in higher education’, Innovation in Education and Training International 35(3), 241-248.Google Scholar
  34. Lincoln, Y.S. (1986). ‘A future-oriented comment on the state of the profession’, Review of Higher Education 10, 135-142.Google Scholar
  35. McCracken, G. (1988). The Long Interview. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. McDermott, R. and Varenne, H. (1995). ‘Culture as disability’, Anthropology and Education Quarterly 26(3), 324-348.Google Scholar
  37. Merton, R. (ed.) (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: New York Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Perry, R.P., Menec, V.H., Struthers, C.W., Hechter, F.J., Schönwetter, D.J. and Menges, R.J. (1996). Faculty in Transition: The Adjustment of New Hires to Postsecondary Institutions. Winnipeg MB: Centre for Higher Education Research and Development.Google Scholar
  39. Polanyi, M. (1983). The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  40. Rust, C. (1985). The First Year Experience. London: SEDA.Google Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Successful Intelligence. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  42. Teboul, B.J.C. (1984). ‘Facing and coping with uncertainty during organizational encounter’, Management Communications Quarterly 8(2), 190-224.Google Scholar
  43. Tierney, W. (1997). ‘Organizational socialization in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education 68(1), 1-16.Google Scholar
  44. Tierney, W. and Bensimon, E.M. (1996). Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tierney, W. and Rhoads, R.A. (1994). Enhancing Promotion, Tenure, and Beyond: Faculty Socialization as a Cultural Process ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, report 6.Google Scholar
  46. Trowler, P.R. (1998). Academics Responding to Change: New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.Google Scholar
  47. Van Maanen, J. (1976). ‘Breaking in: Socialization to work’, in Dubin, R. (ed.), Handbook or Work, Organization and Society. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 67-130.Google Scholar
  48. Van Maanen, J. and Schein, E.H. (1979). ‘Toward a theory of organizational socialization’, in Straw, B.M. (ed.), Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  49. Weimer, M. and Lenze, L.F. (1991). ‘Instructional interventions: A review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.), Higher Education: A Handbook of Theory and Practice, Vol. 3. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  50. Wrong, D. (1966). ‘The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology’, in Coser, L. and Rosenberg. B. (eds.), Sociological Theory. London: Macmillan. (First published in the American Sociological Review XXVI, 184-193.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Trowler
    • 1
  • Peter Knight
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Education StudiesUniversity of Central LancashirePreston Lancashire
  2. 2.Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancaster

Personalised recommendations