, Volume 105, Issue 1, pp 35–42 | Cite as

Size and shape heritability in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata: temporal and microgeographical variation

  • Blanche Christine Bitner‐Mathé
  • Louis Bernard Klaczko


‘Traditional morphometrics’ allows us to decompose morphological variation into its major independent sources, identifying them usually as size and shape. To compare and investigate the properties of size and shape in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata, estimating their heritabilities and analysing their temporal and microgeographic changes, we carried out collections on seven occasions in Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Brazil. In one of these collections, we took samples from five different altitudes. Measurements were taken from wild caught inseminated females and up to three of their laboratory‐reared daughters. Through a principal component analysis, three major sources of variation were identified as due to size (the first one) and shape (the remaining two). The overall amount of variation among laboratory flies was about half of that observed among wild flies and this reduction was primarily due to size. Shape variation was about the same under natural and artificial conditions. A genetic altitudinal cline was detected for size and shape, although altitude explained only a small part of their variation. Differences among collections were detected both for size and shape in wild and laboratory flies, but no simple pattern emerged. Shape variation had high heritability in nature, close to or above 40% and did not vary significantly temporally. Although on the overall size heritability (18 ± 6%)was significant its estimates were not consistent along months – they were non‐significant in all but one month, when it reached a value of 51 ± 11%. Overall, this suggests that size and shape have different genetic properties.

Drosophila heritability principal component analysis shape size 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bitner-Mathé, B.C., A.A. Peixoto & L.B. Klaczko, 1995. Morphological variation in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata: altitudinal cline, temporal changes and influence of chromosome inversions. Heredity 75: 54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bookstein, F.L., B. Chernoff, R.L. Eldler, J.M. Humphries, G.R. Smith & R.E. Strauss, 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  3. Cheverud, J.M., 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36: 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheverud, J.M., 1995. Morphological integration in saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. Am. Nat. 145: 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coyne, J.A. & E. Beecham, 1987. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117: 727–737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. David, J., B. Moreteau, J. Gauthier, G. Pétavy, A. Stockel & A. Imasheva, 1994. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: An isofemale lines analysis.Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 229–251.Google Scholar
  7. Endler, J.A., 1977. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  8. Gibert, P., B. Moreteau, J.C. Moreteau & J.R. David, 1998. Genetic variability of quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) natural populations: Analysis of wild-living flies and of several laboratory generations. Heredity 80: 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillespie, J.H. & M. Turelli, 1989. Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121: 129–138.Google Scholar
  10. Imasheva, A.G., O.A. Bubli & O.E. Lazebny, 1994. Variation in wing length in Eurasian natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 72: 508–514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Imasheva, A.G., O.A. Bubli, O.E. Lazebny & L.A. Zhivotovsky, 1995. Geographic differentiation in wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 96: 303–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kearsey, M.J. & H.S. Pooni, 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  13. Lande, R., 1987. Appendix in: Coyne, J.A. & E. Beecham, 1987. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117: 727–737.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, P., 1992. The Making of a Fly: The Genetics of Animal Design. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Leibowitz, A., M. Santos & A. Fontdevila, 1995. Heritability and selection on body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 141: 181–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lofsvold, D., 1986. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus: I. Test of homogeneity of genetic covariance structure among species and subspecies. Evolution 40: 559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcus, L.F., 1990. Traditional morphometrics, pp 77–122 in: Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop, edited by F.J. Rohlf and F.L. Bookstein. Special Publication Number 2. The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  18. Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  19. Mazer, S.J. & C.T. Schick, 1991. Constancy of population parameters of life-history and floral trait in Raphanus sativus L: II. Effects of planting density on phenotype and heritability estimates. Evolution 45: 1888–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, E.C. & R.A. Miller, 1958. Morphological Integration. University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Partridge, L., A. Hoffmann & J.S. Jones, 1987. Male size and mating success of Drosophila melanogaster and D. Pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim. Behav. 35: 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pezzoli, M.C., D. Guerra, G. Giorgi, F. Garoia & S. Cavicchi, 1997. Developmental constraints and wing shape variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 79: 572–577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfriem, P., 1983. Latitudinal variation in wing size in Drosophila subobscura and its dependence on polygenes of chromosome 0. Genetica 61: 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prevosti, A., 1955. Geographical variability in quantitative traits in populations of Drosophila subobscura. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant. Biol. XX: 294–299.Google Scholar
  25. Prout, T., 1958. A possible difference in genetic variance between wild and laboratory populations. DIS 32: 148–149.Google Scholar
  26. Prout, T. & J.S.F. Barker, 1989. Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 123: 803–813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Riska, B., T. Prout & M. Turelli, 1989. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123: 865–871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson, F.W., 1987. Variation of body size within and between wild populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetica 72: 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roff, D.A. & T.A. Mousseau, 1987. Quantitative genetics and fitness: Lessons from Drosophila. Heredity 58: 103–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruiz, A., M. Santos, A. Barbadilla, J. E. Quezada-Díaz, E. Hasson & A. Fontdevila, 1991. Genetic variance for body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 128: 739–750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Santos, M., A. Ruiz, A. Barbadilla, J.E. Quezada-Díaz, E. Hasson & A. Fontdevila, 1988. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii: XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity 61: 255–262.Google Scholar
  32. Santos, M., A. Ruiz, J.E. Quezada-Díaz, A. Barbadilla & A. Fontdevila, 1992. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size. J. Evol. Biol. 5: 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stalker, H.D. & H.L. Carson, 1947. Morphological variation in natural populations of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 1: 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson, J.N., Jr. & R.C. Woodruff, 1982. Polygenic analysis of pattern formation: Interdependence among veins in the same compartment of the Drosophila wing. Genetica 60: 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas, R.H. & J.S.F. Barker, 1993. Quantitative genetic analysis ofbody size of Drosophila buzzatii. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weigensberg, I. & D.A. Roff, 1996. Natural heritabilities: Can they be reliably estimated in the laboratory? Evolution 50: 2149–2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Young, H.J., M.L. Stanton, N.C. Ellstrand & J.M. Clegg, 1994. Temporal and spatial variation in heritability and genetic correlations among floral traits in Raphanus sativus (wild radish). Heredity 73: 298–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blanche Christine Bitner‐Mathé
    • 1
  • Louis Bernard Klaczko
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de GenéticaInstituto de Biologia, UFRJBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Genética e EvoluçãoInstituto de Biologia, UNICAMPBrazil

Personalised recommendations