# The roles of reification and reflective abstraction in the development of abstract thought: Transitions from arithmetic to algebra

- 349 Downloads
- 17 Citations

## Abstract

This study utilized a psychological constructivist perspective to examine the transitions that students make from arithmetic to algebra in the context of problems, that from the expert's perspective, involve the concept of linear inequality. Unstructured interviews were used to gather data that were used to develop an explanation concerning student understanding. Thirteen college students were interviewed individually and asked to solve nine related tasks. The interviews were videotaped and the protocols were analyzed to document student conceptions. Five case studies were used to develop and substantiate an explanation regarding students' transitions from arithmetic to algebra. Cifarelli's (1988) levels of reflective abstraction and Sfard and Linchevski's (1994) theory of reification provided a framework for this explanation. This paper discusses an integration of Cifarelli and Sfard's constructs. Students who completed a transition to algebra operated at higher levels of reflective abstraction than students who were unable to complete such a transition. Operating at higher levels of reflective abstraction enabled these students to consider concepts as both processes and abstract objects. Developing this ability was found to be critical in achieving a transition to using algebraic methods.

## Keywords

College Student Abstract Object Linear Inequality Abstract Thought Algebraic Method## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## REFERENCES

- Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., and Nichols, E.: 1976,
*How children view equality sentences*(PMDC Technical Report No. 3). Tallahassee: Florida State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 144802).Google Scholar - Cifarelli, V. V.: 1988,
*The role of abstraction as a learning process in mathematical problem solving*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana.Google Scholar - Cobb, P.: 1986, ‘Clinical interviewing in the context of research programs.’ In G. Lappan and R. Even (eds.),
*Proceedings of the eight annual meeting of PME-NA: Plenary speeches and symposium*(pp. 20-26). East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar - Collis, K. F.: 1974,
*Cognitive development and mathematics learning*. Paper presented at the Psychology of Mathematics Workshop, Centre for Science Education, Chelsea College, London.Google Scholar - Collis, K. F.: 1975,
*The Development of Formal Reasoning*. Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar - Filloy, E., and Rojano, T.: 1984, ‘From an arithmetic to an algebraic thought: A clinical study with 12-13 year olds.’ In J. M. Moser (ed.),
*Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter*(pp. 51-56). Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar - Filloy, E., and Rojano, T.: 1989, ‘Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra.’
*For the Learning of Mathematics*9(2), 19-25.Google Scholar - Freudenthal, H.: 1973,
*Mathematics as an Educational Task*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar - Goodson-Espy, T. J.: 1994, ‘A constructivist model of the transition from arithmetic to algebra: Problem solving in the context of linear inequality’ (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1994).
*Dissertation Abstracts International*.Google Scholar - Herscovics, N., and Linchevski, L.: 1994, ‘A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra.’
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*27, 59-78.Google Scholar - Kieran, C.: 1981, ‘Concepts associated with the equality symbol,’
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*12, 317-326.Google Scholar - Piaget, J.: 1970,
*Genetic Epistemology*. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar - Piaget, J.: 1985,
*The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures*, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin,’
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*22, 1-36.Google Scholar - Sfard, A., and Linchevski, L.: 1994, ‘The gains and pitfalls of reification — The case of algebra,’
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*26, 191-228.Google Scholar - Steffe, L. P.: 1990, On the knowledge of mathematics teachers. In N. Noddings, C. Maher and R. Davis (eds.),
*Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics*(pp. 167-184). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1987, ‘Learning as a constructive activity.’ In C. Janvier (ed.),
*Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics*(pp. 1-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1991, ‘Abstraction, re-presentation, and reflection.’ In L. Steffe (ed.),
*Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience*(pp. 45-67). New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar - Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1995,
*Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning.*London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar