Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences

  • Yosihiko Ogata
Article

Abstract

Several space-time statistical models are constructed based on both classical empirical studies of clustering and some more speculative hypotheses. Then we discuss the discrimination between models incorporating contrasting assumptions concerning the form of the space-time clusters. We also examine further practical extensions of the model to situations where the background seismicity is spatially non-homogeneous, and the clusters are non-isotropic. The goodness-of-fit of the models, as measured by AIC values, is discussed for two high quality data sets, in different tectonic regions. AIC also allows the details of the clustering structure in space to be clarified. A simulation algorithm for the models is provided, and used to confirm the numerical accuracy of the likelihood calculations. The simulated data sets show the similar spatial distributions to the real ones, but differ from them in some features of space-time clustering. These differences may provide useful indicators of directions for further study.

Centroid of aftershock epicenters ETAS model inverse power laws maximum likelihood estimates magnitude based clustering (MBC) algorithm modified Omori formula thinning simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automal Control, AC-19, 716–723.Google Scholar
  2. Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (1988). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Fedotov, S. A. (1965). On regularities in distribution of strong earthquakes in Kamchatka, Kurile Islands and northeastern Japan, Trudy Inst. Fiz. Zemli, 36(203), 66–93.Google Scholar
  4. Fletcher, R. and Powell, M. J. D. (1963). A rapidly convergent descent method for minimization, Comput. J., 6, 163–168 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  5. Guo, Z. and Ogata, Y. (1997). Statistical relations between the parameters of aftershocks in time, space and magnitude, Journal of geophysical Research, 102, 2857–2873.Google Scholar
  6. Hawkes, A. G. (1971). Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 33, 438–443.Google Scholar
  7. Kagan, Y. Y. (1991). Likelihood analysis of earthquake catalogues, Journal of geophysical Research, 106, 135–148.Google Scholar
  8. Kagan, Y. Y. and Jackson, D. D. (1991). Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after, Journal of geophysical Research, 96, 21419–21431.Google Scholar
  9. Kagan, Y. Y. and Jackson, D. D. (1995). New seismic gap hypothesis: Five years after, Journal of geophysical Research, 100, 3943–3959.Google Scholar
  10. Kagan, Y. Y. and Knopoff, L. (1978). Statistical study of the occurrence of shallow earthquake, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 55, 67–86.Google Scholar
  11. Kagan, Y. Y. and Knopoff, L. (1980). Spatial distribution of earthquakes: the two-point correlation function, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 62, 303–320.Google Scholar
  12. Kanamori, H. and Anderson, D. L. (1975). Theoretical basis of some empirical relation in seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 65, 1073–1096.Google Scholar
  13. Kowalik, J. and Osborne, M. R. (1968). Methods for Unconstrained Optimization Problems, American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  14. McCann, W. R., Nishenko, S. P., Sykes, L. R. and Krause, J. (1979). Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: Seismic potential for major boundaries, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 117, 1082–1147.Google Scholar
  15. Mogi, K. (1968). Sequential occurrences of recent great earthquakes, Journal of Physics of the Earth, 16, 30–36.Google Scholar
  16. Musmeci, F. and Vere-Jones, D. (1992). A space-time clustering model for historical earthquakes, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 44, 1–11.Google Scholar
  17. Nishenko, S. P. and Sykes, L. R. (1993). Comment on “Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after” with Reply by Jackson, D. D. and Kagan, Y. Y., Journal of geophysical Research, 98, 9909–9920.Google Scholar
  18. Ogata, Y. (1981). On Lewis' simulation method for point processes, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, IT-30, 23–31.Google Scholar
  19. Ogata, Y. (1987). Long term dependence of earthquake occurrences and statistical models for standard seismic activity (in Japanese): Suri Zisin Caku (Mathematical Seismology) II (ed. M. Saito), ISM Cooperative Research Report 3. 115–124, Inst. Statist. Math., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  20. Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83(401), 9–27.Google Scholar
  21. Ogata, Y. (1989). Statistical model for standard seismicity and detection of anomalies by residual analysis, Tectonophysics, 169, 159–174.Google Scholar
  22. Ogata, Y. (1992). Detection of precursory seismic quiescence before major earthquakes through a statistical model, Journal of geophysical Research, 97, 19845–19871.Google Scholar
  23. Ogata, Y. (1993). Space-time modeling of earthquake occurrences, Bulletine of the International Statistical Institute, 55, Contributed papers, Book 2, 249–250.Google Scholar
  24. Ogata, Y. and Abe, K. (1991). Some statistical features of the long term variation of the global and regional seismic activity. International Statistical Review, 59, 139–161.Google Scholar
  25. Ogata, Y. and Katsura, K. (1988). Likelihood analysis of spatial inhomogeneity for marked point patterns, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 40, 29–39.Google Scholar
  26. Ogata, Y., Utsu, T. and Katsura, K. (1995). Statistical features of foreshocks in comparison with other earthquake clusters, Geophysical Journal International, 121, 233–254.Google Scholar
  27. Ohtake, M., Matumoto, T. and Latham, G. V. (1977). Seismicity gap near Oaxaca, southern Mexico as a probable precursor to a large earthquake, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 115, 375–385.Google Scholar
  28. Rathbun S. L. (1993). Modeling marked spatio-temporal point patterns, Bulletine of the International Statistical Institute, 55, Book 2, 379–396.Google Scholar
  29. Rathbun S. L. (1996). Asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator for spatio-temporal point processes, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 51, Special issue on Spatial Statistic, Part II, 55–74.Google Scholar
  30. Utsu, T. (1961). Statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. The Geophysical Magazine, 30, 521–605.Google Scholar
  31. Utsu, T. (1969). Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (I): some parameters which characterize an aftershock sequence and their interaction, Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Ser. VII (geophysics), 3, 129–195.Google Scholar
  32. Utsu, T. (1972). Large earthquakes near Hokkaido and the expectancy of the occurrence of a large earthquake off Nemuro, Report of the Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction, 7, 1–13 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  33. Utsu, T. and Seki, A. (1955). Relation between the area of aftershock region and the energy of the main shock, Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan) 2nd Ser. ii, 7, 233–240 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  34. Yamanaka, Y. and Shimazaki, K. (1990). Scaling relationship between the number of aftershocks and the size of the main shock, J. Phys. Earth, 38, 305–324.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institute of Statistical Mathematics 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yosihiko Ogata
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute of Statistical MathematicsMinato-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations