COMBO: a defined freshwater culture medium for algae and zooplankton
- 2.2k Downloads
In order to conduct experiments on interactions between animals and food organisms, it is necessary to develop a medium that adequately supports the growth of both algae and zooplankton without the need to alter the medium to accommodate either the algae or the animals. We devised a freshwater medium, named COMBO, that supports excellent growth of both algae and zooplankton. Two types of algae, Ankistrodesmus falcatus and Stephanodiscus hantzschii, were reared in COMBO and their growth rates were not significantly different from those of algae grown in a reference medium (WC). One of these algae, A. falcatus, was then fed to a cladoceran, Daphnia pulicaria, which was also cultured in COMBO, and the resulting fecundities of D. pulicaria were compared to those of animals reared in natural surface water. We also determined whether the value of COMBO as a medium for D. pulicaria was affected by modifications in nitrogen or phosphorus concentration to evaluate whether the new medium will be useful in nutritional research. Lowering the N or P content of COMBO did not affect the reproductive performance of D. pulicaria. Other researchers have also reported excellent growth and reproduction by numerous algae and zooplankton reared in COMBO. Our results suggest that COMBO is an effective artificial, defined culture medium capable of supporting robust growth and reproduction of both freshwater algae and zooplankton.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Becker, E.W., 1994. Microalgae. Biotechnology and Microbiology. Cambridge University Press, 293 pp.Google Scholar
- Brand, L. E., R. R. L. Guillard & L. S. Murphy, 1981. A method for the rapid and precise determination of acclimated phytoplankton reproductive rates. J. Plankton Res. 3: 93–101.Google Scholar
- Conklin, D. E. & L. Provasoli, 1977. Nutritional requirements of the water flea, Moina macrocopa. Biol. Bull. 152: 337–350.Google Scholar
- Guillard, R. R. L., 1975. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In W. L. Smith & M. H. Chantey (eds), Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. Plenum Publishers, New York: 29–60.Google Scholar
- Guillard, R. R. L. & P. E. Hargraves, 1993. Stichochrysis immobilis is a diatom, not a chrysophyte. Phycologia 32: 234–236.Google Scholar
- Keating, K. I., P. B. Caffrey & K. A. Schultz, 1989. Inherent problems in reconstituted water. In U. M. Cowgirl & L. R. Williams (eds), Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment, Vol. 12. ASTM STP 1027: 367–378.Google Scholar
- Kreeger, D. A. & C. J. Langdon, 1993. Effect of dietary protein content on growth of juvenile mussels, Mytilus trossulus (Gould 1850). Biol. Bull. 185: 123–139.Google Scholar
- Marking, L. L.& V. K. Dawson, 1973. Toxicity of quinaidine sulfate to fish. Invest. Fish Contr. No. 48, U.S. Fish andWildlife Service, Washington, D.C, 8 pp.Google Scholar
- Morel, F. M. M., J. C. Westall, J. G. Reuter & J. P. Chaplick, 1975. Description of the algal growth media 'Aquil' and 'Fraquil'. Water Quality Laboratory, Ralph Parsons Laboratory for Water Resources and Hydrodynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Report 16, 33 pp.Google Scholar
- Murphy, J. & M. Davidoff, 1972. The result of improved nutrition on the Lansing effect in Moina macrocopa. Biol. Bull. 142: 302–309.Google Scholar
- Rand, G. M. 1995. Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology. Effects, Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment. 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, Washington.Google Scholar
- Stein, J. R. (ed.), 1973. Handbook of Phycological Methods: Culture Methods and Growth Measurements. Cambridge University Press, 448 pp.Google Scholar