John Calvin, the Sensus Divinitatis, and the noetic effects of sin

  • Paul Helm
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beversluis, John (1995). Reforming the ‘reformed’ objection to natural theology, Faith and Philosophy 12(2).Google Scholar
  2. Calvin, John (1960). Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. F. L. Battles. London: S.C.M. Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cicero (1972). The Nature of the Gods. Trans. Horace C. P. McGregor. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, Paul (1967). The argument from consent, in P. Edward (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Hoitenga, Dewey (1991). Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  6. Locke, John (1964). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. John W. Yolton. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  7. Plantinga, Alvin (1983). Reason and belief in God, in A. Plantinga and N. Wolterstorff (eds.), Faith and Rationality. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  8. Wainwright, William (1994). The nature of reason: Locke, Swinburne, and Edwards, in A. G. Padgett (ed.), Reason and the Christina Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Westphal, Merold (1990). On taking St. Paul seriously: Sin as an epistemological category, in T. Flint (ed.), Christian Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  10. Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1983). Can belief in God be rational if it has no foundations?, in A. Plantinga and N. Wolterstorff (eds.), Faith and Rationality. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Helm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Theology and Religious StudiesKing's CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations