Advertisement

International Review of Education

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 47–63 | Cite as

The Marketisation of Education in Singapore: Policies and Implications

  • Jason Tan
Article

Abstract

This article focuses on the marketisation of education in Singapore since the mid-1980s. It describes and analyses two major manifestations of this phenomenon: the encouragement of greater school autonomy and the fostering of competition among schools. The article argues that the Singapore case does not involve a free market, but rather a regulated market. The promotion of such a quasi-market threatens to exacerbate not only the disparities between schools in terms of educational outcomes but also social inequalities. At the same time, it is not entirely clear whether the desired policy goals will be successfully attained. The discussion adds to the existing literature on the marketisation of education and its accompanying policy implications.

Keywords

Policy Implication Social Inequality Free Market Educational Outcome Regulate Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astin, A. W. 1992. Education “Choice”: Its Appeal May Be Illusory. Sociology of Education 65: 255–260.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. ed. 1994. Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, C. 1993. Practical Marketing for Schools. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bowe, R. and Ball, S. J. with Gold, A. 1992. Reforming Education and Changing Schools: Case Studies in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bray, M. 1996. Privatisation of Secondary Education: Issues and Policy Implications. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, D. J. 1990. Decentralization and School-based Management. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, T. 1994. School Autonomy and School Improvement: UK and Singapore Perspectives. Keynote address at the eighth Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association, Singapore.Google Scholar
  8. Chubb, J. E. and Moe, T. M. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  9. Deem, R., Brehony, K. and New, S. 1993. Education for All? Three Schools Go to Market. In: G. Wallace, ed., Local Management, Central Control: Schools in the Market Place (77–91). Bournemouth: Hyde Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Fitz, J., Halpin, D. and Power, S. 1993. Grant Maintained Schools: Education in the Market Place. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  11. Fitz, J., Halpin, D. and Power, S. 1994. Grant Maintained Status: School Autonomy or State Control. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374528).Google Scholar
  12. Goh, C. T. 1992a. Quality Education. Speeches 16(4): 1–4.Google Scholar
  13. Goh, C. T. 1992b. National Day Rally 1992. Singapore: Ministry of Information and the Arts.Google Scholar
  14. Gopinathan, S. 1995. Singapore. In: P. Morris and A. Sweeting, eds., Education and Development in East Asia (79–103). New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Guthrie, J. W. 1991. The World's Evolving Political Economy and the Emerging Globalization of Education: A Set of Extrapolations, Interpolations, and Predictions Regarding the Likely Future Internationalization of Education Policy. Educational Research Journal 6: 1–15.Google Scholar
  16. Le Grand, J., Propper, C. and Robinson, R. 1992. The Economics of Social Problems (3rd ed.). Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, H. L. 1994. The Government, the People and the Future. Speeches 18(4): 15–19.Google Scholar
  18. Low, L. 1994. A Market System With Singapore Characteristics (MPP Working Paper Series No. 4). Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  19. Macbeth, A., McCreath, D. and Aitchison, J. 1995. Competition, Collaboration and Possible Futures. In: A. Macbeth, D. McCreath and J. Aitchison, eds., Collaborate or Compete? Educational Partnership in a Market Economy (1–15). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mathi, B. 1996, May 19. Top Schools Should Take in Bright Foreign Students, Says Yock Suan. The Sunday Times: 28.Google Scholar
  21. Milne, R. S. and Mauzy, D. K. 1990. Singapore: The Legacy of Lee Kuan Yew. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Education, Singapore. 1987. Towards Excellence For All. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore. 1993. Report of the Cost Review Committee. Singapore: SNP Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Nirmala, M. and Mathi, B. 1995. May 24. Schools Making Literature Optional. The Straits Times: 3.Google Scholar
  25. Parliamentary Debates Singapore: Official Report, 54, November 29, 1989; 59, January 6, 1992, January 16, 1992, March 13, 1992; 63, August 25, 1994; 64, March 1, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. Physical Education: Walking in Thin Line Between Fit, Fat and Fun. 1996, April 11. The Straits Times: 40.Google Scholar
  27. Plank, D. N. and Boyd, W. L. 1994. Politics and Governance of Education. In: T. Husén and T. N. Postlethwaite, eds., The International Encyclopedia Of Education Vol. 8(2nd ed.: 4587–4595). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  28. Rogers, M. 1992. Opting Out: Choice and The Future of Schools. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  29. Secretaries of State for Education and Employment and for Wales. 1996. Selfgovernment for Schools (Cm 3315 Presented to Parliament). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  30. Tan, J. 1993. Independent Schools in Singapore: Implications for Social and Educational Inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development 13: 239–251.Google Scholar
  31. Tan, J. 1996. Independent Schools and Autonomous Schools in Singapore: A Study of Two School Privatization Initiatives Aimed at Promoting School Innovation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
  32. Two Schools Willing to Consider Going Regional. 1996, May 10. The Straits Times Life! Supplement: 13.Google Scholar
  33. Walford, G. 1990. Privatization and Privilege in Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, H. E. 1978. Social Engineering in Singapore: Educational Policies and Social Change 1819–1972. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Yip, J. 1982, November. The Role of the Principal in a Decentralised System of Education Management. Paper Presented at Principals' Seminar on Principalship in a Decentralised System of Educational Management, Singapore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Policy & Management Studies, School of EducationNational Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations