, Volume 360, Issue 1–3, pp 169–175

The change in phototactic behaviour of a Daphnia magna clone in the presence of fish kairomones: the effect of exposure time

  • L. De Meester
  • C. Cousyn


Using a clone that responds to the presence of fishkairomones by a pronounced change in phototacticbehaviour, we determined how fast a change to morenegatively phototactic behaviour occurs in Daphnia magnaadults that are exposed to a highconcentration of fish kairomones. Kairomone exposedanimals showed an approximately linear decrease in thevalue of the phototactic index with time. Though theresponse was almost immediate, it took two hoursbefore the difference between fish-induced and controlanimals was significant. Extrapolation of the observedresponse indicates that a maximal change inphototactic behaviour, equivalent to animals that havebeen cultured in the presence of fish kairomones sincebirth, occurs after about 13 hours exposure. Weconclude that the predator-induced change in dielvertical migration of zooplankton is fast, and isfully developed in less than a day. The response timeto fish kairomones of Daphnia is shorter forphototactic behaviour than for life history traits,which may have important consequences with respect tothe evolution of trait-dependence in induced defenceresponses.

phototaxis diel vertical migration induced defence phenotypic plasticity time lag predator avoidance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, F. R. & C. D. Harvell, 1990. Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 407–410.Google Scholar
  2. De Meester, L., 1991. An analysis of the phototactic behaviour of Daphnia magnaclones and their sexual descendants. Hydrobiologia 225: 217–227.Google Scholar
  3. De Meester, L., 1993. Genotype, fish-mediated chemicals and phototaxis in Daphnia. Ecology 74: 1467–1474.Google Scholar
  4. De Meester, L., 1996. Evolutionary potential and local genetic differentiation in a phenotypically plastic trait of a cyclical parthenogen, Daphnia magna. Evolution 50: 1293–1298.Google Scholar
  5. De Meester, L. & J. Pijanowska, 1997. On the trait-specificity of the response of Daphniagenotypes to the chemical presence of a predator. In Lenz, P. H., D. K. Hartline, J. E. Purcell & D. L. Macmillan (eds), Zooplankton: Sensory Ecology and Physiology. Gordon and Breach Publishers, Amsterdam: 407–417.Google Scholar
  6. Forward, R. B. Jr. & D. Rittschof, 1993. Activation of photoresponses of brine shrimp nauplii involved in diel vertical migration by chemical cues from fish. J. Plankton Res. 15: 693–701.Google Scholar
  7. Harvell, C. D., 1990. The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Quart. Rev. Biol. 65: 323–340.Google Scholar
  8. Havel, J. E. & S. I. Dodson, 1987. Reproductive costs of Chaoborus-induced polymorphism in Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiologia 150: 273–281.Google Scholar
  9. Larsson, P. & S. Dodson, 1993. Chemical communication in planktonic animals. Arch. Hydrobiol. 129: 129–155.Google Scholar
  10. Lively, C. M., 1986. Competition, comparative life histories, and maintenance of shell dimorphism in a barnacle. Ecology 67: 858–864.Google Scholar
  11. Loose, C. J., 1993. Daphniadiel vertical migration behavior: response to vertebrate predator abundance. Arch. Hydrobiol., Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 39: 29–36.Google Scholar
  12. Loose, C. J. & P. Dawidowicz, 1994. Trade-offs in diel vertical migration by zooplankton: the costs of predator avoidance. Ecology 75: 2255–2263.Google Scholar
  13. Lüning, J., 1994. Anti-predator defenses in Daphnia–are life-history changes always linked to induced neck spines? Oikos 69: 427–436.Google Scholar
  14. Lynch, M. & R. Ennis, 1983. Resource availability, maternal effects and longevity. Exp. Gerontol. 18: 147–165.Google Scholar
  15. Padilla, D. K. & S. C. Adolph, 1996. Plastic inducible morphologies are not always adaptive: the importance of time delays in a stochastic environment. Evol. Ecol. 10: 105–117.Google Scholar
  16. Parejko, K. & S. I. Dodson, 1990. Progress towards characterization of a predator/prey kairomone: Daphnia pulexand Chaoborus americanus. Hydrobiologia 198: 51–59.Google Scholar
  17. Parejko, K. & S. I. Dodson, 1991. The evolutionary ecology of an antipredator reaction norm: Daphnia pulexand Chaoborus americanus. Evolution 45: 1665–1674.Google Scholar
  18. Reede, T. & J. Ringelberg, 1995. The influence of a fish exudate on two clones of the hybrid Daphnia galeata × hyalina. Hydrobiologia 307: 207–212.Google Scholar
  19. Riessen, H. P., 1984. The other side of cyclomorphosis: why Daphnia lose their helmets. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 1123–1127.Google Scholar
  20. Riessen, H. P. & W. G. Sprules, 1990. Demographic costs of antipredator defenses in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 71: 1536–1546.Google Scholar
  21. Ringelberg, J., 1964. The positively phototactic reaction of Daphnia magnaStraus–a contribution to the understanding of diurnal vertical migration. Neth. J. Sea Res. 2: 319–406.Google Scholar
  22. Ringelberg, J. & H. Servaas, 1971. A circadian rhythm in Daphnia magna. Oecologia 6: 289–292.Google Scholar
  23. Ringelberg, J. & E. van Gool, 1995. Migrating Daphniahave a memory for fish kairomones. Mar. Freshwat. Behav. Physiol. 26: 249–257.Google Scholar
  24. Tollrian, R. & E. von Elert, 1994. Enrichment and purification of Chaoboruskairomone from water: further steps toward its chemical characterization. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 788–796.Google Scholar
  25. Weider, L. J. & J. Pijanowska, 1993. Plasticity of Daphnialife histories in response to chemical cues from predators. Oikos 67: 385–392.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. De Meester
    • 1
  • C. Cousyn
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Ecology and AquacultureKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations