, Volume 351, Issue 1–3, pp 175–196

Conservation and management issues of Prespa National Park

  • G. Catsadorakis
  • M. Malakou


The present article describes the human activities inthe area and their changes and trends, given that thecontemporary nature conservation key issues areclosely related to past and present socio-economic andcultural conditions, both within Prespa itself andoutside of it. The liberation of Prespa, a remote andrather socially isolated borderline area, from Ottoman occupation took place in 1912–13. Recentevents in its environmental history have been forestclearings and human depopulation in the Civil War(1944–49), irrigation system construction in the1960s, its ’discovery‘ by ornithologists in the late1960s, the high emigration rates of 1960–1980, itsdesignation as a National Park in 1974, thedestructive development works of 1984–86 afterGreece‘s entry to the EEC and the conversion to intensivebean cultivation in the mid 1980s.

The human population of ca 7000 at the start of thiscentury suffered an almost 80% decrease after theCivil War. A resettlement in the mid 1950s increasedthe population by 40% but in the 1970s emigrationreduced it to its previous size of around 1500, stillits present size. The extensive and diverse farmingsystems of previous centuries changed gradually afterthe construction of an irrigation network in the1960s, which twenty years later and along withinternational changes in production and economypatterns, made possible the present day domination ofa bean monoculture within irrigated croplands. Thiswas accompanied by increased energy inputs,mechanisation and the use of chemicals.Intensification of agriculture brought increasedincomes which attracted also livestock keepers,resulting in a 56% decrease in numbers of livestockin 1964–1993. Cattle are presently kept for meatproduction only. They graze on the mountains, and nolonger in the meadows around the lakeshore. A localshorthorn breed accounting for 93% of all cattle in1963 declined to less than 18% in 1993. Fishing aimedmainly at carp and Prespa bleak, continues today as inthe past to be a source of supplementary income.Eighty-six per cent of the – mainly oak and beech –forests are State owned and the rest belong to localmunicipalities. The forest area has not changedessentially in the last 40 years, but forest roadshave expanded. Forests provide mainly fuelwood forlocal needs and small quantities of industrial timber.No specific management is conducted to safeguard theconservation values of the forest, the majority ofwhich consists of even aged coppiced stands withlimited value for wildlife. Manufacturing never playedan important role for the economy of the area. Tourismhas increased in the last 20 years, concentratedmainly in summer and spring. Accommodation in thevillages is not yet satisfactory though it hasimproved enormously in recent years. The NationalPark‘s infrastructure for visitors remains poor.Tourist pressure generally is not yet that high toimpact drastically the social and environmentalfabric. In places, hunting, angling and poaching cannegatively affect the target species. The constructionof the irrigation network in the eastern part of LakeMikri Prespa was the most important change to thelandscape and the habitats of Prespa the last 30years. It resulted in the embankment of free-flowingstreams, drainage of wet meadows and dramaticreduction of trees and hedges. In the last 15 years,the reedbeds, no longer burnt or mowed and assisted byincreased nutrient loadings from agricultural runoff,have expanded landward to occupy formerly open,periodically flooded, areas. The above changes inhabitats and land use have brought an impoverishmentof biodiversity which can be seen in the exterminationor the decrease in the numbers of certain plant andbird species.

The problems preventing a better management of theNational Park and the perpetuation of its values areinappropriate legislation, the poor degree ofcoordination of the public services, the lack of botha specific National Park Service in Greece and amanagement authority for the Park and the hostileattitude of local people due to their limitedinformation and involvement. The scenic beauty, thewetlands and a number of rare habitats, the diversityof habitats, flora and fauna, the endemic life forms,the rare mammals and the colonial waterbirds, thelocal architecture and the cultural expressions suchas the Byzantine monuments, are the values of Prespathat must be preserved as a whole. The initialconservation efforts aimed at preserving biodiversitybut later it became apparent that not only are humansan inseparable part of the whole, but additionally,several of their extensive activities have contributedsubstantially to the rich biodiversity of the area.Through the prerequisites of keeping a balance betweenprimary and tertiary sector activities and ofrevitalizing the social fabric, the following are thekey management and conservation issues of today: anunequivocal agreement on the values to be preservedand their limits; the formation of a managementauthority; a new realistic protection and land usezoning; the diversification and extensification of allfarming activities; the restoration of the wet meadowhabitats; the ensuring of a high water level and agood water quality for both lakes through tri-lateralcooperation between Greece, Albania and FYROM; and theestablishment of a permanent environmental monitoringscheme.

biodiversity conservation cultural landscapes ecological integrity ecosystem management Greece human ecology integrated management approach National Park management Prespa protected area management wetland conservation wetland management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Athanassopoulos, G., 1922. Le plateau des lacs de Macedoine occidentale. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 10: 31–39.Google Scholar
  2. Broggi, M. F., 1988. The Alpine region in danger. Naturopa 60: 18–20.Google Scholar
  3. Broikos, A., 1962. Final study for the development of the area around Prespa lakes, Florina. Ministry of Agriculture. Land Reclamation Service. Direction II. Duplicated Report (in Greek), 18 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Catsadorakis, G., 1986a. Notes on the avifauna of Lake Prespa National Park. Biologia Gallo-hellenica 12: 485–496.Google Scholar
  5. Catsadorakis, G., 1986b. Biotopes and vertebrates in Prespa National Park. Ministry of Agriculture and University of Athens, Department of Biology, Section of Ecology and Systematics. Programme for the Survey of the Fauna and Flora of Greece. Duplicated Report (in Greek), 161 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Catsadorakis, G., 1995. The Texts of Prespa Information Centre. Society for the Protection of Prespa. Agios Germanos, 125 pp. (in Greek).Google Scholar
  7. Catsadorakis, G., 1996. Fish and fisheries at Prespa lakes. Society for the Protection of Prespa, 52 pp. (in Greek).Google Scholar
  8. Catsadorakis, G., 1997a. Breeding birds from reedbeds to alpine meadows. Hydrobiologia 351: 143–155.Google Scholar
  9. Catsadorakis, G., 1997b. The importance of Prespa National Park for breeding and wintering birds. Hydrobiologia 351: 157–174.Google Scholar
  10. Catsadorakis, G. & D. Kollaros, 1986. Preliminary notes on the mammalian fauna of Lake Prespa National Park (Greece). 3rd Int. Cong. Zoogeogr. and Ecol. Greece. Patras, 1984. Biologia Gallo-hellenica 12: 507–519.Google Scholar
  11. Catsadorakis, G. & J. Petrides, 1988. The problems of reedbeds in Lake Mikri Prespa. Nature. Bulletin of the Hellenic Society for the Protection of Nature 35: 15–19 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  12. Catsadorakis, G., M. Malakou, M. & A. J. Crivelli, 1996. The Prespa barbel, Barbus prespensis, Karaman 1924, in the Prespa lakes basin, north-western Greece. Tour du Valat, Arles, 79 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Crivelli, A.J., 1984. Fisheries. In Pyrovetsi, M. D., A. J. Crivelli, P. A. Gerakis, M. A. Karteris, E. P. Kastro & N. Komninos, Integrated Environmental Study of Prespa National Park, Greece. Final Report to the C.E.C. DG XI.ix+ 205 pp. + maps.Google Scholar
  14. Crivelli, A. J., G. Catsadorakis, M. Malakou & E. Rosecchi, 1997. Fish and fisheries of the Prespa lakes. Hydrobiologia 351: 107–125.Google Scholar
  15. Crivelli, A. J. & G. Catsadorakis, (eds), 1997. Lake Prespa, Northwestern Greece. [A unique Balkan wetland.] Developments in Hydrobiology 122. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, xiv + 196 pp. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 351.Google Scholar
  16. Gerakis, P. A. & S. E. Tsiouris, 1992. Agricultural techniques for a better protection of wetlands. Final report of a research programme. Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki. School of Agronomy. Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental protection. Thessaloniki, (Mimeographed report in Greek), 104 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Götmark, F., 1992. Naturalness as an evaluation criterion in nature conservation: a response to Anderson. Conserv. Biol. 6: 455–458.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmann, L., W. Bauer & G. Möller, 1971. Proposals for Nature Conservation in Northern Greece. IUCN Occasional paper No. 1. Morges, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  19. Hollis, G. E., H. Athanassiou, S. Bradford, G. Catsadorakis, A. J. Crivelli, R. Flower, A. P. Gerakis, B. Goldsmith, N. Rose, N. Stedman, A. C. Stevenson, D. Thomas & Y. Troumbis, 1989. A Management Plan for the Prespa National Park, Greece. Volume 1: Five Research Studies. Report to WWF (International) on Project 3535, Department of Geography, University College London, 108 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Hutchins, M., 1995. Olympic mountain goat controversy continues. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1324–1326.Google Scholar
  21. Karadedos, G. & P. Tsolakis, 1989. Prespes. In the series: Greek traditional architecture. Melissa, Athens, 46 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Karamani, K., 1983. Research by sampling about the external emigration in the Prefecture of Florina. Ministry of National Economy. Service of Regional Development of Central and Western Macedonia, Thessaloniki. Duplicated Report (in Greek).Google Scholar
  23. Karidas, Ch., 1979. Timber exploitation plan for the forests of the Western part of Prespa area. Florina Forestry Service (Unpublished report, in Greek).Google Scholar
  24. Karteris, M. A. & M. Pyrovetsi, 1986. Land Cover/Use Analysis of Prespa National Park, Greece. Environmental Conservation 13: 319–330.Google Scholar
  25. Koussouris, Th. & A. Diapoulis, 1983. Conservation and Development of the country’s freshwaters. I. Lake Mikri Prespa. Institute of Oceanographic and Fisheries Research Special Publication No 6. (in Greek), 89 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Koussouris, Th., A. Diapoulis & E. T. Balopoulos, 1989. Assessing the trophic status of Lake Mikri Prespa, Greece. Annls. Limnol. 25: 17–24.Google Scholar
  27. Koussouris, Th. & J. Satsmadjis, 1987. Changes in plankton assemblages from spring to summer in a Greek lake. Rev. Int. Oceanogr. Med. 87/88: 51–66.Google Scholar
  28. Koutsoumbidis, E., 1987. Ecological research in the rivers and lakes of the Prefecture of Florina. Prefecture of Florina. Chemical Service, Florina, (in Greek), 183 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Koroni, M., 1979. Geographical region of Prespa: A Development Plan proposal. Ministry of Coordination. Regional Development Service of Central & Western Macedonia, Thessaloniki (in Greek).Google Scholar
  30. Kosmas, C. S., N. G. Danalatos & N. K. Moustakas, 1997. The soils. Hydrobiologia 351: 21–33.Google Scholar
  31. Lichtenberger, E., 1993. Mountainous perspectives. Lessons from history. Naturopa 72: 9–11.Google Scholar
  32. Maltby, E., 1986. Waterlogged wealth. Earthscan. 200 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Makris, K., 1979. The trade of medicinal and aromatic plants and their need for protection. In Proceedings of Conference on the Protection of the Flora, Fauna and Biotopes in Greece. Athens, October 1979. Hellenic Society for the Protection of Nature, Athens, 87–90.Google Scholar
  34. Matheas, Z., 1975. Timber exploitation plan for the forests of the Eastern side of Lake Mikri Prespa. Florina Forestry Service (in Greek). Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  35. Messerli, P., 1993. Managing this vulnerable environment. Naturopa 72: 6–7.Google Scholar
  36. Mitch, W. J. & J. G. Gosselink, 1986. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold. 539 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Mourkidis, G., G. Tsikritsis, S. Tsiouris & O. Menkisoglou, 1978. Lakes of Northern Greece. I. Trophic levels. Sci. Ann. Agronomy & Forestry School, the Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki 21: 94–119.Google Scholar
  38. Noss, R. F., 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiveristy: A hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4: 355–364.Google Scholar
  39. Pavlides, G., 1985. Geobotanical study of the Prespa National Park. Florina. Part A’. Ecology, flora, phytogeography, vegetation. Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki 308 pp., (in Greek, with English summary).Google Scholar
  40. Pavlides, G., 1997a. The flora of Prespa National Park with emphasis on species of conservation interest. Hydrobiologia 351: 35–40.Google Scholar
  41. Pavlides, G., 1997b. Aquatic and terrestrial vegetation of the Prespa area. Hydrobiologia 351: 41–60.Google Scholar
  42. Pearce, F. & A. J. Crivelli, 1994. Characteristics of Mediterranean Wetlands. A MedWet Publication. Tour du Valat, Arles, France, 90 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Planning Service of Central & Western Macedonia, 1975. Development study for Prespa area. Vol. I & II. 250 pp. Unpublished report 250 pp., (in Greek).Google Scholar
  44. Psychoudakis, A., S. Papoutsi-Psychoudaki & A. M. M. McFarquhar, 1993. An Assessment of the irrigation Project Affecting the Wetlands of Prespa, Greece. Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre and Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. 44 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Pyrovetsi, M. D., 1989. Integrated Mediterranean Programmes and the Natural Environment: A Case Study in Greece. Environmentalist 9: 201–211.Google Scholar
  46. Pyrovetsi, M. D. & P. A. Gerakis, 1987. Environmental problems from practising agriculture in PrespaNational Park, Greece. Environmentalist 7: 35–42.Google Scholar
  47. Pyrovetsi, M. D. & M. Karteris, 1986. Forty years of land cover/use changes in Prespa National Park, Greece. J. envir. Mgmt. 23: 173–183.Google Scholar
  48. Scoullos, M. & J. Hatzianestis, 1989. Dissolved and particulate trace metals in a wetland of international importance:Lake Mikri Prespa, Greece. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 44: 307–320.Google Scholar
  49. Stevenson, A. C. & R. J. Flower, 1991. A Palaeoecological Evaluation of Environmental Degradation in Lake Mikri Prespa, NW Greece. Biol. Conserv. 57: 89–109.Google Scholar
  50. Tryphon, E., M. Moustaka-Gouni, G. Nikolaidis & I. Tsekos, 1994. Phytoplankton and physical-chemical features of the shallow Lake Mikri Prespa, Macedonia, Greece. Arch. Hydrobiol. 131: 477–494.Google Scholar
  51. Tsiouris, S. & P. A. Gerakis, 1991. Wetlands of Greece: values, alterations, conservation. WWF & Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Protection of Faculty of Agriculture of Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki & IUCN, Thessaloniki, 96 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Tziafetas, G. N., 1994. Population changes in W.Macedonia. Panorama 3: 10–16.Google Scholar
  53. Vafiadis, L., 1940. Prespa and its beauties. Athens, 93 pp. (in Greek).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Catsadorakis
    • 1
  • M. Malakou
    • 1
  1. 1.Society for the Protection of PrespaAgios GermanosGreece

Personalised recommendations