Hydrobiologia

, Volume 355, Issue 1–3, pp 41–47 | Cite as

Occurrence of epifaunshers on the periwinkle, Littorina littorea (L.), and interactions with the the polychaete Polydora ciliata (Johnston)

  • G. F. Warner
Article

Abstract

A population of Littorina littorea on the northshore of Southampton Water, UK, has been examined forthe occurrence of epifauna. Epifaunal cover was notaffected by shore level below MTL but was greatest onlarger shells, which were commoner on the lower shoreclose to MLWS. Epifaunal components includedbarnacles, serpulids and bryozoans. The polychaetePolydora ciliata occurred most frequently on thelower shore where it excavates galleries in periwinkleshells. Heaviest infestations were found in largershells. P. ciliata settles preferentially in orbeside irregularities on the shell surface. Settlementof barnacles close to the shell aperture, where newshell growth takes place, produces shell distortionwhich creates sites for settlement of P. ciliata. Theangle between serpulid tubes and theshell surface also attracts P. ciliata. It issuggested that colonisation by barnacles and serpulidsfacilitates settlement by P. ciliata, and thatthe latter decreases survival of the host byprogressively destroying the shell.

Littorina littorea epibiota Polydora ciliata intertidal zonation interactions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambariyanto & R. Seed, 1991. The infestation of Mytilus edulis Linnaeus by Polydora ciliata(Johnston) in the Conway Estuary, North Wales. J. moll. Stud. 57: 413–424.Google Scholar
  2. Blake, J. A., 1969. Reproduction and larval development of Polydora from northern New England (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Ophelia 7: 1–63.Google Scholar
  3. Buckley, W. J. & J. P. Ebersole, 1994. Symbiotic organisms increase the vulnerability of a hermit crab to predation. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 182: 49–64.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, A. J., 1991. Effect of patch size on communities of sessile invertebrates in Gulf St Vincent, South Australia. J. exp. mar Biol. Ecol. 153: 255–280.Google Scholar
  5. Crisp, D. J. & H. Barnes, 1954. The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. J. anim. Ecol. 23: 142–162.Google Scholar
  6. Dorsett, D. A., 1961. The behaviour of Polydora ciliata(Johnst.). Tubebuilding and burrowing. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK 41: 577–590.Google Scholar
  7. Fish, J. D., 1972. The breeding cycle and growth of open coast and estuarine populations of Littorina littorea. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK 52: 1011–1019.Google Scholar
  8. Fretter, V. & A. Graham, 1994. British prosobranch molluscs, 2nd edition. Ray Soc. London, 820 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Harper, E. M. & P. W. Skelton, 1993. A defensive value of the thickened periostracum in the Mytiloidea. Veliger 36: 36–42.Google Scholar
  10. Huxham, M., D. Raffaelli & A. Pike, 1993. The influence of Cryptocotyle lingua(Digenea: Platyhelminthes) infections on the survival and fecundity of Littorina littorea(Gastropoda: Prosobranchia); an ecological approach. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 168: 223–238.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, J. B. C., 1977. Habitat area, colonization, and development of epibenthic community structure. In Keegan, B. F., P. O’Céidigh & P. J. S. Boaden (eds), Biology of Benthic Organisms. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 349–358.Google Scholar
  12. Kent, R.M. L., 1979. The influence of heavy infestations of Polydora ciliataon the flesh content of Mytilus edulis. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK 59: 289–297.Google Scholar
  13. Keough, M. J., 1984. Effects of patch size on the abundance of sessile marine invertebrates. Ecology 65: 423–437.Google Scholar
  14. Kumar, S. A. & K. Ayyakkannu, 1991. Periostracum of the gastropod Hemifusus pugilinus: natural inhibitor of boring and encrusting organisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. India 33: 374–378.Google Scholar
  15. Orrhage, L., 1969. On the shell growth of Littorina littorea(Linné) (Prosobranchiata Gastropoda) and the occurrence of Polydora ciliata(Johnston) (Polychaeta Sedentaria). Zool. Bidr. Upps. 38: 137–153.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, J. E. & G. E. Newell, 1955. The dynamics of the zonation of the common periwinkle Littorina littorea(L.) on a stony beach. J. anim. Ecol. 24: 35–56.Google Scholar
  17. Wahl, M., 1989. Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 58: 175–189.Google Scholar
  18. Wahl, M., 1996. Fouled snails in flow: potential of epibionts on Littorina littoreato increase drag and reduce snail growth rates. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 138: 157–168.Google Scholar
  19. Wahl, M. & M. E. Hay, 1995. Associational resistance and shared doom. Oecologia 102: 329–340.Google Scholar
  20. Wahl, M. & H. Sönnichsen, 1992. Marine epibiosis. IV. The periwinkle Littorina littorealacks typical antifouling defences–why are some populations so little fouled? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 88: 225–235.Google Scholar
  21. Wargo, R. N. & S. E. Ford, 1993. The effect of shell infestation by Polydorasp. and infection by Haplosporidium nelsoni(MSX) on the tissue condition of oysters, Crassostrea virginica. Estuaries 16: 229–234.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, E. E., 1964. The growth and distribution of Littorina littorea(L.) on a rocky shore in Wales. J. anim. Ecol. 33: 413–432.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, I. C. & C. Ellis, 1975. Movements of the common periwinkle Littorina littorea(L.), on the Yorkshire coast in winter and the influence of infection with larval Digenea. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 17: 47–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. F. Warner
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Animal and Microbial SciencesThe University of ReadingReadingU.K

Personalised recommendations