Philosophical Studies

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 33–59

THE THEORY OF APPEARING DEFENDED

  • Harold Langsam
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Armstrong, D.M. (1961): Perception and the Physical World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J.L. (1962): Sense and Sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ayer, A.J. (1956): The Problem of Knowledge. Harmondsworth, England: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
  4. Child, W. (1992): 'Vision and Experience: the Causal Theory and the Disjunctive Conception', Philosophical Quarterly 42, 297–316.Google Scholar
  5. Chisholm, R.J. (1957): Perceiving. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chisholm, R.J. (1971): 'The Theory of Appearing', in M. Black (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, pp. 97–112. New York: Books for Libraries.Google Scholar
  7. Dretske, F. (1969): Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Flanagan, O. (1992): Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, A. (1977): 'Perceptual Objects', Synthese 35, 257–284.Google Scholar
  10. Grice, P. (1961): 'The Causal Theory of Perception', in his Studies in the Ways of Words, pp. 224–247. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. Hardin, C.L. (1988): Color for Philosophers. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  12. Harding, G. (1991): 'Color and the Mind-Body Problem', Review of Metaphysics XLV, 289–307.Google Scholar
  13. Hinton, J.M. (1973): Experiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hyman, J. (1992): 'The Causal Theory of Perception', Philosophical Quarterly 42, 277–296.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, F. (1977): Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D. (1986): On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Loar, B. (1990): 'Phenomenal States', in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 4. Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, pp. 81–108. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  18. McDowell, J. (1982): 'Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge', Proceedings of the British Academy 68, 455–479.Google Scholar
  19. McDowell, J. (1986): 'Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space', in P. Petit and J. McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context, pp. 137–168. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. McGinn, C. (1983): The Subjective View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. McGinn, C. (1991): The Problem of Consciousness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, G.E. (1922): Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Nagel, T. (1974): 'What is it Like to be a Bat?' Philosophical Review LXXXIII, 435–450.Google Scholar
  24. Pitcher, G. (1971): A Theory of Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Price, H.H. (1950): Perception. 2d ed. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
  26. Robinson, H. (1985): 'The General Form of the Argument for Berkeleian Idealism', in J. Foster and H. Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley, pp. 163–186. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, H. (1990): 'The Objects of Perceptual Experience II', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LXIV, 151–166.Google Scholar
  28. Sellars, W. (1963): Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Snowdon, P. (1981): 'Experience, Vision, and Causation', in J. Dancy (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge, pp. 192–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Snowdon, P. (1990): 'The Objects of Perceptual Experience I', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LXIV, 121–150.Google Scholar
  31. Snowdon, P. (1992): 'How to Interpret “Direct Perception”', in T. Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience, pp. 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Strawson, P. (1979): 'Perception and its Objects', in G. McDonald (ed.), Perception and Identity, pp. 41–60. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Suchting, W.A. (1969): 'Perception and the Time-Gap Argument', Philosophical Quarterly 19, 46–56.Google Scholar
  34. Tye, M. (1982): 'A Causal Analysis of Seeing', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XLII, 311–325.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold Langsam
    • 1
  1. 1.Corcoran Department of PhilosophyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations