Higher Education

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 115–136 | Cite as

A qualitative review of doctoral dissertations on management in Taiwan

  • Pao-Long Chang
  • Pao-Nuan Hsieh
Article

Abstract

The doctoral dissertation is viewed as the capstone to the doctoralprogram. This study reviews the research topics and methodologies ofmanagement doctoral dissertations from 1988 to 1994 in Taiwan. The results ofthe qualitative analysis of the 120 dissertations are reported as follows:(1) financial management attracted the greatest share of the attention of thedoctoral students, followed by information management; (2) over half of thedissertations were discipline based with mathematics, psychology, economics,and computer science being the most common disciplines; (3) over half of thedissertations were predominantly causal; (4) in the case of empiricaldissertations, survey methods were mostly used, while mathematical modelingwas frequently applied in the case of the non-empirical studies; and (5) mostof the empirical studies involved the information industry. In addition,future directions for management doctoral research are also provided.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astley, W.G. (1984). 'Subjectivity, sophistry and symbolism in management science', Journal of Management Studies 21(3): 259–272.Google Scholar
  2. Burgoyne, J.G. (1994). 'Managing by learning', Management Learning 25(1): 35–55.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, H.H., Cheney, P.H. and Mann, R.I. (1986). 'An analysis of MIS doctoral dissertations', Data Base 17(4): 29–35.Google Scholar
  4. Emory, C.W. and Cooper, D.R. (1991). Business Research Methods, 4th edn. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  5. Green, P., Tull, D.S. and Albaum, G. (1988). Research for Marketing Decisions, 5th edn. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Grun, O. (1987). 'Applied research in business management: who benefits from it and how should it be conducted?', Management International Review 27(3): 4–12.Google Scholar
  7. Isaac, P.D., Quinlan, S.V. and Walker, M.M. (1992). 'Faculty perceptions of the doctoral dissertation', Journal of Higher Education 63(3): 241–269.Google Scholar
  8. Kimberly, J.R. (1976). 'Issues in the design of longitudinal organizational research', Sociological Methods & Research 4(3): 321–347.Google Scholar
  9. Linder, J.C. and Smith, H.J. (1992). 'The complex case of management education', Harvard Business Review 16–23.Google Scholar
  10. Perry, J.L. and Kraemer, K.L. (1986). 'Research methodology in the public administration review,1975-1984', Public Administration Review 215–226.Google Scholar
  11. Phillips, B.S. (1971). Social Research: Strategy and Tactics, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Porter, A.L. and Wolfle, D. (1975). 'Utility of doctoral dissertation', American Psychologist 30(11): 1054–1061.Google Scholar
  13. Scapens, R.W. (1990). 'Researching management accounting practice: the role of case study methods', British Accounting Review 22: 259–281.Google Scholar
  14. Shrivastava, P. and Lim, G.E. (1989). 'A profile of doctoral dissertations in strategic management: a note', Journal of Management Studies 26(5): 531–540.Google Scholar
  15. Shrivastava, P. and Mitroff, I.I. (1984). 'Enhancing organizational research utilization: the role of decision makers' assumptions', Academy of Management Review 9(1): 18–26.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, N.C. (1991). 'The context of doctoral research', in Smith, N.C. and Dainty, P. (eds.), The Management Research Handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Whitley, R. (1984). 'The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science', Journal of Management Studies 21(4): 369–390.Google Scholar
  18. Willmott, H. (1994). 'Management education: provocation to a debate', Management Learning 25(1): 105–136.Google Scholar
  19. Zaltman, G. and Burger, P. (1975). Marketing Research: Fundamental and Dynamics. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.Google Scholar
  20. Zikmund, W.G. (1991). Business Research Methods, 3rd edn. Chicago: Dryden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pao-Long Chang
    • 1
  • Pao-Nuan Hsieh
    • 2
  1. 1.College of ManagementNational Chiao Tung UniversityTaiwan, R.O.C.
  2. 2.Institute of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University and Department of Library ScienceNational Taiwan UniversityTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations