Advertisement

Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 93–101 | Cite as

Accommodative facility training with a long term follow up in a sample of school aged children showing accommodative dysfunction

  • Bertil Sterner
  • Maths Abrahamsson
  • Anders Sjöström
Article

Abstract

The primary aim of this project was to study the effect of flip lens-training on the accommodative function in a group of children with accommodative dysfunction and subjective symptoms such as asthenopia, headache, blurred vision, and avoidance of near activity. We also wanted to measure the accommodative facility among the children in comparison with a control group. Another aim of the study was whether flip lens-training increased accommodative facility, and to find out if it also had a positive effect on their asthenopia and related problems also in long term. Following the training period the accommodative facility and accommodative function significantly increased and two years after finishing the training period no child had regained any subjective symptoms and the objective findings were almost the same as at the end of facility training period. These results suggest that accommodative facility training is an efficient method built on loss of symptoms among children with accommodative infacility.

Keywords

Training Period Refractive Error Subjective Symptom Facility Training Asthenopia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Duane A. Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. J Am Med Assoc 1912; 59: 1010–3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koretz J, Handelman G. How the human eye focuses. Sci Am: 1988; 64–71.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hennessey D, Iosue R, Rouse M. Relation of symptoms to accommodative infacility of school-aged children. Am J Optom Vis Opt 1984; 61: 177–83.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zellers J, Alpert T, Rouse M. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Soc 1984; 55: 31–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKenzie K, Kerr S, Rouse M, Deland P. Study of accommodative facility testing reliability. Am J Optom Phys Opt 1987; 64: 186–94.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jackson T, Goss D Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. J Am Optom Assoc 1991; 62: 857–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daum K. Accommodative dysfunction. Doc Ophthalmol 1983; 55: 177–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berens C, Sells S Experimental studies on fatigue of accommodation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1944; 31: 148–59.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walsh F, Hoyt W Clinical Neuroophthalmology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Co, 1969; 544–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duke-Elder W, Scott G System of Ophthalmology, Vol XII. Neuro-ophthalmology. London, Henry Kimpton Co, 1971: 698–709.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Von Noorden G, Brown D, Parks M. Associated convergence and accommodative insufficiency. Doc Ophthalmol 1973; 34: 393–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russell G, Wick B. A prospective study of treatment of accommodative insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 131–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rutstein R, Daum K, Amos J. Accommodative spasm: a study of 17 cases. J Am Optom Assoc 1988; 59: 527–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goss D, Zhai H. Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. Documenta Ophthalmologica 1994; 86: 349–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hung G, Ciuffreda K. Sensitivity analysis of relative accommodation and vergence. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1994; 41: 241–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper J, Selenow A, Ciuffreda K, Feldman J, Faverty J, Hokoda S, Silver J. Reduction of Asthenopia in patients with convergence insufficiency after fusional training. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 982–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cooper J, Feldman J, Selenow A, Fair R, Buccerio F, MacDonald D, Levy M. Reduction of Asthenopia after accommodative facility raining. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987: 430–6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rouse M. Management of binocular anomalies: Efficacy of vision therapy in the treatment of accommodative deficiencies. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 415–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chrousos G, O'Neill J, Lueth B, Parks M. Accommodation deficiency in healthy young individuals. J Ped Ophthalmol Strab 1988; 25: 176–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoffman L. Rouse M Referral recommendation for binocular function and/or developmental perceptual deficiencies. J Am Optom Assoc 1980; 51: 119–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bobier W, Sivak J. Orthoptic training of subjects showing slow accommodative responses. Am J Optom Phys Opt 1983; 60: 678–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertil Sterner
  • Maths Abrahamsson
  • Anders Sjöström

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations