Accommodative facility training with a long term follow up in a sample of school aged children showing accommodative dysfunction
- 381 Downloads
The primary aim of this project was to study the effect of flip lens-training on the accommodative function in a group of children with accommodative dysfunction and subjective symptoms such as asthenopia, headache, blurred vision, and avoidance of near activity. We also wanted to measure the accommodative facility among the children in comparison with a control group. Another aim of the study was whether flip lens-training increased accommodative facility, and to find out if it also had a positive effect on their asthenopia and related problems also in long term. Following the training period the accommodative facility and accommodative function significantly increased and two years after finishing the training period no child had regained any subjective symptoms and the objective findings were almost the same as at the end of facility training period. These results suggest that accommodative facility training is an efficient method built on loss of symptoms among children with accommodative infacility.
KeywordsTraining Period Refractive Error Subjective Symptom Facility Training Asthenopia
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Duane A. Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. J Am Med Assoc 1912; 59: 1010–3.Google Scholar
- 2.Koretz J, Handelman G. How the human eye focuses. Sci Am: 1988; 64–71.Google Scholar
- 3.Hennessey D, Iosue R, Rouse M. Relation of symptoms to accommodative infacility of school-aged children. Am J Optom Vis Opt 1984; 61: 177–83.Google Scholar
- 4.Zellers J, Alpert T, Rouse M. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Soc 1984; 55: 31–7.Google Scholar
- 5.McKenzie K, Kerr S, Rouse M, Deland P. Study of accommodative facility testing reliability. Am J Optom Phys Opt 1987; 64: 186–94.Google Scholar
- 8.Berens C, Sells S Experimental studies on fatigue of accommodation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1944; 31: 148–59.Google Scholar
- 9.Walsh F, Hoyt W Clinical Neuroophthalmology. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Co, 1969; 544–51.Google Scholar
- 10.Duke-Elder W, Scott G System of Ophthalmology, Vol XII. Neuro-ophthalmology. London, Henry Kimpton Co, 1971: 698–709.Google Scholar
- 17.Cooper J, Feldman J, Selenow A, Fair R, Buccerio F, MacDonald D, Levy M. Reduction of Asthenopia after accommodative facility raining. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987: 430–6.Google Scholar
- 19.Chrousos G, O'Neill J, Lueth B, Parks M. Accommodation deficiency in healthy young individuals. J Ped Ophthalmol Strab 1988; 25: 176–9.Google Scholar
- 21.Bobier W, Sivak J. Orthoptic training of subjects showing slow accommodative responses. Am J Optom Phys Opt 1983; 60: 678–87.Google Scholar