Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 76, Issue 1–4, pp 317–331 | Cite as

Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine

  • Aline Lonvaud-Funel


The winemaking process includes two main steps: lactic acid bacteria are responsible for the malolactic fermentation which follows the alcoholic fermentation by yeasts. Both types of microorganisms are present on grapes and on cellar equipment. Yeasts are better adapted to growth in grape must than lactic acid bacteria, so the alcoholic fermentation starts quickly. In must, up to ten lactic acid bacteria species can be identified. They belong to the Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc and Oenococcus genera. Throughout alcoholic fermentation, a natural selection occurs and finally the dominant species is O. oeni, due to interactions between yeasts and bacteria and between bacteria themselves. After bacterial growth, when the population is over 106CFU/ml, malolactic transformation is the obvious change in wine composition. However, many other substrates can be metabolized. Some like remaining sugars and citric acid are always assimilated by lactic acid bacteri a, thus providing them with energy and carbon. Other substrates such as some amino acids may be used following pathways restricted to strains carrying the adequate enzymes. Some strains can also produce exopolysaccharides. All these transformations greatly influence the sensory and hygienic quality of wine. Malic acid transformation is encouraged because it induces deacidification. Diacetyl produced from citric acid is also helpful to some extent. Sensory analyses show that many other reactions change the aromas and make malolactic fermentation beneficial, but they are as yet unknown. On the contrary, an excess of acetic acid, the synthesis of glucane, biogenic amines and precursors of ethylcarbamate are undesirable. Fortunately, lactic acid bacteria normally multiply in dry wines; moreover some of these activities are not widespread. Moreover, the most striking trait of wine lactic acid bacteria is their capacity to adapt to a hostile environment. The mechanisms for this are not yet c ompletely elucidated . Molecular biology has provided some explanations for the behaviour and the metabolism of bacteria in wine. New tools are now available to detect the presence of desirable and undesirable strains. Even if much remains unknown, winemakers and oenologists can nowadays better control the process. By acting upon the diverse microflora and grape musts, they are more able to produce healthy and pleasant wines.

lactic acid bacteria wine 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arendt EK & Hammes WP (1992) Isolation and characterization of Leuconostoc oenos phages from German wines. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 37: 643-646Google Scholar
  2. Bertrand A, Smirou-Bonnamour C & Lonvaud-Funel A (1984) Aroma compounds formed in malolactic fermentation. Proceedings of the Alko Symposium on flavour research of alcoholic beverages. Helsinki 1984. Biotech. Indus. Perm. Res. 3: 39-49Google Scholar
  3. Cavin JF, Andioc V, Etievant PX, & Divies C (1993) Ability of wine lactic acid bacteria to metabolize phenol carboxylic acids. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 44: 76-80Google Scholar
  4. Cavin JF, Barthelmebs L & Divies C (1997) Molecular characterization of an inducible p-coumaric and decarboxylase from Lactobacillus plantarum: gene cloning, transcriptional analysis, over expression in E. coli, purification and characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 1939-1944Google Scholar
  5. Chatonnet P, Dubourdieu D & Boidron JN (1995) The influence of Brettanomyces/Dekkera sp. yeasts and lactic acid bacteria on the ethylphenol contents of red wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46: 463-468Google Scholar
  6. Couto JA & Hogg TA (1994) Diversity of ethanol-tolerant lactobacilli isolated from Douro fortified wines: clustering and identification by numerical analysis of electrophoretic protein profiles. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76: 487-491Google Scholar
  7. Costello PJ, Lee TH & Henschke P (1996) Recent aspects of mousy taint wine spoilage by lactic acid bacteria. Vth Symposium on lactic acid bacteria. Veldhoven, September 8/12, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Coton E, Rollan GC & Lonvaud-Funel A (1998a) Histidine decarboxylase of Leuconostoc oenos 9204: purification, kinetic properties, cloning and nucleotide sequence of the hdc gene. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 84: 143-151Google Scholar
  9. Colon E, Rollan GC, Bertrand A & Lonvaud-Funel A (1998b) Histamine-producing lactic acid bacteria in wines; early detection frequency and distribution. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 49: 199-204Google Scholar
  10. Davis C, Silveira NFA & Fleet GH (1985) Occurrence and properties of bacteriophages of Leuconostoc oenos in Australian wines. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50: 872-876Google Scholar
  11. Davis CR, Wibowo D, Eschenbruch R, Lee TH & Fleet GH (1985) Practical implications of malolactic fermentation: a review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36: 290-301Google Scholar
  12. Davis CR, Wibowo D, Fleet GH & Lee TH (1988) Properties of wine lactic acid bacteria: their potential enological significance. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 39: 137-142Google Scholar
  13. Denayrolles M, Aigle M & Lonvaud-Funel A (1994) Cloning and sequence analysis of the gene encoding Lactococcus lactis malic enzyme: relationship with malic enzymes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 116: 79-86Google Scholar
  14. Denayrolles M, Aigle M & Lonvaud-Funel A (1995) Functional expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the Lactococcus lactis mleS gene encoding the malolactic enzyme. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 125: 37-44Google Scholar
  15. De Revel G & Bertrand A (1993) Dicarbonyl compounds and their reduction products in wine: identification of wine aldehydes. 7th Weurman Flavor Research Symposium. TNO. June 1993Google Scholar
  16. Dicks LM, Dellaglio F & Collins MG (1995) Proposal to reclassify Leuconostoc oenos as Oenococcus oeni [corrig.]. Gen. Nov., comb. Nov., Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 395-397Google Scholar
  17. Edwards CG, Beelman RB, Bartley CE & McConnell A (1990) Production of decanoic acid and other volatile compounds and the growth of yeast and malolactic bacteria during vinification. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 41: 48-56Google Scholar
  18. Edwards CG & Jensen KA (1992) Occurrence and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Washington State wines: Pediococcus spp. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 43: 233-238Google Scholar
  19. Farias ME, Manca De Nadra MC, Rollan GC & Strasser De Saad AM (1993) Histidine decarboxylase activity in lactic acid bacteria from wine. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 27: 191-199Google Scholar
  20. Festaz-Furet B (1991) Réacteur à enzyme malolactique et NAD. Thesis. University of Saint EtienneGoogle Scholar
  21. Garbay S & Lonvaud-Funel A (1996) Response of Leuconostoc oenos to environmental changes. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81: 619-625Google Scholar
  22. Garmyn D, Monnet C, Martineau B, Guzzo J, Cavin JF & Divies C (1996) Cloning and sequencing of the gene encoding α-acetolactate decarboxylase from Leuconostoc oenos. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 145: 445-450Google Scholar
  23. Garvie El (1981) Sub-divisions within the genus Leuconostoc oenos as shown by RNA/DNA hybridization. J. Gen. Microbiol. 127: 209-212Google Scholar
  24. Gindreau E, Torlois S & Lonvaud-Funel A (1997) Identification and sequence analysis of the region encoding the site-specific integration system from Leuconostoc oenos (Oenococcus oeni) temperate bacteriophage φ10MC. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 147: 279-285Google Scholar
  25. Guzzo J, Delmas F, Pierre F, Jobin MP, Samyn B, Van Beewmer I, Cavin JF & Divies C (1997) A small heat-shock protein from Leuconostoc oenos induced by multiple stresses and during stationary growth phase. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 24: 393-396Google Scholar
  26. Halasz A, Barath A, Simon-Sarkadi L & Holzapfel W (1994). Biogenic amines and their production by microorganisms in food. Trends Food Sc. Technol. 5: 42-49Google Scholar
  27. Harvey RJ & Collins EB (1963) Roles of citrate and acetoin in the metabolism of Streptococcus diacetilactis. J. Bacteriol. 86: 1301-1307Google Scholar
  28. Henick-Kling T, Acree TE, Gavit BK, Kreiger SA & Laurent MH (1993) Sensory aspects of malolactic fermentation. Stockley CS & Lee TH (Eds.). Proceedings of the eighth Australian wines industry technical conference, October 1992, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  29. Hogg T, De Revel G, Couto J, Capela A & Pintado M (1996) Lactobacillus hilgardii. Deterioration of fortified wines and related effects. In: Lonvaud-Funel A (Ed.)'Oenologie 95' (pp. 337-340). Technique et Documentation Lavoisier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Hugenholtz J (1993) Citrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 12: 165-178Google Scholar
  31. King SW & Beelman RB (1986) Metabolic interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Leuconostoc oenos in a model grape juice/wine system. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 37: 53-60Google Scholar
  32. Labarre C, Guzzo J, Cervin JF & Divies C (1996) Cloning and characterization of the genes encoding the malolactic enzyme and the malate permease of Leuconostoc oenos. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 1274-1282Google Scholar
  33. Lafon-Lafourcade S (1983) Wine and brandy in Biotechnology. Vol. 5. HJ Rehm & G Reed (Eds) (pp. 82-163). Verlag ChemieGoogle Scholar
  34. Lafon-Lafourcade S, Carre A, Lonvaud-Funel A & Ribereau-Gayon P (1983) Induction de la fermentation malolactique des vins par inoculation d'une biomasse congelée de Leuconostoc oenos après réactivation. Conn. Vigne Vin 17: 55-71Google Scholar
  35. Le Jeune C, Lonvaud-Funel A, Ten Brink B, Hofstra H & Van Der Vossen JMBM (1995) Development of a detection system for histidine decarboxylating lactic acid bacteria based on DNA probes, PCR and activity test. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 78: 316-326Google Scholar
  36. Liu SO, Pritchard GG, Hardman J & Pilone G (1994) Citrulline production and ethylcarbamate (urethane) precursor formation from arginine degradation by wine lactic acid bacteria, Leuconostoc oenos and Lactobacillus buchneri. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45: 235-242Google Scholar
  37. Liu SO, Pritchard GG, Hardman MJ & Pilone GJ (1995) Occurrence of arginine deiminase pathway enzymes in arginine catabolism by wine lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 310-316Google Scholar
  38. Liu SO, Pritchard GG, Hardman MJ & Pilone GJ (1996) Arginine catabolism in wine lactic acid bacteria: is it via the arginine deiminase pathway or the arginase-urease pathway. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81: 486-492Google Scholar
  39. Llauberes RM, Richard B, Lonvaud-Funel A & Dubourdieu D (1990) Structure of an exocellular β-D-glucan from Pediococcus sp., a wine lactic acid bacterium. Carbohyd. Res. 203: 103-107Google Scholar
  40. Lonvaud M (1975) Recherches sur l'enzyme des bactéries lactiques assurant la transformation du malate en lactate. Thesis. University of Bordeaux 2Google Scholar
  41. Lonvaud-Funel A (1995) Microbiology of malolactic fermentation. Molecular aspects. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 125: 37-44Google Scholar
  42. Lonvaud-Funel A & Strasser De Saad AM (1982) Purification and properties of a malolactic enzyme from strain of Leuconostoc mesenteroides isolated from grapes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43: 357-361Google Scholar
  43. Lonvaud-Funel A, Joyeux A & Desens C (1988) The inhibition of malolactic fermentation of wines by products of yeast metabolism. J. Food Sci. Agri. 44: 183-191Google Scholar
  44. Lonvaud-Funel A, Joyeux A & Ledoux O (1991) Specific enumeration of lactic acid bacteria in fermenting grape must and wine by colony hybridization with non-isotopic DNA probes. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71: 501-508Google Scholar
  45. Lonvaud-Funel A & Joyeux A (1993) Antagonisms between lactic acid bacteria of wines: inhibition of Leuconostoc oenos by Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus. Food microbiol. 10: 411-419Google Scholar
  46. Lonvaud-Funel A, Guilloux Y & Joyeux A (1993) Isolation of a DNA probe for identification of glucan producing Pediococcus damnosus in wine. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74: 41-47Google Scholar
  47. Lonvaud-Funel A & Joyeux A (1994) Histamine production by wine lactic acid bacteria: isolation of a histamine producing strain of Leuconostoc oenos. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 77: 401-407Google Scholar
  48. McDaniel M, Henderson LA, Watson BT Jr & Heatherbell D (1987) Sensory panel training and screening for descriptive analysis of the aroma of Pinot Noir wine fermented by several strains of malolactic bacteria. J. Sensor Studies 149-167Google Scholar
  49. Nel L, Wingfield BD, Van Der Meer LJ & Van Vuuren HJJ (1987) Isolation and characterization of Leuconostoc oenos bacteriophages from wine and sugar cane. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 44: 63-67Google Scholar
  50. Nielsen JC & Prahl C (1996) Metabolism of citric acid by Leuconostoc oenos in direct inoculation, effect on wine flavour. In: Lonvaud-Funel A (Ed.)'Oenologie 95' (pp. 317-320). Technique et Documentation Lavoisier, Paris.Google Scholar
  51. Nielsen JC, Prahl C & Lonvaud-Funel A (1996) Malolactic fermentation in wine by direct inoculation with freeze-dried Leuconostoc oenos cultures. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 47: 42-48Google Scholar
  52. Paraskevopoulos Y (1988) Utilisation des enveloppes cellulaires de levure pour la stimulation de la fermentation malolactique. Interpretation de leur mode d'action. Thesis University of Bordeaux 2Google Scholar
  53. Peynaud E (1956) New information concerning biological degradation of acids. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 7: 150-156Google Scholar
  54. Poblet-Icart M, Bordons A & Lonvaud-Funel A (1998) Lysogeny of Oenococcus oeni (Syn. Leuconostoc oenos) and study of their induced bacteriophages. Curr. Microbiol. 36: 365-369Google Scholar
  55. Poolman B (1993) Energy transduction in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 12: 125-148Google Scholar
  56. Ribereau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Doneche B & Lonvaud A (1998) Le métabolisme des bactéries lactiques. In Traité d'œnologie. Tome 1. Microbiologie du vin.Vinifications. (pp. 171-196). Dunod Ed., ParisGoogle Scholar
  57. Santos R, Vieira G, Santos MA & Pavela H (1996) Characterization of temperate bacteriophages of Leuconostoc oenos and evidence for two prophage attachment sites in the genome of the starter strain PSU-1. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81: 383-392Google Scholar
  58. Schutz M & Radler F (1973) Das 'Malatenzym' von Lactobacillus plantarum and Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Arch. Mikrobiol. 91: 183-202Google Scholar
  59. Silla-Santos MH (1996) Biogenic amines: their importance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 29: 213-231Google Scholar
  60. Sozzi T, Maret R & Poulain JM (1976) Mise en évidence de bactériophages dans le vin. Experimenta 32: 568-569Google Scholar
  61. Sozzi T, Gnaegi F, D'Amico N & Hose H (1982) Difficultés de fermentation malolactique du vin dues à des bactériophages de Leuconostoc oenos. Rev. Suisse Vit. Arb. Hort. 14: 17-23Google Scholar
  62. Ten Brink B, Damink C, Joosten HML, Huis IN, 't Veld JHJ (1990) Occurrence and formation of biologically active amines in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 11: 73-84Google Scholar
  63. Vivas N, Lonvaud-Funel A, Glories Y & Augustin M (1995) The effect of malolactic fermentation in barrels and in tanks on the composition and the quality of red wines. J. Sci. Techn. Tonnell. 1: 65-80Google Scholar
  64. Vivas N, Lonvaud-Funel A & Clones Y (1997) Effect of phenolic acids and anthocyanins on growth, viability and malolactic activity of a lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol. 14: 291-300Google Scholar
  65. Volschenk H, Viljoen M, Grobler J, Bauer F, Lonvaud-Funel A, Denayrolles M, Subden RE & Van Vuuren HJJ (1997) Malolactic fermentation in grape musts by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 48: 193-197Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aline Lonvaud-Funel
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology Department, Faculté d'œnologieUnité associée INRA/Université VictorTalence, CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations