Jupiter's Synchrotron Emission Induced by the Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9
From July 13 to August 21, 1994, we observed Jupiter at 1420 MHz using one of the 30-m single dishes of the Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía. After the impact of fragment G, we detected a rapid increase of the 21cm-continuum flux, which reached the maximum (≈ 20% of Jupiter's flux) at the end of the impact period. The nature of this radiation is clearly synchrotron. We interpret it in terms of a new population of relativistic electrons (≈ 2 × 1029) injected into the Jovian magnetosphere as a consequence of the impact explosions. The proposed mechanism is that the relativistic plasma was blown as magnetic clouds that flowed along the magnetic lines of force towards the jovimagnetic equator. We constructed a model in which the energies of the fresh electrons, generated within the magnetized clouds with a power law energy spectrum, were highly degraded by the comet dust grains attached to the magnetized plasma. The model can account for the spectral shape based on observations at several frequencies (de Pater et al., 1995, Science 268, 1879; Venturi et al., 1996, Astron. Astrophys. 316, 243). The energy released by the explosions under the form of relativistic electrons is of ≈ 2 × 1025 erg, which represents a fraction of about 1–3 per cent of the explosion energy. The efficiency in converting the explosion energy into the relativistic electron energy is, therefore, of the same order of magnitude as that of supernova explosions. An alternative model is considered. This gives figures for the total energy and number of relativistic electrons that are similar to the corresponding ones of the favoured model. Finally, we suggest that the behavior of the flux decay in the various observed frequencies is the result of the diffusion of electrons into the loss-cone due to the resonant scattering of the electrons by Alfven waves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alfven, H.: 1981, Cosmic Plasma, D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Alfven, H. and Fälthammar, C.G.: 1963, Cosmical Electrodynamics, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Behannon, K.W. and Ness, N.F.: 1967, in: R.L. Carovillano, J.F. McClay and H.R. Radoski (eds.), Physics of the Magnetosphere, Astrophys. Space Sci. Library, Vol. 10, D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Chapman, C.R.: 1996, in: K.S. Noll, H.A. Weaver and P.D. Feldman (eds.), The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ip, W.-H.: 1996, in: K.S. Noll, H.A. Weaver and P.D. Feldman (eds.), The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kellermann, K.I. and Owen, N.F.: 1988, in: G.L. Verschuur and K.I. Kellermann (eds.), Galactic and Extragalactic Radio Astronomy, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Nicholson, P.D.: 1996, in: K.S. Noll, H.A. Weaver and P.D. Feldman (eds.), The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Melrose, D.B.: 1994, in: A.O. Benz and T.J.L. Courvoisier (eds.), Plasma Astrophysics, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 24, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Pacholczyk, A.G.: 1970, Radio Astrophysics, Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Rohlfs, K. and Wilson, T.L.: 1996, Tools of Radio Astronomy, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Salter, C. and Brown: 1988, in: G.L. Verschuur and K.I. Kellermann (eds.), Galactic and Extragalactic Radio Astronomy, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Smith, E.J. and Gulkis, S.: 1979, Ann. Rev. of Earth and Planetary Sci. 7.Google Scholar