Documenta Ophthalmologica

, Volume 95, Issue 3–4, pp 301–314 | Cite as

Reduced duration of a visual motion aftereffect in congenital nystagmus

  • Josephine Shallo-Hoffmann
  • Clive J. Wolsley
  • James F. Acheson
  • Adolfo M. Bronstein


Congenital nystagmus (CN) is a primarily horizontal, involuntary, conjugate eye movement which can be observed soon after birth or during the first half-year of life. Individuals with CN rarely complain of oscillopsia. Using a motion aftereffect (MAE), we investigated if individuals with CN have abnormalities in motion perception and if any such abnormality could be due to nystagmus or to compensatory mechanisms to avoid oscillopsia.

In task A, patients (n= 10) and control subjects (n= 10) indicated the direction, duration and relative velocity of MAEs. The subjects binocularly viewed a high contrast, grey scale grating (0.23 cyc/deg; visual angle: 18.3 deg) moving upward or downward at 1, 3, and 6 deg/sec for 60 sec. Vertical optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) was monitored. In task B, patients (n=8) and control subjects (n=8) viewed similar spatial frequency gratings (visual angle: 40.7 degs; 0.5, 0.2, 0.08 cyc/deg) which moved at 4, 10, and 16 deg/sec for 60 sec. In task C, five control subjects, with induced vestibular nystagmus, viewed a grating (0.2 cyc/deg; visual acuity: 28.5 deg), moving upward for 40 sec. In all three tasks, after adaptation with the moving grating, subjects viewed the then static grating and reported the duration and direction of the MAE. One CN patient and eight control subjects reported MABs at all three test velocities in task A. When patients exhibited OKN, the gain was close to one, as in the control group. In task B, seven of the eight patients and all of the control subjects had MABs at the faster adaptation velocities. CN patients had less MAEs at an adaptation velocity of 4 deg/sec and when MAEs were observed, the duration of the illusory motion was reduced by approximately 48%. Control subjects, with induced vestibular nystagmus, reported MAEs at 4 deg/sec (task C).

These findings indicate that nystagmus cannot be the only factor accounting for the suppression of motion perception and suggest that compensatory mechanisms used to avoid oscillopsia contribute to the differences found between the groups.

congenital nystagmus (CN) motion after effect (MAE) motion perception oscillopsia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wade NJ. A selective history of the study of visual motion aftereffects. Perception 1994; 23: 1111–1134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson P. Motion psychophysics. In: Miles FA & Wallmann J (eds). Visual motion and its role in the stabilisation of gaze. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, 1993: pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tootell RB, Reppas JIB, Dale AM, Look RB, Sereno MI, Malach R, Brandy TJ, Rosen BR. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature 1995; 373: 139–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldstein HP, Gottlob I, Fendick MG. Visual remapping in infantile nystagmus. Vis Res 1992; 32: 1115–1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bedell HE, Bollenbacher MA. Perception of motion smear in normal observers and in persons with congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthamol & Vis Sci 1996; 37: 188–195.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leigh RJ, Dell'Osso LF, Yanigios SS, Thurston SE. Oscillopsia, retinal image stabilisation and congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthamol & Vis Sci 1988; 29: 279–282.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dieterich M, Brandt T. Impaired motion perception in congenital nystagmus and acquired ocular motor palsy. Clin Vis Sci 1987; 1: 337–345.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kommerell G, Horn R, Bach M. Motion perception in congenital nystagmus. In: Keller EL & Zee DS (eds). Adaptive processes in visual and oculomotor systems. Oxford: Paragon Press, 1986: 485–491.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bedell HE. Sensitivity to oscillatory target motion in congenital nystagmus. Invest Opthalmol & Vis Sci 1992; 33: 1811–1821.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shallo-Hoffmann J, Bronstein AM, Acheson J, Morland AB, Gresty MA. Vertical and horizontal motion perception in congenital nystagmus. Neuro-Ophthalmol 1998; 19: 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steinman RM, Collewijn H. Binocular retinal image motion during active head rotation. Vis Res 1980; 20: 415–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barnes GR, Smith R. The effects on visual discrimination of image movement across the stationary retina. Aviat, Space, & Environ Med 1981; 52: 466–472.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josephine Shallo-Hoffmann
    • 1
  • Clive J. Wolsley
    • 1
  • James F. Acheson
    • 2
  • Adolfo M. Bronstein
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Human Movement and Balance UnitNational HospitalLondon
  2. 2.Department of Neuro-OphthalmologyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations