Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 25–33

Santa Rosalia revisited: Why are there so many species of bacteria?

  • Daniel E. Dykhuizen
Article

Abstract

The diversity of bacteria in the world is very poorly known. Usually less than one percent of the bacteria from natural communities can be grown in the laboratory. This has caused us to underestimate bacterial diversity and biased our view of bacterial communities. The tools are now available to estimate the number of bacterial species in a community and to estimate the difference between communities. Using what data are available, I have estimated that thirty grams of forest soil contains over half a million species. The species difference between related communities suggests that the number of species of bacteria may be more than a thousand million. I suppose that the explanation for such a large number of bacterial species is simply that speciation in bacteria is easy and extinction difficult, giving a rate of speciation higher than the rate of extinction, leading to an ever increasing number of species over time. The idea that speciation is easy is justified from the results of recent experimental work in bacterial evolution.

bacterial species diversity DNA hybridization experimental evolution species definitions speciation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett AF, Lenski RE & Mittler JE (1992) Evolutionary adaptation to temperature. I Fitness responses of Escherichia colito changes in its thermal environment. Evolution 46: 16-30Google Scholar
  2. Caccone A, DeSalle R & Powell JR (1988) Calibration in the change in thermal stability of DNA duplexes and degree of base pair mismatch. J. Mol. Evol. 27: 212-216Google Scholar
  3. Cohan FM (1994) The effects of rare but promiscuous genetic exchange on evolutionary divergence in prokaryotes. Am. Nat. 143: 965-986Google Scholar
  4. Cohan FM (1995) Does recombination constrain neutral divergence among bacterial taxa? Evolution 49: 164-175Google Scholar
  5. Dean AM (1995) A molecular investigation of genotype by environment interactions. Genetics 139: 19-33Google Scholar
  6. Dykhuizen DE & Dean AM (1994) Predicted fitness changes along and environmental gradient. Evol. Ecol. 8: 1-18Google Scholar
  7. Fisher RA, Corbert AS & Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of individuals and the number of species in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42-58Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths BS, Ritz K & Glover LA (1996) Broad-scale approaches to the determination of siol microbial community structure: Application of the community DNA hybridization technique. Microb. Ecol. 31: 269-280Google Scholar
  9. Helling RB, Vargas C & Adams J (1987) Evolution of Escherichia coliduring growth in a constant environment. Genetics 116: 349-358Google Scholar
  10. Hoke C & Vedros NA (1982) Taxonomy of the Neisseriae: Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition, interspecific transformation, and deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 32: 57-66Google Scholar
  11. Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93: 143-159Google Scholar
  12. Jiménez L (1990) Molecular analysis of deepsubsurface bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 2108-2113Google Scholar
  13. Lee S & Fuhrman JA (1990) DNA hybridization to compare species composition of natural bacterioplankton assemblages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 739-746Google Scholar
  14. Lenski RE & Bennett AF (1993) Evolutionary response of Escherichia colito thermal stress. Am. Nat. 142: S47-64Google Scholar
  15. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC & Tadler SC (1991) Longterm experimental evolution in Escherichia coli.I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138: 1315-1341Google Scholar
  16. Lin C & Stahl DA (1995) Taxonspecific probes for the cellulolytic genus Fibrobacterreveal abundant and novel equine-associated populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 1348-1351Google Scholar
  17. Maynard Smith J (1995) Do bacteria have population genetics? In: Baumberg S, Young JPW, Wellington EMH and Saunders JR (eds.) Population Genetics of Bacteria (pp 112). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Ochman H & Wilson AC (1987) Evolution in bacteria: Evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes. J.Mol. Evol. 26: 74-86Google Scholar
  19. Ochman H & Selander RK (1984) Standard reference strains of Escherichia colifrom natural populations. J. Bacteriol. 157: 690- 693Google Scholar
  20. Patrick R (1968) The structure of diatom communities in similar ecological conditions. Am. Nat. 102: 173-183Google Scholar
  21. Pielou EC & Matthewman WG (1966) The fauna of Fomes fomentarius(Linnaeus ex Fries) Kieckx. growing on dead birch in Gatineau Park, Quebec. Can. Ent. 98: 1308-1312Google Scholar
  22. Preston FW (1948) The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29: 254-283Google Scholar
  23. Preston FW (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43: 185-215, 410-432Google Scholar
  24. Rosenzweig RF, Sharp RR, Treves DS & Adams J (1994) Microbial evolution in a simple unstructured environment: Genetic differentiation in Escherichia coli.Genetics 137: 903-917Google Scholar
  25. Saunders AA (1938) Ecology of the birds of Quaker Run Valley, Allegany State Park, New York. New York State Museum Handbook 16. Albany, N. Y.Google Scholar
  26. Sepkoski JJ, Jr (1984) A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity III. PostPaleozoic families and mass extinction. Paleobiology 10: 246-267Google Scholar
  27. Shen P & Huang HV (1986) Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: Dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics 112: 441-457Google Scholar
  28. Silva PJN (1992) Natural selection of the lacoperon of Escherichia coli.Ph.D. Thesis. State University of New York at Stony Brook. 153 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Spratt BG, Smith NH, Zhou J, O'Rourke M & Feil E (1995) The population genetics of pathogenic Neisseria. In: Baumberg S, Young JPW, Wellington EMH and Saunders JR (eds.) Population Genetics of Bacteria (pp 143-160). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Stahl DA (1995) Application of phylogenetically based hybridization probes to microbial ecology. Molec. Ecol. 4: 535-542Google Scholar
  31. Sugihara G (1980) Minimal community structure: An explanation of species abundance patterns. Am. Nat. 116: 770-787Google Scholar
  32. Torsvik V, Goksøyr J & Daae FL (1990a) High diversity of DNA in soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 782-787Google Scholar
  33. Torsvik V, Salte K, Sørheim R & Goksøyr J (1990b) Comparison of phenotypic diversity and DNA heterogeneity in a population of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 776-781Google Scholar
  34. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, Krichevsky MI, Moore LH, Murry RGE, Stackebrant E, Starr MP & Trüper HG (1987) Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37: 463-464Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel E. Dykhuizen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and EvolutionState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookU.S.A

Personalised recommendations