Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adult-Centered Practices: Benchmarking Study in Higher Education

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adult student enrollment in higher education is approaching 50%, yet most college and university practices have been designed for younger, traditional age students. This study used an innovative benchmarking research methodology, including surveys and site visits, to identify best practices at selected adult-centered institutions. The findings were distilled into one overarching theme and thirteen related themes. The overarching theme, “Adult learner centered institutions have a culture in which flexibility, individuation, and adult-centered learning drive institutional practice” reflects the pervasive student-centeredness of the colleges. The thirteen findings and examples of practices from the colleges that were studied can serve as guideposts to colleges and universities seeking to meet the needs of adult students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alstete, J. W. (1995). Benchmarking in higher education: Adapting best practices to improve quality. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5) Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J., & Gale, D. (1996). A comparison of the psychosocial developmental levels of traditional freshman and nontraditional freshman students: Are they really different? NACADA Journal, 16(1), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanian, C. B., & Brickell, H. M. (1980). Americans in transition: Life changes as reasons for adult learning. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchmarking being embraced. (1998, August). Quality, 37, 14.

  • Benchmarking: Pure and simple. (1997). Houston, American Productivity and Quality Center.

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for a Nation of Lifelong Learners. (1997, November). A nation learning: Vision for the 21st century. Albany, NY: Regents College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1984). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussar, W. J. (1998). Projections of education statistics to 2008. National Center for Education Statistics Report NCES 98-017. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. (1998). Review of the book Benchmarking in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 13, 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, K. (1999). [Transcript of interviews at Empire State College]. Unpublished data. Mancuso, S., Strange, J., & Zakos, P. (1999). Draft report of the ALFI study. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Merriam, S., & Caffarella, R. (1999). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naretto, J. A. (1995). Adult student retention: The influence of internal and external communities. NASPA Journal, 32, 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polson, C. (1994). O'Banion's advising model and the adult student. 14(2), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Principles of good practice for alternative and external degree programs for adults. (1990). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

  • Schlossberg, N.K., Lynch, A.Q., & Chickering, A. W. (1989). Improving higher education environments for adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senter, M. S., & Senter, R. Jr. (1998). A comparative study of traditional and nontraditional students' identities and needs. NASPA Journal, 35, 270–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, N. (1994). Retention, academic success, and progress among adult, returning students: A comparison of the effects of institutional and external factors. NACADA Journal, 14, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, J., & Tucker, R. (1997). For-profit higher education. Transaction Books. SUNY Empire State College 1998-2000 bulletin (1998). Saratoga Springs, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tools and techniques of benchmarking (1999). Houston: American Productivity and Quality Center.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Adult and Higher Education, Western Washington University, USA

    Susan Mancuso (Associate Professor and Chair)

Authors
  1. Susan Mancuso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mancuso, S. Adult-Centered Practices: Benchmarking Study in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education 25, 165–181 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007647531576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007647531576

Search

Navigation