Skip to main content
Log in

An Elusive Evidence Base: The Construction and Governance of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Article
  • Published:
BioSocieties Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1 The idea for this issue emerged from a two-day symposium held at the London School of Economics on 8–9 June 2006. ‘Searching for gold standards—The construction and governance of RCTs and EBM in psychiatry’, was jointly organized by the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and the BIOS Centre. Our thanks to Derek Bolton, Nikolas Rose and George Szmukler for their oversight and support of the symposium.

  2. 2 As is well known, ‘evidence-based medicine’ is itself a contested term, with many practitioners preferring the phrase ‘evidence-informed practice’.

References

  • Armitage P. (1995). Before and after Bradford Hill: Some trends in medical statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 158, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong D. (2002). Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: The problem of changing doctors' behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 1771–1777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft R. (2004). Current epistemological problems in evidence-based medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg M. (1995). Turning a practice into a science: Reconceptualizing postwar medical practice. Social Studies of Science, 25, 437–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I. (1990). Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1405–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I., Hedges L., & Cooper H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 25, 12–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane A. (1972). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections of health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane A. (1987). Cochrane in conversation with Max Blythe at Rhoose Farm, South Wales. Interview transcript, Medical Science Video Archive MSVA 024. Royal College of Physicians and Oxford Brookes University.

  • Corrigan O.P. (2002). ‘First in man’: The politics and ethics of women in clinical drug trials. Feminist Review, 72, 40–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly J., Willis K., Small R., Green J., Welch N., Kealy M. et al. (2006). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehue T. (2002). A Dutch treat: Randomized controlled experimentation and the case of heroin-maintenance in the Netherlands. History of the Human Sciences, 15, 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll R. (2003). Fisher and Bradford Hill: Their personal impact. International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 929–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman K.W. (2003). Ethics and evidence-based medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy D. (2001). The dilemma posed by new and fashionable treatments. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7, 322–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A.W., Hilden J., & Gøtzsche P.C. (2006). Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 333, 782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptchuk T. (1998a). Intentional ignorance: A history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 72, 389–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptchuk T. (1998b). Powerful placebo: The dark side of the randomised control trial. The Lancet, 351, 1722–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield A.M. (1982). Ceteris paribus: The evolution of the clinical trial. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, spring, 1–18.

  • Marks H. (1997) The progress of experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May C. (2006). Mobilising modern facts: Health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moncrieff J., & Cohen D. (2004). Rethinking models of psychotropic drug action. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 970, 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykhalovskiy E., & Weir L. (2004). The problem of evidence-based medicine: Directions for social science. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen V.-K. (2005). Antitretroviral globalism, biopolitics and therapeutic citizenship. In Ong A., & Collier S.J. (Eds), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petryna A. (2005). Drug development and the ethics of the globalized clinical trial. Working Paper, School of Social Science (New School for Social Research), Princeton, NJ, October.

  • Rees W.L. (1997). The place of controlled trials in the development of psychopharmacology. History of Psychiatry, 8, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett D. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S., & Berg M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroucke J. (2002). The history of confounding. History of Epidemiology, 47, 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wahlberg, A., McGoey, L. An Elusive Evidence Base: The Construction and Governance of Randomized Controlled Trials. BioSocieties 2, 1–10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005017

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005017

Navigation