Skip to main content
Log in

Field sampling strategies for coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) infesting berries in coffee farms in Hawaii

  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari, a recent invader to Hawaii, is impacting coffee growers by reducing yields and quality and increasing production costs. Monitoring strategies are needed to assess infestations and where control operations are warranted, and evaluate their effectiveness. To develop and validate a fixed-precision sequential sampling plan, an intensive CBB sampling programme was conducted in 17 small farms in Kona and Kau districts in the Big Island in 2016/17. At each location, 30 trees/ha were monitored at 2–4 week intervals. Results show that the CBB has an aggregated spatial distribution based on Taylor’s power law parameters. According to Green’s stop line formula, between 6 and 50 coffee branches per ha (sample unit) are required to estimate infestation rates of 1.5–2.5% infested green berries (suggested economic threshold) with a precision fixed at 10 to 25%. Concurrently, a modified strategy was tested on 14 farms, in which only infested green berries (not total) was counted. The standard and modified sampling methods were highly correlated (R2 > 0.98), while the modified approach required on average only 35 min (27% less time) to complete, with an additional 24 min taken to observe the position of the CBB inside the berry. Our data also show that berry infestation rates of CBB prior to harvest were a good predictor of the total defects resulting in processed green coffee from these farms (Pearson’s r coefficient of 0.82). Our findings support improved sampling for the CBB under Hawaiian conditions using a simpler and faster monitoring strategy based on counting green infested berries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristizábal L. F., Bustillo A. E. and Arthurs S. P. (2016) Integrated pest management of coffee berry borer: Strategies from Latin America that could be useful for coffee farmers in Hawaii. Insects 7, 6. doi:10.3390/insects7010006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristizábal L. F., Johnson M., Shriner S., Hollingsworth R., Manoukis N., Myers R., Bayman P. and Arthurs S. P. (2017a) Integrated pest management of coffee berry borer in Hawaii and Puerto Rico: Current status and prospects. Insects 8, 123. doi.org/10.3390/insects8040123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristizábal L. F., Shriner S., Hollingsworth R. and Arthurs S. P. (2017b) Flight activity and field infestation relationships for coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) in commercial coffee plantations in Kona and Kau Districts, Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 110, 2421–2427. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristizábal L. F., Lara O. and Arthurs S. P. (2012) Implementing an integrated pest management program for coffee berry borer in a specialty coffee plantation in Colombia. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 3, G1–G5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker P. S. (1989) A sampling plan for a control project against the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) in Mexico. Tropical Pest Management 35, 169–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker P. S. (1999) The coffee berry borer in Colombia. Final report of the DFID - Cenicafé CABI Bioscience IPM for coffee project. Chinchiná, Colombia, 154 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittenbender H. C. and Easton Smith V. (2008) Growing Coffee in Hawaii, revised edition. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR), University of Hawaii at Mānoa, 40 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittenbender H. C., Wright M. and Greco E. (2017) How to make a coffee berry borer (CBB) trap. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR), University of Hawaii at Mānoa, online publicationhttps://doi.org/www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/Site/CBBTrap.aspx (accessed 2.27.17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbano E., Wright M., Bright D. E. and Vega F. E. (2011) New record for the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei, in Hawaii. Journal of Insect Science 11, 117. doi:10.1673/031.011.11701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustillo A. E. (2006) Una revision sobre la broca del café, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 32, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustillo A. E., Cardenas M. R., Villalba D., Orozco J., Benavides M. P. and Posada F. J. (1998) Manejo integrado de la broca del café Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) en Colombia. Cenicafé, Chinchiná, Colombia. 134 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duque H. and Chaves B. (2000) Estudio sobre la adopción del manejo integrado de la broca del café. Cenicafé, Chinchiná, Colombia. 90 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes F. L., Picando M. C., Campos S. O., Bastos C. S., Chediak M., Guedes R. N. C. and Da Silva R. S. (2011) Economic injury level for the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) using attractive traps in Brazilian coffee fields. Journal of Economic Entomology 104, 1909–1917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes F. L., Picando M. C., Fernandes M. E. S., Dangelo R. A. C., Souza F. F. and Guedes R. N. C. (2015) A new and highly effective sampling plan using attractant-baited traps for the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei). Journal of Pest Science 88, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco E. B. and Wright M. G. (2013) Dispersion and sequential sampling plan for Xylosandrus compactus (Coleoptera: Curculionidade) infesting Hawaii coffee plantation. Environmental Entomology 42, 277–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green R. H. (1970) On fixed precision level sequential sampling. Researches on Population Ecology 12, 249–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawaii Department of Agriculture (2017) Plant Industry Division, Coffee berry borer information page, https://doi.org/hdoa.hawaii.gov/pi/ppc/cbbinfo/ (7.31.2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • ICO (International Coffee Organization) (2014) ICO Annual Review 2013/14, https://doi.org/www.ico.org/ (7.31.2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo J., Borgemeister C. and Baker P. (2006) Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Searching for sustainable control strategies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 223–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata A. M., Nakamoto S. T. and Curtiss R. T. (2015) Recommendations for coffee berry borer integrated pest management in Hawai’i 2015. University of Hawaii, Manoa publication # IP-33, https://doi.org/www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/IP-33.pdf (accessed January 30, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariño Y., Vega V. J., Garcia J. M., Verle-Rodrigues J. C., Garcia N. M. and Bayman P. (2017) The coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Puerto Rico: Distribution, infestation, and population per fruit. Journal of Insect Science 17, 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messing R. H. (2012) The coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) invades Hawaii: Preliminary investigations of traps response and alternate hosts. Insects 3, 640–652. doi:10.3390/insects3030640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon R. D. and Wilson L. T. (2009) Sampling for detection, estimation and IPM decision making, pp. 75–89. In Integrated Pest Management Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Studies (edited by E. B. Radcliffe, W. D. Hutchison and R. E. Cancelado). Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira A. E., Vilela E. F., Tinoco R. S., De Lima J. O. G., Fantine A. K., Morais E. G. and Franca C. F. (2012) Correlation between numbers captured and infestation levels of the coffee berry-borer, Hypothenemus hampei:A preliminary basis for an action threshold using baited traps. International Journal of Pest Management 58, 183–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakkatu-thodi I., Gutierrez R. and Wright M. (2017) Comparison of sampling intensity to estimate infestations of coffee berry borer on Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 49, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez D., Cure J. R., Gutierrez A. P., Cotes J. M. and Cantor F. (2013) A coffee agroecosystem model: II. Dynamics of coffee berry borer. Ecological Modelling 248, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz C. and Baker S. P. (2010) Life table of Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) in relation to coffee berry phenology under Colombian field conditions. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz.) 67, 658–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz R., Uribe P. T. and Riley J. (2000) The effect of sample size and spatial scale on Taylor’s power law parameters for coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Tropical Agriculture 77, 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood T. R. and Henderson P. A. (2000) Ecological Methods, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. 592 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L. R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature (London) 189, 732–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L. R. (1984) Assessing and interpreting the spatial distribution of insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology 29, 321–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo E. H. I., Aristizábal L. F., Bustillo A. E. and Jiménez Q. M. (2006) Evaluación de métodos para cuantificar poblaciones de broca del café, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) en fincas de caficultores experimentadores. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 32, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NASS (2017) Hawaii Coffee Marketing Preliminary Season Estimates, February 1st, 2017, https://doi.org/www.nass.usda.gov (2/16/2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega F. E., Infante F. and Johnson A. J. (2015) The genus Hypothenemus, with emphasis on H. hampei, the coffee berry borer, pp. 427–494. In Bark Beetles, Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species, 1st ed. (edited by F. E. Vega and R. W. Hofstetter). Elsevier, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villacorta A., Wilson L. T., Cfarrilla E. and Ochoa H. (2006) Enumerative and binomial sequential sampling plan for damage caused to coffee by larvae of Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Méneville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) in Guatemala. Revista Peruviana de Entomología 45, 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis F. Aristizabal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aristizabal, L.F., Shriner, S., Hollingsworth, R. et al. Field sampling strategies for coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) infesting berries in coffee farms in Hawaii. Int J Trop Insect Sci 38, 418–426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S174275841800022X

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S174275841800022X

Key words

Navigation