Skip to main content
Log in

Dung burial by roller dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): An individual and specific-level study

  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) mediate many ecological functions that are important to maintain the ecosystem functioning of terrestrial environments. Although a large amount of literature explores the dung beetle-mediated ecological processes, little is known about the individual contribution from distinct species. Here, we aimed to examine the intra and interspecific variations in dung burial rates performed by two roller dung beetle species (Canthon smaragdulus Fabricius, 1781 and Canthon sulcatus Castelnau, 1840). Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between dung beetle biomass and dung burial rates. We set up a laboratorial experiment with three treatments (two males, two females, and a couple) and 10 replicates per treatment for each dung beetle species, and dung burial rates were measured after exposing 100 g of mixed pig and human excrement for 48 hours. Our results demonstrate that dung burial rates of males, females, and couples within each species do not differ. However, C. smaragdulus individuals performed a larger dung burial than C. sulcatus individuals did. In addition, we found no effect of individual biomass on the amount of dung burial on intra and interspecific levels. These findings highlight the need for further research considering that distinct species, even from the same genus, may perform different rates of ecological processes, as well as about the importance for considering the beetle biomass when measuring their ecological functions. We call for studies to fill in the knowledge gap about the individual species’ contribution to the maintenance of different dung beetle-mediated ecological processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andresen E. (2002) Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecological Entomolology 27, 257–270. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00408.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen E. (2003) Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography 26, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anduaga S. (2004) Impact of the activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) inhabiting pasture land in Durango, Mexico. Environmental Entomology 33, 1306–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes F. Z. (1986) Caracterizaçâo climática do Estado de Minas Gerais. Informe Agropecuário 12, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang H. S., Lee J. H., Kwon O. S., Na Y. E., Jang Y. S. and Kim W. H. (2005) Effects of paracoprid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the growth of pasture herbage and on the underlying soil. Applied Soil Ecolology 29, 165–171. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J., Lennox G. D., Ferreira J., Berenguer E., Lees A. C., Mac Nally R., Thomson J. R., Ferraz S. F., Louzada J., Oliveira V. H., Parry L., Solar R. R., Vieira I. C., Aragâo L. E., Begotti R. A., Braga R. F., Cardoso T. M., de Oliveira R.C., Souza C. M., Moura N. G., Nunes S. S., Siqueira J. V., Pardini R., Silveira J. M., Vaz-de-Mello F. Z., Veiga R. C. S., Venturieri A. and Gardner T. A. (2016) Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535, 144–147. doi:10.1038/nature18326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barragán F., Moreno C. E., Escobar F., Halffter G. and Navarrete D. (2011) Negative impacts of human land use on dung beetle functional diversity. PLoS One 6, e17976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellard C., Bertelsmeier C., Leadley P., Thuiller W. and Courchamp F. (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belles X. and Favila M. E. (1983) Protection chimique du nid chez Canthon cyanellus cyanellus LeConte (Col. Scarabaeidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 88, 602–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga R. F., Korasaki V., Andresen E. and Louzada J. (2013) Dung beetle community and functions along a habitat-disturbance gradient in the Amazon: A rapid assessment of ecological functions associated to biodiversity. PLoS One 8, e57786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057786.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braga R. F., Carvalho R., Andresen E., Anjos D. V., Alves-Silva E. and Louzada J. (2017) Quantification of four different post-dispersal seed deposition patterns after dung beetle activity. Journal of Tropical Ecology 33, 407–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho R., Ferreira Châline R. S., Audino L. D., Louzada J. and Châline N. (2018) Do pygidial secretions of dung beetles have the potential to repel urban pest ants? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 166, 517–527. doi:10.1111/eea.12706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho I. R. and Ribeiro S. P. (2006) Environment heterogeneity and seasonal effects in ground-dwelling ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) assemblages in the Parque Estadual do Rio Doce, MG, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 35, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covich A. P., Palmer M. A. and Crowl T. A. (1999) The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems: Zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. Bioscience 49, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M. J. (eds) (2002) Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus. John Wiley & Sons, London, United Kingdon. 772 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M. J. (eds) (2013) The R Book. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, United Kingdom. 1076 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutsinger G. M., Collins M. D., Fordyce J. A., Gompert Z., Nice C. C. and Sanders N. J. (2006) Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process. Science 313, 966–968.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de OA Nunes L. G., Nunes R. V. and Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. (2018) Taxonomic revision of the South American subgenus Canthon (Goniocanthon) Pereira & Martínez, 1956 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Deltochilini). European Journal of Taxonomy, 437, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen D. J. (1997) Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41, 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favila M. E. (1993) Some ecological factors affecting the life-style of Canthon cyanellus cyanellus (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae): An experimental approach. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 5, 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favila M. E. (2001) Ecología Química en Escarabajos Coprófagos y Necrófagos de la Subfamilia Scarabaeinae, pp. 541–580. In Relaciones Químicas entre Organismos: Aspectos Básicos y Perspectivas de su Aplicación (edited by A. L. en Anaya, F. J. Espinosa-García, and R. Cruz-Ortega). Instituto de Ecología, UNAM y Plaza y Valdés, S.A. de C.V. México. D. F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franca F., Barlow J., Araújo B. and Louzada J. (2016a) Does selective logging stress tropical forest invertebrates? Using fat stores to examine sublethal responses in dung beetles. Ecological Evolution 6, 8526–8533. doi:10.1002/ece3.2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franca F., Louzada J., Korasaki V., Griffiths H., Silveira J. M. and Barlow J. (2016b) Do space-for-time assessments underestimate the impacts of logging on tropical biodiversity? An Amazonian case study using dung beetles. Journal of Applied Ecology 53, 1098–1105. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franca F. M., Korasaki V., Louzada J. and Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. (2016c) First report on dung beetles in intra-Amazonian savannahs in Roraima, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 16. doi:10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2015-0034.

  • Franca F., Louzada J. and Barlow J. (2018) Selective logging effects on ‘brown world’ faecal-detritus pathway in tropical forests: A case study from Amazonia using dung beetles. Forest Ecology and Management 410, 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory N., Gómez A., Oliveira T. M. F. de S. and Nichols E. (2015) Big dung beetles dig deeper: Trait-based consequences for faecal parasite transmission. International Journal for Parasitology 45, 101–105. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths H. M., Bardgett R. D., Louzada J. and Barlow J. (2016a) The value of trophic interactions for ecosystem function: Dung beetle communities influence seed burial and seedling recruitment in tropical forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 283, 20161634. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths H. M., Louzada J., Bardgett R. D. and Barlow J. (2016b) Assessing the importance of intraspecific variability in dung beetle functional traits. PLoS One 11, e0145598. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths H. M., Louzada J., Bardgett R. D., Beiroz W., Franca F., Tregidgo D. and Barlow J. (2015) Biodiversity and environmental context predict dung beetlemediated seed dispersal in a tropical forest field experiment. Ecology 96, 1607–1619. doi:10.1890/14-1211.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G. and Edmonds W. D. (1982) The Nesting Behavior of Dung Beetles (Scarabaeinae): An Ecological and Evolutive Approach. Instituto de Ecologia, Mexico, D. F., 176 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G. and Matthews E. G. (1966) The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana 12, 1–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. and Cambefort Y. (eds) (1991) Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, United States. 514 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper D. U., Chapin F. S., Ewel J. J., Hector A., Inchausti P, Lavorel S., Lawton J. H., Lodge D. M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setala H., Symstad A. J., Vandermeer J. and Wardle D. A. (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan F. G. (2001) Burial of bovine dung by coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from horse and cow grazing sites in El Salvador. European Journal of Soil Biology 37, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C., Williams N. M., Aizen M. A., Gemmill-Herren B., LeBuhn G., Minckley R., Packer L., Potts S. G., Roulston T’ai., Dewenter I. S., Vázquez D. P, Winfree R., Adams L., Crone E. E., Greenleaf S. S., Keitt T. H., Klein A. M., Regetz J. and Ricketts T. (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10, 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M., Naeem S., Inchausti P, Bengtsson J., Grime J. P, Hector A., Hooper D. U., Huston M. A., Rafaelli D., Schmid B., Tilman D. and Wardle D. A. (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294, 804–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh C. J., Louzada J., Beiroz W. and Ewers R. M. (2013) Optimising bait for pitfall trapping of Amazonian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). PLoS One 8(8), e73147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E. and Gardner T. A. (2011) Dung beetles as a candidate study taxon in applied biodiversity conservation research, pp. 267–291. In Ecology and Evolution of Dung Beetles (edited by L. W. Simmons and T. J. Ridsdill-Smith), Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E., Spector S., Louzada J., Larsen T., Amezquita S. and Favila M. E. (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation 141, 1461–1474. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E., Uriarte M., Bunker D. E., Favila M. E., Slade E. M., Vulinec K., Larsen T. H., Vaz-de-Mello F. Z., Louzada J. N. C., Naeem S. and Spector S. H. (2013a) Trait-dependent response of dung beetle populations to tropical forest conversion at local and regional scales. Ecology 94, 180–189. doi:10.1890/12-0251.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E., Uriarte M., Peres C. A., Louzada J., Braga R. F., Schiffler G., Endo W. and Spector S. H. (2013b) Human-induced trophic cascades along the fecal detritus pathway. PLoS One 8, e75819. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Heredia C. and Andresen E. (2014) Upward movement of buried seeds: Another ecological role of dung beetles promoting seedling establishment. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30, 409–417. doi:10.1017/ S0266467414000376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Heredia C., Andresen E., del-Val E. k., Zárate A., Mendoza M. N. and Jaramillo V. J. (2016) The activity of dung beetles increases foliar nutrient concentration in tropical seedlings. Biotropica 48, 565–567. doi: 10.1111/btp.12364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade E. M., Mann D. J., Villanueva J. F. and Lewis O. T. (2007) Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 1094–1104. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01296.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade E. M., Roslin T., Santalahti M. and Bell T. (2016) Disentangling the ‘brown world’ faecal-detritus interaction web: Dung beetle effects on soil microbial properties. Oikos 125, 629–635. doi:10.1111/oik.02640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrush S. F., Hewitt J. E., Gibbs M., Lundquist C. and Norkko A. (2006) Functional role of large organisms in intertidal communities: Community effects and ecosystem function. Ecosystems 9, 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. (2000) Estado Atual de conhecimentos dos Scarabaeidae s. str. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) do Brasil, pp. 181–195. In El Inventario Y Estimación de La Diversidad Entonológica Em Iberoamérica (edited by F. Martín-Piera, J. J. Morrone and A. Melic). Monografias Tercer Milenio, Zaragoza, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaz-de-Mello F., Larsen T., Silva F., Gill B., Spector S. and Favila M. (2014) Canthon smaragdulus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available from URL: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.20141. RLTS.T137476A525653.en. [Accessed 3 February 2017].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ver Hoef J. M. and Boveng P. L. (2007) Quasi-poisson vs. negative binomial regression: How should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology 88, 2766–2772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfahrt G., Bahn M., Haubner E., Horak I., Michaeler K., Rottmar L., Tappeiner U. and Cernusca A. (1999) Inter-specific variation of the biochemical limitation to photosynthesis and related leaf traits of 30 species from mountain grassland ecosystems under different land use. Plant, Cell & Environment 22, 1281–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada D., Imura O., Shi K. and Shibuya T. (2007) Effect of tunneler dung beetles on cattle dung decomposition, soil nutrients and herbage growth. Grassland Science 53, 121–129. doi:10.1111/j.1744-697X.2007.00082.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. L. Carvalho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvalho, R.L., Frazão, F., Ferreira-Châline, R.S. et al. Dung burial by roller dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): An individual and specific-level study. Int J Trop Insect Sci 38, 373–380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758418000206

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758418000206

Key words

Navigation